Taiwan is often compared to other countries, but never to Spain.
Yet the two countries have, in many ways, followed a similar path toward democracy. That makes the comparison interesting.
Both nations face a paradox: They successfully abolished dictatorship without erasing the illegality of the regime that preceded them. There was no revolution. No tyrant was toppled. No legitimate government in exile came back. They were reformed from the inside, and the people rolled with it, because, when you are finally free from oppression, technicalities matter little.
Let us break down the facts.
The elected, democratically legitimate government of the Spanish Republic was overthrown in 1939, when the Nationalist rebels of Francisco Franco declared victory. Taiwan was handed over to the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) of Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) in 1945, and he asserted his power through force against the Taiwanese population. Both regimes received international diplomatic recognition.
Toward the end of his rule in 1969, Franco co-opted the heir of the former Spanish monarchy, Juan Carlos, as his designated successor. In Taiwan, Chiang’s son, former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國), who had inherited the presidency, put Taiwan-born Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) first in the line of succession by appointing him vice president in 1984.
In both cases, the authoritarian ruler died, and the successor automatically inherited extensive powers: in 1975 for Juan Carlos (now king) and in 1988 for Lee.
In both cases, they relinquished those powers in favor of democracy, when they could easily have carried on as dictators.
Juan Carlos presided over the reforms that made Spain into the parliamentary democracy it is today. Lee put an end to the KMT’s dictatorship and called for elections. Both were praised for allowing their countries to embrace human rights and freedom without bloodshed.
However, both also came from within the authoritarian regimes that had buried these values for decades.
Taiwan and Spain share a lack of rupture between the oppressive regime and its democratic successor. Both still use the flag once associated with dictatorship.
The Spanish and Taiwanese enjoy freedom and human rights, and on a practical level, that is more important than symbolic correctness. However, it also means carrying a legacy of silence and real difficulty when it comes to transitional justice.
Juan Carlos and Lee navigated dangerous environments. They worked to bring democracy and freedom, but were careful not to provoke the authoritarian elements still in place — elements that could have destroyed the entire project if pushed too far.
We know Lee had to ensure hardliners would not depose him in the early years of his presidency. We saw Spain face a coup attempt in 1981, when old Francoists stormed the Spanish parliament. Juan Carlos and Lee could have been murdered by nostalgia-driven apparatchiks. They were not entirely free to do what they wanted.
However, both countries are now free. For most people, that is what matters.
However, those with personal scars are still grieving, and both countries still struggle with the weight of that legacy. Spain has its “pact of forgetting.” Taiwan is notorious for the difficulty it encounters in navigating transitional justice.
So, what to make of it?
The comparison has its limits. For one, Spain is not threatened by an external power. However, a country does not need to be entirely similar to Taiwan to offer meaningful perspective.
The point of this piece is not to offer a full-fledged analysis of what Taiwan can learn from Spain. That would require its own feature and a much more exhaustive investigation.
Rather, it is to remind readers that Taiwan should not be viewed in isolation. We too often make two mistakes: One is to compare Taiwan only to the usual cases (other Asian countries, or nations shaped by Cold War legacies); the other is to assume that Taiwan’s problems are unique and that no other country can offer inspiration.
Thinking outside the box is more fruitful. Many countries, including some that seem very different at first glance, have undergone similar transitions that can help enrich Taiwan’s ongoing democratic debate. If Taiwan needs anything today, it is precisely that: a broader, more global mindset.
Julien Oeuillet is a journalist in Taiwan. He is the founding editor of Indo-Pacific Open News. He also writes and produces radio and television programs for several English-language publications globally.
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
Taiwan is rapidly accelerating toward becoming a “super-aged society” — moving at one of the fastest rates globally — with the proportion of elderly people in the population sharply rising. While the demographic shift of “fewer births than deaths” is no longer an anomaly, the nation’s legal framework and social customs appear stuck in the last century. Without adjustments, incidents like last month’s viral kicking incident on the Taipei MRT involving a 73-year-old woman would continue to proliferate, sowing seeds of generational distrust and conflict. The Senior Citizens Welfare Act (老人福利法), originally enacted in 1980 and revised multiple times, positions older
Taiwan’s business-friendly environment and science parks designed to foster technology industries are the key elements of the nation’s winning chip formula, inspiring the US and other countries to try to replicate it. Representatives from US business groups — such as the Greater Phoenix Economic Council, and the Arizona-Taiwan Trade and Investment Office — in July visited the Hsinchu Science Park (新竹科學園區), home to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) headquarters and its first fab. They showed great interest in creating similar science parks, with aims to build an extensive semiconductor chain suitable for the US, with chip designing, packaging and manufacturing. The
RSS