Taiwan should step up efforts to negotiate tax exemptions or a reduced tax rate on semiconductors and chip manufacturing equipment with the US, as the impending levies under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act are expected to have a greater impact on Taiwan’s economy than the 20 percent “reciprocal” tariff, particularly given that 80 percent of Taiwan’s exports to the US last year were affected.
The economic impact is expected to intensify, as taxes on chips and chip manufacturing tools could reduce shipments from next year, particularly as exports to the US continue to grow rapidly.
Last month, exports to the US surged 87.4 percent year-on-year, reaching a record US$15.52 billion, driven by growth in semiconductors and artificial intelligence (AI)-related applications, mainly servers, Ministry of Finance data showed. In the first five months of this year, the US accounted for 26.8 percent of exports.
The US Department of Commerce is scheduled to announce the results of its investigations into sectors deemed critical to national security, including semiconductors, pharmaceuticals and critical minerals, in the next few weeks. The semiconductor levies could be substantial, ranging from 25 to 100 percent, as US President Donald Trump has indicated, in efforts to reshore more chip manufacturing.
During the Commerce Department’s probes, about 20 items, ranging from semiconductors and graphic cards to servers, were exempted from taxes, while networking products and printed circuit boards were subject to a 10 percent import tax, the Ministry of Economic Affairs said.
The impact could be substantial if import tariffs on semiconductors are based on their place of origin, as a majority of advanced chips, particularly those produced by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), are shipped to the US from Taiwan. That includes 3-nanometer, 4-nanometer, as well as the new-generation 2-nanometer chips used in premium electronics such as iPhones and AI servers.
In a letter to the Commerce Department, TSMC said that tariffs or other restrictive measures on US imports of end products and semi-finished goods could reduce the profitability of its US customers and increase production costs, which would lower demand for their products and TSMC’s chips. Major TSMC clients such as Nvidia Corp, Advanced Micro Devices Inc and Apple Inc could be affected.
Tariffs on semiconductor equipment could further elevate chip manufacturing costs in the US, as some equipment TSMC procures from US suppliers, such as Applied Materials, would still be subject to levies, as the machines are not manufactured in the US, TSMC said earlier this month.
“Diminished demand could create uncertainty around the timeline for the construction and operation of our Arizona fabs,” TSMC said in the letter.
In addition, tariffs on semiconductors and semiconductor manufacturing tools could upend global chip supply chains, as chip equipment and related suppliers face growing pressure to establish new production lines in the US to avoid levies.
As the tariff negotiations are conducted on a bilateral basis, Taiwanese trade representatives should be well-prepared and develop compelling proposals to secure the best terms, as the semiconductor industry is a key pillar of the nation’s economy. Simply matching tax rates with Taiwan’s peers, such as South Korea and Japan, might not be enough.
Some officials from the Ministry of Economic Affairs believe this could suffice for Taiwan’s semiconductor companies, given their technological competitiveness and resilience, but — TSMC excluded — most semiconductor-related firms in Taiwan struggle to compete with their Asian counterparts and a favorable tax rate would improve their competitiveness.
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) on Wednesday last week announced it is launching investigations into 16 US trading partners, including Taiwan, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to determine whether they have engaged in unfair trade practices, such as overproduction. A day later, the agency announced a separate Section 301 investigation into 60 economies based on the implementation of measures to prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor. Several of Taiwan’s main trading rivals — including China, Japan, South Korea and the EU — also made the US’ investigation list. The announcements come
Taiwan is not invited to the table. It never has been, but this year, with the Philippines holding the ASEAN chair, the question that matters is no longer who gets formally named, it is who becomes structurally indispensable. The “one China” formula continues to do its job. It sets the outer boundary of official diplomatic speech, and no one in the region has a serious interest in openly challenging it. However, beneath the surface, something is thickening. Trade corridors, digital infrastructure, artificial intelligence (AI) cooperation, supply chains, cross-border investment: The connective tissue between Taiwan and ASEAN is quietly and methodically growing