Over the past few months, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party legislators have often asserted that the government has overtaxed citizens, and that they would “return the money to the people” through universal cash handouts. As an academic who researches public finance and government budgeting, I believe the universal cash handouts are neither legal nor logical.
Such a move would likely impose a heavy burden on the National Treasury Administration. If the handouts are written into law, they could be detrimental to the long-term health of the nation’s finances.
First, a tax surplus, what the opposition has framed as “overtaxation,” simply means that the tax revenue collected in a given year exceeded the government’s expectations; it does not mean that the government imposed excess taxes or collected more money from taxpayers than it should have.
The opposition’s notion that the money must be “returned to the people” is entirely unfounded and, naturally, fails to provide a legitimate justification for universal cash handouts.
Second, Article 70 of the Constitution stipulates that the Legislative Yuan “shall not make proposals for an increase in the expenditures in the budgetary bill presented by the Executive Yuan.” In proposing that the government distribute universal cash handouts, legislators are already overstepping their legal authority and contravening the Constitution.
More importantly, the central government had an outstanding debt exceeding NT$5.8 trillion (US$198.6 billion) as of July 4. Even if tax revenue temporarily exceeded the government’s expectations, the funds should be used to pay down the national debt, strengthen the social safety net or support important government functions such as education, national defense and long-term care.
Only when a government is free of its debt burden and has a fiscal surplus — as is the case with the local governments of Chiayi City, and Kinmen and Lienchiang (Matsu) counties — is it appropriate to consider sharing economic gains through universal cash handouts.
Even if the goal is to stimulate the economy, that could be achieved with the distribution of limited time-use consumption coupons and should only be considered during a severe economic downturn. Cash handouts are not only limited in their effectiveness, but might also pose a heavy financial burden.
If legislators force through universal cash handouts without any comprehensive planning or legal basis, the move — while attractive on the surface — could crowd out other government expenditures and lead to the misallocation of fiscal resources.
Liao Wei-jie is an assistant professor of public management at the City University of New York John Jay College of Criminal Justice.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
In a summer of intense political maneuvering, Taiwanese, whose democratic vibrancy is a constant rebuke to Beijing’s authoritarianism, delivered a powerful verdict not on China, but on their own political leaders. Two high-profile recall campaigns, driven by the ruling party against its opposition, collapsed in failure. It was a clear signal that after months of bitter confrontation, the Taiwanese public is demanding a shift from perpetual campaign mode to the hard work of governing. For Washington and other world capitals, this is more than a distant political drama. The stability of Taiwan is vital, as it serves as a key player
Much like the first round on July 26, Saturday’s second wave of recall elections — this time targeting seven Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers — also failed. With all 31 KMT legislators who faced recall this summer secure in their posts, the mass recall campaign has come to an end. The outcome was unsurprising. Last month’s across-the-board defeats had already dealt a heavy blow to the morale of recall advocates and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), while bolstering the confidence of the KMT and its ally the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). It seemed a foregone conclusion that recalls would falter, as
The fallout from the mass recalls and the referendum on restarting the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant continues to monopolize the news. The general consensus is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has been bloodied and found wanting, and is in need of reflection and a course correction if it is to avoid electoral defeat. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has not emerged unscathed, either, but has the opportunity of making a relatively clean break. That depends on who the party on Oct. 18 picks to replace outgoing KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫). What is certain is that, with the dust settling
Mainland Affairs Council Deputy Minister Shen You-chung (沈有忠) on Thursday last week urged democratic nations to boycott China’s military parade on Wednesday next week. The parade, a grand display of Beijing’s military hardware, is meant to commemorate the 80th anniversary of Japan’s surrender in World War II. While China has invited world leaders to attend, many have declined. A Kyodo News report on Sunday said that Japan has asked European and Asian leaders who have yet to respond to the invitation to refrain from attending. Tokyo is seeking to prevent Beijing from spreading its distorted interpretation of wartime history, the report
RSS