From Tuesday to Wednesday last week, more than 142 participants, largely comprised of parliamentarians from 29 countries, took part in the World Parliamentarians’ Convention on Tibet (WPCT) in Tokyo. This was the ninth such convention, with the first one held in New Delhi in 1994.
The convention brings together lawmakers from democratic nations around the world to discuss Tibet and how they can best spotlight its dispute with China and eventually resolve it.
The WPCT was cohosted by the Tibetan parliament in exile (the legislative wing of the Central Tibetan Administration) and the Japanese Parliamentary Support Group for Tibet.
Twelve sessions took place, including the inaugural and the closing sessions. Penpa Tsering, sikyong of the Central Tibetan Administration, and other Tibetan delegations also took part in the deliberations. The participants all unanimously came out with three important resolutions: the Tokyo Declaration, the Resolution on Celebrating the Legacy of His Holiness the 14th Dalai Lama on his 90th Birthday and the 9th WPCT Region-Wise Action Plans on Tibet.
The resolutions tie together the essence of the convention and acknowledge the growing support for Tibet. It also touched upon the issue of Tibet’s sovereignty, which they recognize as a historically independent nation before the forceful and illegal occupation by the People’s Republic of China (PRC) in 1950.
An entire resolution was dedicated to the 14th Dalai Lama — celebrating his legacy of compassion, nonviolence and universal ethics. There was much emphasis on his 90th birthday and this resolution consisted of six major points. One of them is the reaffirmation of “the sole and exclusive authority over the reincarnation of the 14th Dalai Lama with His Holiness himself and with Gaden Phodrang Trust.” This indicates the significance and importance of the reincarnation of the Dalai Lama, which would be clarified during the Dalai Lama’s 90th birthday on July 6.
The collective resolutions also highlight the situation in Tibet and how Beijing continues to contravene the human rights of Tibetans. It also calls upon parliaments, governments and UN organizations to raise the issue of Tibet, and commended actions that have been taken, such as the 2024 Resolve Tibet Act.
When the meeting was held, there was much uproar from Beijing, with the Global Times publishing two articles on June 3 and 5 that included statements from the Chinese embassy in Japan.
It expressed strong dissatisfaction over the convention, criticized the Dalai Lama and the Central Tibetan Administration, which it referred to as the “Tibetan government-in-exile,” and said that Tibet should be referred to by its Chinese name, Xizang (西藏), that the reincarnation of the Dalai Lama should abide by Chinese national laws and regulations, and that Tibet’s economy is booming and people’s lives are improving.
What is fascinating is how the resolutions all engage with the narratives that Beijing came out with at the Global Times.
With this back and forth between Tibet and the PRC, Beijing confirmed the significance of the ninth WPCT.
Taiwan could also host the convention, as it has an engaging Taiwan Parliamentary Group for Tibet — the 11th such group, formed on May 20 last year in Taipei. Furthermore, it would continue until the Tibet-China dispute is resolved, with the international community, including the lawmakers of democratic nations, supporting the resolution of this dispute.
Tenzing Dhamdul is a senior researcher at the Foundation for Non-Violent Alternatives in New Delhi.
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised eyebrows recently when he declared the era of American unipolarity over. He described America’s unrivaled dominance of the international system as an anomaly that was created by the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. Now, he observed, the United States was returning to a more multipolar world where there are great powers in different parts of the planet. He pointed to China and Russia, as well as “rogue states like Iran and North Korea” as examples of countries the United States must contend with. This all begs the question:
In China, competition is fierce, and in many cases suppliers do not get paid on time. Rather than improving, the situation appears to be deteriorating. BYD Co, the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer by production volume, has gained notoriety for its harsh treatment of suppliers, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability. The case also highlights the decline of China’s business environment, and the growing risk of a cascading wave of corporate failures. BYD generally does not follow China’s Negotiable Instruments Law when settling payments with suppliers. Instead the company has created its own proprietary supply chain finance system called the “D-chain,” through which
RSS