A domestic violence incident became a homicide in New Taipei City’s Tucheng District (土城) on Monday last week, when a 46-year-old man, surnamed Hsieh (謝), allegedly rammed his car into his 42-year-old wife and her 33-year-old younger sister, both surnamed Chang (張), before allegedly stabbing them to death.
The wife had already applied for a restraining order against her husband in May, and police apprehended him over the weekend for violating it. However, the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office granted Hsieh bail on Sunday, and with 24 hours of his release, the shocking tragedy unfolded.
Restraining orders are effective in deterring abuse in about 80 percent of domestic violence cases, experts said. Only a small number of offenders — typically those with criminal records, mental health issues or highly controlling tendencies — challenge such legal restrictions.
Experts urged people not to dismiss the importance of retraining orders due to last week’s isolated incident, as doing so might prevent more people from seeking help. That warning must be taken seriously.
As for the less common, high-risk cases, is the system adequately prepared?
People who defy the terms of their restraining orders are not unaware of the restrictions — they just do not fear the consequences.
When such incidents occur, are the existing mechanisms for judicial intervention and crisis prevention truly prepared to handle them?
Restraining orders are important protective tools that carry a legal and deterrent effect. They prohibit perpetrators from committing acts of violence or harassment, and might also require them to keep a certain distance away from the person who filed the request or vacate a shared residence.
For law-abiding people, restraining orders draw a clear legal red line. To those intent on committing violence, they do little to stop premeditated acts of revenge.
The prevention and handling of domestic violence cases cannot rely solely on restraining orders or the efforts of frontline personnel.
In last week’s case, the offender was arrested by police and sent to the prosecutors’ office — all according to standard procedure.
However, that Hsieh was released highlights a lack of sensitivity within the law enforcement system toward the severity of domestic violence cases.
While police and social workers do their utmost on the front lines, the judiciary must shoulder the responsibility of being the final line of defense.
When dealing with perpetrators who contravene restraining orders or have a history of violence, prosecutors should exercise heightened vigilance and consider precautionary measures such as detention, bail or supervision. Courts must also impose deterrent penalties. If the judiciary fails to respond quickly and effectively, victims are left exposed to the risk of further harm.
Ken is the pen name of a domestic violence social worker.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
When former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) first took office in 2016, she set ambitious goals for remaking the energy mix in Taiwan. At the core of this effort was a significant expansion of the percentage of renewable energy generated to keep pace with growing domestic and global demands to reduce emissions. This effort met with broad bipartisan support as all three major parties placed expanding renewable energy at the center of their energy platforms. However, over the past several years partisanship has become a major headwind in realizing a set of energy goals that all three parties profess to want. Tsai
An elderly mother and her daughter were found dead in Kaohsiung after having not been seen for several days, discovered only when a foul odor began to spread and drew neighbors’ attention. There have been many similar cases, but it is particularly troubling that some of the victims were excluded from the social welfare safety net because they did not meet eligibility criteria. According to media reports, the middle-aged daughter had sought help from the local borough warden. Although the warden did step in, many services were unavailable without out-of-pocket payments due to issues with eligibility, leaving the warden’s hands
Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesman Randhir Jaiswal told a news conference on Jan. 9, in response to China’s latest round of live-fire exercises in the Taiwan Strait: “India has an abiding interest in peace and stability in the region, in view of our trade, economic, people-to-people and maritime interests. We urge all parties to exercise restraint, avoid unilateral actions and resolve issues peacefully without threat or use of force.” The statement set a firm tone at the beginning of the year for India-Taiwan relations, and reflects New Delhi’s recognition of shared interests and the strategic importance of regional stability. While India
A survey released on Wednesday by the Taiwan Inspiration Association (TIA) offered a stark look into public feeling on national security. Its results indicate concern over the nation’s defensive capability as well as skepticism about the government’s ability to safeguard it. Slightly more than 70 percent of respondents said they do not believe Taiwan has sufficient capacity to defend itself in the event of war, saying there is a lack of advanced military hardware. At the same time, 62.5 percent opposed the opposition’s efforts to block the government’s NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.6 billion) special defense budget. More than half of respondents — 56.4
RSS