A group of Taiwan’s top aesthetic plastic surgeons from the Taiwan Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery last month attended the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery’s Olympiad World Congress 2025, held in Singapore from June 19 to 21. The event’s organizers listed Taiwan as a participating country — just “Taiwan,” no “Taiwan, China,” no lumping Taiwan in with China. That was met with dissatisfaction from the Chinese delegation, which lodged a protest.
After the event organizers refused to change Taiwan’s designation, the Chinese attendees walked out, canceling their scheduled remarks and participation in the event.
The behavior of the Chinese delegation was not surprising, as they are accustomed to walking out of events as a means of exerting pressure on organizers, prioritizing their political agenda over professionalism.
It was reassuring that the Taiwanese surgeons were not affected by the disruption. On the contrary, some even rose to the occasion by stepping in to deliver remarks and fill in the gaps left by the sudden withdrawal of Chinese speakers.
As a result, Taiwan became the main representative of the Chinese-speaking community at this year’s Olympiad World Congress.
Over the years, Taiwanese aesthetic plastic surgeons have quietly gained an international reputation, earning recognition for their uniquely sophisticated technology and rigorous professionalism among Asian practitioners.
They have no need to rely on political slogans or sheer volume to gain success; instead, they let their academic presentations and surgical demonstrations speak for themselves, showcasing to the world the value behind the name “Taiwan.”
The incident in Singapore once again proves that in the face of political escalation those who uphold the academic field are always the ones who are most prepared and possess the strongest capabilities.
While Taiwanese doctors might not excel at self-promotion, they are always more than willing to step up when the world needs it their help — all while proudly wearing clothing bearing the name “Taiwan.” Regardless of their personal political beliefs, the moment they step onto the international stage, they choose to do so with unity and professionalism; they choose to make the name “Taiwan” worthy of earning international respect. Their composure, courage and strength represent the true power of Taiwan.
Elliot Yao is a reviewer.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
RSS