Weather is not climate, and a heat wave is not proof of human-induced global warming any more than a snowball disproves it. At the same time, nothing quite focuses the mind on the causes and effects of a hotter planet than nature covering half of the US with a giant pot lid, turning up the burner and letting it boil for a while.
Thanks to a massive heat dome squatting on North America for most of the week, nearly 150 million Americans in 28 states were under some level of heat advisory from the US National Weather Service as of Monday morning. More than 91 million people from Iowa to New York City face the highest level of alert, “extreme heat,” with heat indices in the triple digits, through at least Wednesday.
Of course, there have always been heat waves. Summer is hot, as the climate change deniers in my inbox reliably remind me. However, an increasingly chaotic climate makes heat waves more likely and intense.
Illustration: Mountain People
The heat dome gripping the US this week is partly due to a mundane weather phenomenon — stalled high pressure — but it was made up to five times more likely by the fact that the atmosphere is simply hotter, nonprofit research group Climate Central said. It has only been a year since the “heat blob” that tormented 150 million Americans. Earlier this month, Alaska experienced its first-ever heat advisory.
And if these are the summer scorchers we can expect when the world has only warmed, say, 1.3°C above preindustrial averages, then just imagine what they would be like if and when we reach 3°C of heating, the course we are currently on. Merely hitting 2°C would turn “1000-year” heat waves such as the one that hit the Pacific Northwest four years ago into events that happen once every five to 10 years, the nonprofit research group World Weather Attribution has estimated.
“One of easiest ways to see climate change’s impact is in how it’s increasing the chance these types of heat waves will occur,” Climate Central climate scientist Zachary Labe said. “By the middle of this century, these types of heat waves will be normal. The extremes will be even higher.”
Most alarming to Labe and other scientists is the rise in the number of nights when the temperature fails to cool enough to give overheated human bodies, buildings and infrastructure any relief — a misery many parts of the country will experience firsthand this week. Here again, climate change’s influence is strong. Between 1970 and 2023, average summer minimum temperatures rose by 1.5°C, on average, in 230 US locations studied by Climate Central.
Temperatures that stay so high for so long impose heavy costs on human health and prosperity. Deaths, illnesses and emergency room visits surge.
Nearly 22,000 people died from heat between 1999 and 2023, with the death rate spiking since 2016, reversing years of relative stability, according to a study last year in the journal of the American Medical Association. Heat takes more lives every year than any other weather-related disaster.
And keep in mind official tallies of heat deaths are always undercounting. Heat worsens heart disease and other deadly ailments without leaving traces, meaning it often escapes mention on death certificates.
Extreme heat that lasts all night also strains power supplies as people blast air-conditioners and fans around the clock. The US’ biggest power utility, PJM Interconnection LLC, which serves 65 million people across a swath of the eastern US, has warned this heat wave could push energy demand to its highest levels since at least July 2013. That would keep boosting prices for already expensive electricity. It also increases the risk of brownouts and blackouts, compounding the danger. A heat wave coupled with power failures after Hurricane Beryl last year left Houston-area emergency rooms packed with patients in a grim echo of the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Overheated people, streets, train lines and power grids impose economic costs beyond medical bills and lost lives. Extreme heat gouged US productivity by US$100 billion in 2020, the “purposely conservative” estimate of the Atlantic Council’s Climate Resilience Center showed, a toll expected to rise to US$500 billion per year by 2050.
If we were taking this issue seriously, we would stop burning fossil fuels as quickly as possible, curbing the emissions of greenhouse gases cooking the atmosphere. Meanwhile, we would help states, towns, power suppliers and businesses better prepare for heat waves by planting green spaces, opening cooling centers, hardening infrastructure, conserving energy and checking on vulnerable people to make sure they are safe.
In that fantasy world, the federal government might even declare these events natural disasters, because that is what they are, making dollars available for relief and preparation. Maybe we could even give them memorable names — Heat Wave Exxon, say. We would pump money into climate science to help predict them further in advance, giving us more time to save lives.
In our harsh reality, the climate change deniers running the US government are doing none of the above. In fact, as part of his whole-of-government attack on climate action, US President Donald Trump is doing everything in his power to make heat waves more brutal and costly: The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Heat Strategy, launched just last year to prepare for heat events, has shut down. Most members of an interagency working group on extreme heat have quit. Layoffs at the National Weather Service, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Health and Human Services and other agencies have made emergency response and preparation more difficult. Federal money for local resilience and climate studies is frozen.
And that is just a sampling; a report Monday from the Federation of American Scientists has the whole depressing list of the ways the US is deeply unprepared for this and future heat waves, if you have time and the stomach to read it. Some state and local governments are taking heroic steps to protect their citizens, but stretched budgets only go so far.
As hot as this summer would be, it is also one of the coolest we would ever enjoy again. Just how much hotter and more destructive future summers would become is still in our control.
Mark Gongloff is a Bloomberg Opinion editor and columnist covering climate change. He previously worked for Fortune.com, the Huffington Post and the Wall Street Journal. This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
The Hong Kong government on Monday gazetted sweeping amendments to the implementation rules of Article 43 of its National Security Law. There was no legislative debate, no public consultation and no transition period. By the time the ink dried on the gazette, the new powers were already in force. This move effectively bypassed Hong Kong’s Legislative Council. The rules were enacted by the Hong Kong chief executive, in conjunction with the Committee for Safeguarding National Security — a body shielded from judicial review and accountable only to Beijing. What is presented as “procedural refinement” is, in substance, a shift away from
The shifting geopolitical tectonic plates of this year have placed Beijing in a profound strategic dilemma. As Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prepares for a high-stakes summit with US President Donald Trump, the traditional power dynamics of the China-Japan-US triangle have been destabilized by the diplomatic success of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in Washington. For the Chinese leadership, the anxiety is two-fold: There is a visceral fear of being encircled by a hardened security alliance, and a secondary risk of being left in a vulnerable position by a transactional deal between Washington and Tokyo that might inadvertently empower Japan
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
RSS