When the Presidential Office announced that President William Lai (賴清德) was going to embark on a series of 10 talks under the umbrella theme of “unity,” Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers immediately ridiculed the idea, saying that Lai himself was the main source of division within the country. This was a sentiment that at least their opposition party colleagues could unite around.
Lai gave the first talk on June 22, followed by a second two days later, in which he focused on the idea of unity and offered olive branches to the opposition KMT and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP): He invoked the achievements of the KMT after its arrival in Taiwan and the political DNA of the TPP’s inspiration, the original Taiwan People’s Party founded by democracy activist Chiang Wei-shui (蔣渭水) a century ago. However, the olive branches were tinged with barbs: The president’s calls for unity were not offered unconditionally.
In his third talk, delivered on Sunday, Lai removed the gloves: His discussion on the nature of the Republic of China (ROC) Constitution and of constitutional government included more explicit criticisms of the opposition parties’ conduct in the Legislative Yuan.
Lai spoke of the conflict in the legislature over certain amendments proposed by the KMT and the TPP that were eventually ruled unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court, and asked his audience to consider whether those amendments were in the interests of the nation, or whether they were politically driven: Did the opposition’s proposals meet the needs of the Taiwanese, or the expectations of society?
From here, he warmed to the theme, saying that the “only solution” was “more democracy,” which would start with reinforcing the constitutional system, and which would ultimately serve to let the legislative majority — the opposition — understand the place of the Legislative Yuan within that system.
Expressing his faith in the power of civil movements, he evoked the 1990 Wild Lily student movement, the 2008 Wild Strawberry movement, the 2014 Sunflower movement, the Bluebird movement of last year and this year’s mass recall drive. The first three occurred during KMT administrations, the latter two were driven by public anger over the KMT’s and the TPP’s actions in the legislature.
If the recall movement had been hidden in the background in previous talks, it was thrust front and center in this one. Sunday’s talk was the first time Lai appeared to be willing to be seen as taking a central role in the movement, or at least an overtly supportive one, at the same time taking an adversarial stance against the opposition.
The position Lai that would take on the issue of “unity” over the arc of these 10 talks is now becoming clear: Having laid out his vision of Taiwanese history and identity, the nature of the enemy, the importance of national defense, the value of order within constitutional government and the power of grass-roots movements, he is seeking unity within the country against the opposition parties.
The KMT and the TPP have accused Lai, without evidence, of initiating the recall movement; with this third talk, there have been criticisms from other corners of what some feel are his attempts to appropriate it for his own political ends. Some commentators sympathetic to his agenda have expressed concern that the latter perception would impede his objectives and jeopardize the success of the recalls.
Despite criticisms that Lai appears deaf to the everyday concerns of Taiwanese while he is laser-focused on historical, legal, ideological and abstract concepts, these criticisms depend on what the critics believe is driving the anger behind the recall drive.
A failure by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respond to Israel’s brilliant 12-day (June 12-23) bombing and special operations war against Iran, topped by US President Donald Trump’s ordering the June 21 bombing of Iranian deep underground nuclear weapons fuel processing sites, has been noted by some as demonstrating a profound lack of resolve, even “impotence,” by China. However, this would be a dangerous underestimation of CCP ambitions and its broader and more profound military response to the Trump Administration — a challenge that includes an acceleration of its strategies to assist nuclear proxy states, and developing a wide array
Eating at a breakfast shop the other day, I turned to an old man sitting at the table next to mine. “Hey, did you hear that the Legislative Yuan passed a bill to give everyone NT$10,000 [US$340]?” I said, pointing to a newspaper headline. The old man cursed, then said: “Yeah, the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] canceled the NT$100 billion subsidy for Taiwan Power Co and announced they would give everyone NT$10,000 instead. “Nice. Now they are saying that if electricity prices go up, we can just use that cash to pay for it,” he said. “I have no time for drivel like
Twenty-four Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers are facing recall votes on Saturday, prompting nearly all KMT officials and lawmakers to rally their supporters over the past weekend, urging them to vote “no” in a bid to retain their seats and preserve the KMT’s majority in the Legislative Yuan. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which had largely kept its distance from the civic recall campaigns, earlier this month instructed its officials and staff to support the recall groups in a final push to protect the nation. The justification for the recalls has increasingly been framed as a “resistance” movement against China and
Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) reportedly told the EU’s top diplomat that China does not want Russia to lose in Ukraine, because the US could shift its focus to countering Beijing. Wang made the comment while meeting with EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas on July 2 at the 13th China-EU High-Level Strategic Dialogue in Brussels, the South China Morning Post and CNN reported. Although contrary to China’s claim of neutrality in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, such a frank remark suggests Beijing might prefer a protracted war to keep the US from focusing on
RSS