For years, Taiwan’s university entrance system has provided bonus points to indigenous students, a policy originally designed as a form of affirmative action. While well-intentioned, this mechanism has gradually become a label that undermines the credibility and dignity of young indigenous people.
Many capable indigenous students carry the silent burden of a single damaging assumption: “Did you get in because of bonus points?”
Such remarks are not merely casual comments — they reflect a deeper, institutionalized prejudice that reduces a person’s identity to a bureaucratic advantage.
Fairness cannot be achieved by adjusting scores at the finish line. By equating “ethnic identity” with “academic deficiency,” the system implies that indigenous students cannot compete without special treatment. This mindset infantilizes and stigmatizes an entire community.
It is time to end this outdated practice and replace it with more empowering and equity-based alternatives.
The government should invest in foundational education by bolstering resources in indigenous communities through better teaching support, digital access and culturally relevant curricula — starting from elementary levels.
Second, it should create culture-based admission pathways, encouraging indigenous students to gain recognition through language proficiency, cultural projects or service contributions, showcasing their strength, rather than relying on compensatory mechanisms.
Third, it should reward social impact, not just identity. It could offer scholarships or debt forgiveness to indigenous people who contribute to their communities through teaching, environmental stewardship or cultural work.
We do not want sympathy — we want respect. We are not a bonus; we are a future force. Let us move beyond tokenism and work toward genuine equality in education.
Tu Hsin-fu is an indigenous affairs advocate.
A response to my article (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” Aug. 12, page 8) mischaracterizes my arguments, as well as a speech by former British prime minister Boris Johnson at the Ketagalan Forum in Taipei early last month. Tseng Yueh-ying (曾月英) in the response (“A misreading of Johnson’s speech,” Aug. 24, page 8) does not dispute that Johnson referred repeatedly to Taiwan as “a segment of the Chinese population,” but asserts that the phrase challenged Beijing by questioning whether parts of “the Chinese population” could be “differently Chinese.” This is essentially a confirmation of Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formulation, which says that
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
Media said that several pan-blue figures — among them former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱), former KMT legislator Lee De-wei (李德維), former KMT Central Committee member Vincent Hsu (徐正文), New Party Chairman Wu Cheng-tien (吳成典), former New Party legislator Chou chuan (周荃) and New Party Deputy Secretary-General You Chih-pin (游智彬) — yesterday attended the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) military parade commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II. China’s Xinhua news agency reported that foreign leaders were present alongside Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), such as Russian President Vladimir Putin, North Korean leader Kim
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) is expected to be summoned by the Taipei City Police Department after a rally in Taipei on Saturday last week resulted in injuries to eight police officers. The Ministry of the Interior on Sunday said that police had collected evidence of obstruction of public officials and coercion by an estimated 1,000 “disorderly” demonstrators. The rally — led by Huang to mark one year since a raid by Taipei prosecutors on then-TPP chairman and former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) — might have contravened the Assembly and Parade Act (集會遊行法), as the organizers had
RSS