June marks Pride Month, a time of celebratory parades, parties and rainbow-drenched gatherings across the US. This month also marks the 10th anniversary of the Obergefell v Hodges decision — the landmark US Supreme Court ruling that legalized same-sex marriage in every state.
That case, which included several same-sex couples — some with children — ushered in an increased acceptance, visibility and, frankly, comfort level among members of the LGBTQ community and their families.
In subsequent years, the support for marriage equality ticked up among all groups, most starkly among Republicans, who for years ran as defenders of traditional marriage, supporting only unions between one man and one woman.
Illustration: Louise Ting
The trend saw Republican support reach 55 percent in May of 2021 and 2022 — a peak and up from 37 percent in May 2015 — according to a Gallup poll tracking the party’s alignment with same-sex marriage.
However, something has shifted in the past few years.
As happens with social progress, there has been a concerted and successful backlash to LGBTQ equality, driven by conservatives.
Gallup found a clear erosion in support of same-sex marriage among Republicans, with only 41 percent supporting it today, a 14 point drop in just three years. That decrease dovetails with findings that only 38 percent of Republicans now say same-sex relations are morally acceptable, down from 56 percent in 2022.
Overall, 68 percent of Americans support same-sex marriage, including 88 percent of Democrats and 76 percent of independents. The path to that level of acceptance took nearly 30 years — in 1996, when Gallup began tracking, only 27 percent of US adults approved.
However, the fight for LGBTQ equality has stretched far beyond three decades — a struggle marked by courage and persistence. Any sign of backtracking threatens to deny LGBTQ Americans and their families “equal dignity in the eyes of the law,” to quote Justice Anthony Kennedy, who wrote the Obergefell decision.
The downward trend in support should come as no surprise. The war on “woke” specifically targeted LGTBQ people, not just transgender girls who want to play sports. Gay people, their history, traditions, status and culture have been targeted for erasure, whether in the form of book bans or attacks on drag queen story hour.
The US Department of Defense erased images that contained “gay” as a keyword in an effort to purge any trace of diversity, equality and inclusion (DEI).
US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth reportedly plans to strip gay civil rights leader and navy veteran Harvey Milk’s name from a ship. Companies such as Target Corp, once willing to dedicate parts of their stores to pride merchandise, began a retreat last year, fearful of a conservative backlash. And several companies scaled back or declined to renew their sponsorship of pride events this year.
Buoyed by the overturning of Roe v Wade, the Southern Baptist Convention voted earlier this month to legally fight to end same-sex marriage, putting the weight of the nation’s largest Protestant denomination behind the effort. Conservative legislators in at least four states, including Michigan and Montana, are pressing the Supreme Court to revisit same-sex marriage, passing resolutions that argue the issue should be left up to states.
The case of Kim Davis — a Kentucky court clerk who refused to issue a gay couple a marriage license over religious grounds — could make its way to the Supreme Court.
A Christian legal group, Liberty Counsel, plans to ask the court to hear her case with the aim of overturning Obergefell, which was decided 5-4.
“At least three sitting Supreme Court Justices (which includes Chief Justice Roberts) expressly wrote that the Obergefell opinion has no basis in the [US] constitution, meaning we have an excellent chance of overturning the case,” wrote Mat Staver, founder and chairman of the group, in a fundraising letter.
In his 2022 concurring opinion in Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote that the court, now dominated by conservatives, should reconsider its prior rulings on same-sex marriage, given that the related case law was built on the same arguments that supported abortion rights.
In response, Congress passed the Respect for Marriage Act a few months later, which requires that states recognize same-sex marriages performed in other states. What that law does not do is require every state to conduct same-sex ceremonies, or explicitly establish marriage as a fundamental right.
Conservatives worked for decades to overturn the right to abortion by backing dozens of cases that slowly chipped away at choice, creating a patchwork of laws, some draconian, state by state.
Nearly two dozen states have now banned or severely restricted abortion. Conservatives have signaled they want a similar fight to overturn marriage equality. This time, liberals and supporters of LGBTQ rights should take them seriously and fight accordingly to protect marriage as a fundamental right for all.
Nia-Malika Henderson is a politics and policy columnist for Bloomberg Opinion. A former senior political reporter for CNN and the Washington Post, she has covered politics and campaigns for almost two decades. This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) concludes his fourth visit to China since leaving office, Taiwan finds itself once again trapped in a familiar cycle of political theater. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has criticized Ma’s participation in the Straits Forum as “dancing with Beijing,” while the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) defends it as an act of constitutional diplomacy. Both sides miss a crucial point: The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world. The disagreement reduces Taiwan’s
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is visiting China, where he is addressed in a few ways, but never as a former president. On Sunday, he attended the Straits Forum in Xiamen, not as a former president of Taiwan, but as a former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman. There, he met with Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧). Presumably, Wang at least would have been aware that Ma had once been president, and yet he did not mention that fact, referring to him only as “Mr Ma Ying-jeou.” Perhaps the apparent oversight was not intended to convey a lack of
RSS