In the policy paper “National Security Strategy 2025” released by the British government on Tuesday last week, Taiwan and the Taiwan Strait are mentioned multiple times. Emphasizing the importance of the South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait in global trade and supply chains, it said that their stability is of strategic significance to the UK.
The paper stated the UK’s position: People on both sides of the Taiwan Strait should resolve their differences through peaceful and constructive dialogue, and the UK opposes any form of military threats or coercion.
The UK does not support any unilateral attempts to change the “status quo” and is committed to deepening its cooperation with Taiwan, including collaboration in areas such as trade, education and technological innovation, it said.
The paper showed a more explicit and proactive UK stance on Taiwan, integrating it into the UK’s broader security and Indo-Pacific strategies. This was a shift from previous diplomatic ambiguity: The UK’s growing concern over China’s rise is now concretely reflected in its policy documents.
On the same day, British Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs David Lammy addressed the British House of Commons on China policy, reiterating that the UK’s position on Taiwan remains unchanged and affirming continued efforts to bolster bilateral cooperation.
Regarding the British Royal Navy’s HMS Spey’s transit of the Taiwan Strait on June 18, Lammy said it was in defense of freedom of navigation in the South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait. Lammy also signaled that the UK would likely carry out more such deployments.
This move demonstrated the UK’s commitment to freedom of navigation in the Indo-Pacific region and signaled a firm stance on the Taiwan Strait issue, countering China’s unilateral attempts to undermine regional peace and stability.
Through naval operations and policy articulation, the UK is actively engaging in regional strategy. This aligns with the British government’s vision for “Global Britain” and offers a security policy model for other European countries grappling with how to respond to China’s expansionist posture.
Elliot Yao is a reviewer.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS