Nvidia chief executive officer Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) in a speech on May 24 said that “Taiwan should definitely invest in nuclear energy.”
A few days earlier, on May 20, a referendum proposal backed by Taiwan’s opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party, on restarting the No. 2 reactor, only decommissioned on May 17, of the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County, was passed.
What Huang said exactly was, in fact: “Taiwan should definitely invest in nuclear energy. Energy should not be stigmatized. We need all forms of energy, including wind, solar and nuclear.”
That means, renewable energy and nuclear energy are both options for the power-hungry artificial intelligence (AI) sector.
However, the KMT uses Europe and the US as examples to advocate that Taiwan should keep up with the “world trend of reducing carbon, but not nuclear energy.”
Such a comparison ignores the fact that Taiwan is in the Pacific Rim seismic belt, and the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant was built on the Hengchun fault, making the plant significantly riskier than nuclear power plants in Europe and the US.
Japan, which is also in the seismic belt, promulgated new nuclear safety standards after the disaster at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant in 2011, regulating that any nuclear power plant built on an active fault is not allowed to operate.
On Aug. 28 last year the Japanese Nuclear Regulation Authority ruled that Tsuruga 2, the second reactor of the Tsuruga nuclear power plant, falls short of the new safety standards and cannot resume operations on due to the risks of an active fault below the reactor.
In addition, International Energy Agency data show that the cost of extending the service life of a nuclear power plant is as high as US$500 to US$1,100 per kilowatt-hour, and it continues to rise.
Investment in renewable energy worldwide reached US$728 billion last year, which is about 10 times that of nuclear energy.
Technological advances have reduced the cost of solar photovoltaics by more than 30 percent in the past two years, while nuclear power has gradually lost its economic competitiveness due to high construction costs, long construction periods and high risks.
Huang’s speech highlights the AI industry’s demand for energy. To achieve its goal of utilizing 100 percent renewable energy by this year, it is estimated that Nvidia’s annual green electricity demand in Taiwan would exceed 10 billion kilowatt-hours, close to one-third of Taiwan’s total green electricity generation last year.
Nvidia has established a huge supply chain in Taiwan and therefore has significant bargaining power to negotiate with the government about renewable energy policies other than nuclear power investment.
Google pushed the government to revise the Electricity Act (電業法) in 2017 to allow companies to directly purchase renewable energy, laying an important foundation for the liberalization of the green electricity market.
Since Google can do it, there is no reason why Nvidia — given its global scale and influence — cannot get its supply chain to use 100 percent renewable energy by 2030, creating a win-win situation for Taiwan’s industry and energy transformation.
Lena Chang is a Taipei-based climate and energy campaigner at Greenpeace East Asia.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) on Wednesday last week announced it is launching investigations into 16 US trading partners, including Taiwan, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to determine whether they have engaged in unfair trade practices, such as overproduction. A day later, the agency announced a separate Section 301 investigation into 60 economies based on the implementation of measures to prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor. Several of Taiwan’s main trading rivals — including China, Japan, South Korea and the EU — also made the US’ investigation list. The announcements come
Taiwan is not invited to the table. It never has been, but this year, with the Philippines holding the ASEAN chair, the question that matters is no longer who gets formally named, it is who becomes structurally indispensable. The “one China” formula continues to do its job. It sets the outer boundary of official diplomatic speech, and no one in the region has a serious interest in openly challenging it. However, beneath the surface, something is thickening. Trade corridors, digital infrastructure, artificial intelligence (AI) cooperation, supply chains, cross-border investment: The connective tissue between Taiwan and ASEAN is quietly and methodically growing
RSS