The mass recall movement has become a crucial battle to determine Taiwan’s future. The pivotal issue is whether to take an anti-communist stance and protect Taiwan, or to support a pro-China, anti-US political party.
Moderate voters are the most crucial factor in deciding the recalls. Although the majority of moderates are unwilling to accept Beijing’s “one country, two systems” framework as justification for forced unification, they also want to avoid war with China.
To oust as many of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators on the recall ballot as possible, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must strengthen its discourse around anti-communism and protecting Taiwan, while simultaneously dispelling the logical fallacies promoted by blue-leaning moderates who want to sow fear that resisting China would lead to war.
Taiwan possesses dual importance due to its geostrategic location and maritime position, as well as its significant role in the global semiconductor supply chain.
With Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co investing and constructing facilities in the US, the economic interests of Taipei and Washington are becoming increasingly inextricable. Therefore, Taiwan’s free democracy positively correlates with the US’ national interests.
To maintain its political, economic and strategic interests in the Indo-Pacific region, the US must increase arms sales to Taiwan, and bolster military training and cooperation between the countries.
Doing so would enhance Taiwan’s ability to resist China and defend itself, and further allow the US to preserve its influence in the Western Pacific and deter China from invading Taiwan.
The moment that the US chose to strike Iranian nuclear sites in support of Israel, US President Donald Trump set an example for the rest of the world.
In contrast, China faces severe economic issues and — under the dual pressure of the US trade war and military strength — the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is even less capable of launching an attack on Taiwan.
Taiwan needs to maintain its national defense capabilities and close cooperation with the US. That, coupled with the dangers in the Taiwan Strait, greatly lessens the likelihood of a CCP invasion.
Beijing can only rely on pro-China KMT legislators to pass legislation and wage cognitive warfare to undermine the public’s will to resist communism and defend Taiwan. The CCP aims to achieve victory over Taiwan without ever engaging in combat.
If China invaded Taiwan and its sovereignty fell into the CCP’s hands, Beijing would undoubtedly use it as a strategic foothold against the US. At that point, Taiwan would be pushed to the frontlines of a war with the US.
Taiwanese would lose their freedoms, property and human rights. Military personnel, public servants and educators would face political purges and be sent to “re-education” camps. Chinese would flood in like a massive army of ants, overwhelming Taiwan’s borders. Taiwanese would live their lives surrounded by Chinese, who would compete for healthcare resources, drive up real-estate prices and shock Taiwan’s economy.
If the DPP and supporters of the recall campaign use such talking points as the focus of their messaging and strengthen their outreach, they could debunk the KMT’s false narrative and dispel any doubts held by moderate voters. That would lead to the successful recall of KMT legislators, thereby preventing the Legislative Yuan from continuing to serve as a platform for collusion with the CCP. If successful, the recall would allow for the passage of anti-communist legislation aimed at protecting Taiwan and building a stable foundation for Taiwan’s long term stability.
Michael Lin is a retired diplomat, formerly posted in the US.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance. It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) held a news conference to celebrate his party’s success in surviving Saturday’s mass recall vote, shortly after the final results were confirmed. While the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) would have much preferred a different result, it was not a defeat for the DPP in the same sense that it was a victory for the KMT: Only KMT legislators were facing recalls. That alone should have given Chu cause to reflect, acknowledge any fault, or perhaps even consider apologizing to his party and the nation. However, based on his speech, Chu showed
RSS