In the policy paper “National Security Strategy 2025” released by the British government on Tuesday last week, Taiwan and the Taiwan Strait are mentioned multiple times. Emphasizing the importance of the South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait in global trade and supply chains, it said that their stability is of strategic significance to the UK.
The paper stated the UK’s position: People on both sides of the Taiwan Strait should resolve their differences through peaceful and constructive dialogue, and the UK opposes any form of military threats or coercion.
The UK does not support any unilateral attempts to change the “status quo” and is committed to deepening its cooperation with Taiwan, including collaboration in areas such as trade, education and technological innovation, it said.
The paper showed a more explicit and proactive UK stance on Taiwan, integrating it into the UK’s broader security and Indo-Pacific strategies. This was a shift from previous diplomatic ambiguity: The UK’s growing concern over China’s rise is now concretely reflected in its policy documents.
On the same day, British Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs David Lammy addressed the British House of Commons on China policy, reiterating that the UK’s position on Taiwan remains unchanged and affirming continued efforts to bolster bilateral cooperation.
Regarding the British Royal Navy’s HMS Spey’s transit of the Taiwan Strait on June 18, Lammy said it was in defense of freedom of navigation in the South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait. Lammy also signaled that the UK would likely carry out more such deployments.
This move demonstrated the UK’s commitment to freedom of navigation in the Indo-Pacific region and signaled a firm stance on the Taiwan Strait issue, countering China’s unilateral attempts to undermine regional peace and stability.
Through naval operations and policy articulation, the UK is actively engaging in regional strategy. This aligns with the British government’s vision for “Global Britain” and offers a security policy model for other European countries grappling with how to respond to China’s expansionist posture.
Elliot Yao is a reviewer.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
In a meeting with Haitian Minister of Foreign Affairs Jean-Victor Harvel Jean-Baptiste on Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) vowed to continue providing aid to Haiti. Taiwan supports Haiti with development in areas such as agriculture, healthcare and education through initiatives run by the Taiwan International Cooperation and Development Fund (ICDF). The nation it has established itself as a responsible, peaceful and innovative actor committed to global cooperation, Jean-Baptiste said. Testimonies such as this give Taiwan a voice in the global community, where it often goes unheard. Taiwan’s reception in Haiti also contrasts with how China has been perceived in countries in the region
On April 13, I stood in Nanan (南安), a Bunun village in southern Hualien County’s Jhuosi Township (卓溪), absorbing lessons from elders who spoke of the forest not as backdrop, but as living presence — relational, sacred and full of spirit. I was there with fellow international students from National Dong Hwa University (NDHU) participating in a field trip that would become one of the most powerful educational experiences of my life. Ten days later, a news report in the Taipei Times shattered the spell: “Formosan black bear shot and euthanized in Hualien” (April 23, page 2). A tagged bear, previously released
The world has become less predictable, less rules-based, and more shaped by the impulses of strongmen and short-term dealmaking. Nowhere is this more consequential than in East Asia, where the fate of democratic Taiwan hinges on how global powers manage — or mismanage — tensions with an increasingly assertive China. The return of Donald Trump to the White House has deepened the global uncertainty, with his erratic, highly personalized foreign-policy approach unsettling allies and adversaries alike. Trump appears to treat foreign policy like a reality show. Yet, paradoxically, the global unpredictability may offer Taiwan unexpected deterrence. For China, the risk of provoking the
Young supporters of former Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) were detained for posting the names and photographs of judges and prosecutors believed to be overseeing the Core Pacific City redevelopment corruption case. The supporters should be held responsible for their actions. As for Ko’s successor, TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), he should reflect on whether his own comments are provocative and whether his statements might be misunderstood. Huang needs to apologize to the public and the judiciary. In the article, “Why does sorry seem to be the hardest word?” the late political commentator Nan Fang Shuo (南方朔) wrote
RSS