On the eve of the 28th anniversary of Hong Kong’s handover to China and the fifth anniversary of the promulgation of Hong Kong’s National Security Law, the pro-democracy party League of Social Democrats (LSD), the last active pro-democracy party in Hong Kong, on Sunday announced its disbandment due to “immense political pressure,” marking another major casualty of Beijing’s years-long crackdown on dissent in the “Pearl of the Orient.”
Following massive anti-extradition bill protests in 2019, Beijing in 2020 imposed the National Security Law to criminalize secession, subversion, terrorism and foreign collusion, which has a maximum sentence of life imprisonment, aiming to curb dissent and end pro-democracy protests.
Hong Kong security agencies said that since 2020, at least 332 people, mostly pro-democracy activists, have been detained and 189 companies have been prosecuted for various national security offenses under the law.
A Human Rights Watch report released this week showed that Hong Kong authorities have continued to persecute protesters who participated in the 2019 protests, arresting 10,279 people and prosecuting 2,976 as of April.
Dozens of civil society groups have also been dissolved, and at least 14 independent news outlets shut down. The Civic Party closed in 2023, while the Democratic Party, Hong Kong’s oldest and biggest pro-democracy party, in February announced that it would disband. The LSD was the last pro-democracy party that still occasionally held small street protests and booth activities despite the risks.
LSD chairperson Chan Po-ying (陳寶瑩) said: “While we are now forced to disband and feel an ache in our conscience, we have no other choice.”
Amnesty International Hong Kong Overseas said that LSD’s dissolution “reveals the near purging of Hong Kong’s pan-democratic political parties and civil society organizations.”
Chinese and Hong Kong authorities are still widening the dragnet to crush the opposition, with “sedition” frequently used to target a wide range of peaceful expression, including children’s books, independent journalism and social media posts.
Copying tactics long used by Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to surveil its people, Hong Kong in 2020 set up a national security hotline to incentivize citizens to report one another. Hong Kong authorities claimed to have received more than 920,000 tip-offs as of last month.
Hong Kong has been a canary in the coal mine for Taiwan, providing bloody lessons. The semi-autonomy and freedom China promised Hong Kong in the Sino-British Joint Declaration of 1997 has already vanished. The “one country, two systems” model has become “one country, one system,” with the CCP cementing its supremacy to dominate the territory.
As the “one country, two systems” model China used to promote cross-strait unification has been rejected by most Taiwanese, Beijing has introduced a slew of national security-related legislation to target Taiwanese and threaten Taiwan’s autonomy. With the growing number of Taiwanese being harassed and “disappeared” in China, the CCP has unveiled its ambition to take Taiwan under its autocratic control.
In Hong Kong, the CCP turned the government into a political proxy and its legislative body into a rubber stamp to solidify Chinese control. Beijing has also deployed such proxy warfare in Taiwan, manipulating pro-China forces into repeatedly echoing the CCP’s “one China” principle and twisting the facts about Taiwanese sovereignty in an attempt to counter Taiwanese unity and national consciousness.
Facing China’s ambition, safeguarding Taiwanese democracy and sovereignty, and not following in Hong Kong’s footsteps, is a challenge, but it is a mandatory task for all Taiwanese.
A failure by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respond to Israel’s brilliant 12-day (June 12-23) bombing and special operations war against Iran, topped by US President Donald Trump’s ordering the June 21 bombing of Iranian deep underground nuclear weapons fuel processing sites, has been noted by some as demonstrating a profound lack of resolve, even “impotence,” by China. However, this would be a dangerous underestimation of CCP ambitions and its broader and more profound military response to the Trump Administration — a challenge that includes an acceleration of its strategies to assist nuclear proxy states, and developing a wide array
Eating at a breakfast shop the other day, I turned to an old man sitting at the table next to mine. “Hey, did you hear that the Legislative Yuan passed a bill to give everyone NT$10,000 [US$340]?” I said, pointing to a newspaper headline. The old man cursed, then said: “Yeah, the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] canceled the NT$100 billion subsidy for Taiwan Power Co and announced they would give everyone NT$10,000 instead. “Nice. Now they are saying that if electricity prices go up, we can just use that cash to pay for it,” he said. “I have no time for drivel like
Twenty-four Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers are facing recall votes on Saturday, prompting nearly all KMT officials and lawmakers to rally their supporters over the past weekend, urging them to vote “no” in a bid to retain their seats and preserve the KMT’s majority in the Legislative Yuan. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which had largely kept its distance from the civic recall campaigns, earlier this month instructed its officials and staff to support the recall groups in a final push to protect the nation. The justification for the recalls has increasingly been framed as a “resistance” movement against China and
Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) reportedly told the EU’s top diplomat that China does not want Russia to lose in Ukraine, because the US could shift its focus to countering Beijing. Wang made the comment while meeting with EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas on July 2 at the 13th China-EU High-Level Strategic Dialogue in Brussels, the South China Morning Post and CNN reported. Although contrary to China’s claim of neutrality in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, such a frank remark suggests Beijing might prefer a protracted war to keep the US from focusing on
RSS