For years, Taiwan’s university entrance system has provided bonus points to indigenous students, a policy originally designed as a form of affirmative action. While well-intentioned, this mechanism has gradually become a label that undermines the credibility and dignity of young indigenous people.
Many capable indigenous students carry the silent burden of a single damaging assumption: “Did you get in because of bonus points?”
Such remarks are not merely casual comments — they reflect a deeper, institutionalized prejudice that reduces a person’s identity to a bureaucratic advantage.
Fairness cannot be achieved by adjusting scores at the finish line. By equating “ethnic identity” with “academic deficiency,” the system implies that indigenous students cannot compete without special treatment. This mindset infantilizes and stigmatizes an entire community.
It is time to end this outdated practice and replace it with more empowering and equity-based alternatives.
The government should invest in foundational education by bolstering resources in indigenous communities through better teaching support, digital access and culturally relevant curricula — starting from elementary levels.
Second, it should create culture-based admission pathways, encouraging indigenous students to gain recognition through language proficiency, cultural projects or service contributions, showcasing their strength, rather than relying on compensatory mechanisms.
Third, it should reward social impact, not just identity. It could offer scholarships or debt forgiveness to indigenous people who contribute to their communities through teaching, environmental stewardship or cultural work.
We do not want sympathy — we want respect. We are not a bonus; we are a future force. Let us move beyond tokenism and work toward genuine equality in education.
Tu Hsin-fu is an indigenous affairs advocate.
Eating at a breakfast shop the other day, I turned to an old man sitting at the table next to mine. “Hey, did you hear that the Legislative Yuan passed a bill to give everyone NT$10,000 [US$340]?” I said, pointing to a newspaper headline. The old man cursed, then said: “Yeah, the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] canceled the NT$100 billion subsidy for Taiwan Power Co and announced they would give everyone NT$10,000 instead. “Nice. Now they are saying that if electricity prices go up, we can just use that cash to pay for it,” he said. “I have no time for drivel like
Young supporters of former Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) were detained for posting the names and photographs of judges and prosecutors believed to be overseeing the Core Pacific City redevelopment corruption case. The supporters should be held responsible for their actions. As for Ko’s successor, TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), he should reflect on whether his own comments are provocative and whether his statements might be misunderstood. Huang needs to apologize to the public and the judiciary. In the article, “Why does sorry seem to be the hardest word?” the late political commentator Nan Fang Shuo (南方朔) wrote
Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) reportedly told the EU’s top diplomat that China does not want Russia to lose in Ukraine, because the US could shift its focus to countering Beijing. Wang made the comment while meeting with EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas on July 2 at the 13th China-EU High-Level Strategic Dialogue in Brussels, the South China Morning Post and CNN reported. Although contrary to China’s claim of neutrality in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, such a frank remark suggests Beijing might prefer a protracted war to keep the US from focusing on
There are no obvious connections between the 7-Eleven retail chain in Japan and the Philippines’ national security concerns in the South China Sea. Here is one, one that also takes in Canadian Broadcasting Corp (CBC), the government of Denmark and Taiwanese plastic surgeons on the way. Japan’s 7-Eleven on Friday last week posted on social media an image of uniforms worn by the chain store’s employees in various locations, including Taiwan, the US, Hawaii, Australia, Sweden, Denmark, Cambodia and the Philippines. If this was intended to promote a sense of camaraderie within the 7-Eleven family, it backfired. Taiwan was tagged with the