The past few days have witnessed some of the worst attacks against Ukrainian civilians since the start of the war in February 2022.
“The surge in long-range missile and drone strikes across the country has brought even more death and destruction to civilians far away from the frontline,” UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine head Danielle Bell said.
New data from the mission, which has monitored loss of life throughout all of Russia’s major bombing offensives, showed that the monthly casualty rate among Ukraine’s civilian population last month was the highest in more than three years. Civilian casualties included 232 deaths, and 1,343 Ukrainians injured in the span of one month.
As dire as conditions for civilians have become, the surge in Russian violence might also mark a turning point in Ukraine’s favor. US President Donald Trump has now signaled a shift in his position, which Ukrainians and their allies across the West hope would be sustained.
LETHAL WEAPONS
Trump’s decision to supply the type of lethal missiles — paid for by Europe — that would allow Ukraine to continue its fight against Russian aggression reflects his slow loss of trust in Russian President Vladimir Putin’s willingness to negotiate a peace agreement. Likewise, Trump’s accompanying threat to impose new sanctions comes in response to Putin’s failure to honor his promises.
Putin has another reason to worry. On Tuesday last week, the Ukrainian parliament voted overwhelmingly in favor of establishing, together with the Council of Europe, a special tribunal to try Russia for the crime of aggression against Ukraine. The Ukrainian decision ratifies the agreement that was signed in Strasbourg, France, on June 25, during Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy’s first visit to the Council of Europe.
An unmistakable signal has now been sent that there would be no safe haven for Putin and the clique who made the decision to wage aggressive war against Ukraine. The future tribunal would allow investigations of all the highest-ranking leaders of the Russian state. While heads of state, heads of governments and foreign ministers benefit from personal immunity from prosecution, this would be no bar to gathering evidence against them and being prepared to issue a formal indictment the instant they leave office.
The agreement follows the Council of Europe’s suspension of Russia’s representation rights in February 2022, after 26 years of Russian membership, and then expelling Russia a month later, in accordance with Article 8 of its statute.
The tribunal is the culmination of three years of pressure to hold the Kremlin accountable for its actions in Ukraine. The International Criminal Court (ICC) has already issued arrest warrants for Putin and Russian Commissioner on Children’s Rights Maria Lvova-Belova for her role in the unlawful deportation of thousands of Ukrainian children to Russia. Last year, ICC judges issued arrest warrants for former Russian minister of defense Sergei Shoigu and Chief of the Russian General Staff of the Armed Forces Valery Gerasimov for attacks on Ukraine’s electricity infrastructure.
WAR CRIMES
However, a tribunal has become necessary because, despite having jurisdiction over war crimes, crimes against humanity (which now include the destruction of schools, hospitals and infrastructure, and the deliberate targeting of civilians), and genocide committed on Ukraine’s territory, the ICC cannot prosecute Russia’s political and military leaders for the crime of aggression.
This is because Russia is not a party to the Rome Statute, which established the ICC, and because the country’s veto power at the UN prevents the Security Council from referring the matter to the court. That leaves only a special tribunal to prosecute Putin’s foundational crime: planning, preparing and executing the invasion, occupation and attempted annexation of Ukraine, dating back to the invasion of Crimea in 2014.
Prosecuting the regime for the crime of aggression against Ukraine falls squarely within the mission of the Council of Europe, founded in the aftermath of World War II, when much of the continent lay in ruins, with the goal of upholding the rule of law and human rights. It would also send the important message that a rules-based system is still the best way to create a more stable and peaceful world.
REINFORCEMENTS
That message is needed now more than ever, as Putin ramps up Russia’s war machine and increases the pressure not only on the front line in Ukraine, but also on civilians. The Kremlin has reportedly imported workers from Asian and African countries to bolster the workforce in factories manufacturing drones, with China accused of providing vital components in large quantities.
So, what has happened recently is of great significance. New US armaments are to begin to arrive soon, and the message has gone out to Putin and his criminal cabal: criminal indictments are coming, and there will be nowhere to hide. Quite simply, there will be few places outside of Russia where Putin can be certain of not facing the humiliation of a potential arrest. His impunity is coming to an end.
Gordon Brown, a former prime minister of the UK, is UN special envoy for global education and chair of Education Cannot Wait.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Taiwan has lost Trump. Or so a former State Department official and lobbyist would have us believe. Writing for online outlet Domino Theory in an article titled “How Taiwan lost Trump,” Christian Whiton provides a litany of reasons that the William Lai (賴清德) and Donald Trump administrations have supposedly fallen out — and it’s all Lai’s fault. Although many of Whiton’s claims are misleading or ill-informed, the article is helpfully, if unintentionally, revealing of a key aspect of the MAGA worldview. Whiton complains of the ruling Democratic Progressive Party’s “inability to understand and relate to the New Right in America.” Many
US lobbyist Christian Whiton has published an update to his article, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” discussed on the editorial page on Sunday. His new article, titled “What Taiwan Should Do” refers to the three articles published in the Taipei Times, saying that none had offered a solution to the problems he identified. That is fair. The articles pushed back on points Whiton made that were felt partisan, misdirected or uninformed; in this response, he offers solutions of his own. While many are on point and he would find no disagreement here, the nuances of the political and historical complexities in
Taiwan faces an image challenge even among its allies, as it must constantly counter falsehoods and misrepresentations spread by its more powerful neighbor, the People’s Republic of China (PRC). While Taiwan refrains from disparaging its troublesome neighbor to other countries, the PRC is working not only to forge a narrative about itself, its intentions and value to the international community, but is also spreading lies about Taiwan. Governments, parliamentary groups and civil societies worldwide are caught in this narrative tug-of-war, each responding in their own way. National governments have the power to push back against what they know to be
Taiwan is to hold a referendum on Saturday next week to decide whether the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant, which was shut down in May after 40 years of service, should restart operations for as long as another 20 years. The referendum was proposed by the opposition Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and passed in the legislature with support from the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). Its question reads: “Do you agree that the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant should continue operations upon approval by the competent authority and confirmation that there are no safety concerns?” Supporters of the proposal argue that nuclear power
RSS