For years, Taiwan’s university entrance system has provided bonus points to indigenous students, a policy originally designed as a form of affirmative action. While well-intentioned, this mechanism has gradually become a label that undermines the credibility and dignity of young indigenous people.
Many capable indigenous students carry the silent burden of a single damaging assumption: “Did you get in because of bonus points?”
Such remarks are not merely casual comments — they reflect a deeper, institutionalized prejudice that reduces a person’s identity to a bureaucratic advantage.
Fairness cannot be achieved by adjusting scores at the finish line. By equating “ethnic identity” with “academic deficiency,” the system implies that indigenous students cannot compete without special treatment. This mindset infantilizes and stigmatizes an entire community.
It is time to end this outdated practice and replace it with more empowering and equity-based alternatives.
The government should invest in foundational education by bolstering resources in indigenous communities through better teaching support, digital access and culturally relevant curricula — starting from elementary levels.
Second, it should create culture-based admission pathways, encouraging indigenous students to gain recognition through language proficiency, cultural projects or service contributions, showcasing their strength, rather than relying on compensatory mechanisms.
Third, it should reward social impact, not just identity. It could offer scholarships or debt forgiveness to indigenous people who contribute to their communities through teaching, environmental stewardship or cultural work.
We do not want sympathy — we want respect. We are not a bonus; we are a future force. Let us move beyond tokenism and work toward genuine equality in education.
Tu Hsin-fu is an indigenous affairs advocate.
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
Last month, two major diplomatic events unfolded in Southeast Asia that suggested subtle shifts in the region’s strategic landscape. The 46th ASEAN Summit and the inaugural ASEAN-Gulf-Cooperation Council (GCC)-China Trilateral Summit in Kuala Lumpur coincided with French President Emmanuel Macron’s high-profile visits to Vietnam, Indonesia and Singapore. Together, they highlighted ASEAN’s maturing global posture, deepening regional integration and China’s intensifying efforts to recalibrate its economic diplomacy amid uncertainties posed by the US. The ASEAN summit took place amid rising protectionist policies from the US, notably sweeping tariffs on goods from Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam, with duties as high as 49 percent.