Treading an independent path between two superpowers in a fracturing world was never going to be easy. The Labour Party government of British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has not been deflected from its pursuit of better economic relations with China, even after US President Donald Trump started a tariff offensive aimed at isolating the US’ biggest rival. A two-century-old Georgian building opposite the Tower of London might be where the wheels finally come off the UK’s delicate maneuvering.
The White House has warned the British government against allowing a Chinese embassy to be situated at the former Royal Mint, the Sunday Times reported. The newspaper cited a senior US official as saying it was “deeply concerned” about giving China potential access to nearby communications cables that are critical to the UK’s financial-services industry. Politicians in the Netherlands have also raised concerns over the potential impact that Chinese interceptions of data traffic could have on the security and integrity of Dutch financial institutions.
China has previously dismissed espionage concerns as groundless and slander.
Illustration: Mountain People
It is the US intervention that matters. In its eagerness to foster trade and investment links with the world’s second-largest economy, Labour has appeared impervious to the many signs that the plan is a bad idea. These include, for one thing, its improbable size: close to 10 times the gross floor area of China’s existing embassy in Portland Place to the west. No convincing explanation has been put forward for why the complex needs to be so large — probably because this is not a planning consideration.
However, it is a relevant factor for national security, given China’s record of hacking critical infrastructure and extra-legal activities such as running unofficial police stations abroad. The site would be the biggest diplomatic compound in Europe, and a third bigger than Beijing’s embassy in Washington. No wonder some allies are skittish.
Labour looks to have boxed itself into a corner. Had it wanted to, the government could have washed its hands of this plan. After all, the site was sold to China in 2018 under a previous Conservative Party government. Instead, it has signaled pretty clearly that it intends to approve the embassy. Beijing made delivery of its new London base the price of a reset in relations, and Labour took the deal. That was evident in Rio de Janeiro in November last year when Starmer told Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), in front of the cameras at the G20 summit, that his government had “called in” the planning application — taking the decision out of local hands and placing it with British Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner.
The Royal Mint proposal has drawn opposition from local residents, twice been rejected in unanimous votes at Tower Hamlets council, spurred police objections (subsequently withdrawn, after another intervention from Starmer’s ministers), been the focus of protests by Hong Kong emigres and others, and raised misgivings within domestic intelligence agencies. All this could be safely ignored, perhaps, but the stance of the UK’s biggest and most powerful (if recently somewhat erratic) ally is not so easily dismissed.
If the UK needs improved ties with China to meet its mission of kick-starting economic growth, then that is even truer of its relationship with the US. More than one-fifth of the UK’s exports went to the US in 2023, versus 4 percent to China; the US share of British imports was 12.9 percent, close to double the Chinese contribution. After signing a preliminary trade deal with the Trump administration last month, the UK has until July 9 to reach a full agreement or face a 50 percent tariff on steel exports — a threat that, in its requirements for “supply-chain security,” is also partially targeted at China.
Is Labour really in a position to disregard US warnings on the London mega-embassy?
There are caveats. The statement was from an unidentified US official and followed lobbying by the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China, a global cross-party group that has been campaigning against the embassy plan in the UK. It is not clear whether this represents Trump’s thinking — the only voice that ultimately matters — or what the US would do if its warning is not heeded. These are volatile times and things can change.
Coincidentally, US and Chinese officials have been meeting at another Georgian-era mansion across the UK capital near Buckingham Palace. Perhaps they would iron out their trade differences.
However, if a transactional president decides to tie in this perceived security issue to wider trade concerns, the UK might face an uncomfortable choice.
Matthew Brooker is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering business and infrastructure. Formerly, he was an editor for Bloomberg News and the South China Morning Post. This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Chinese state-owned companies COSCO Shipping Corporation and China Merchants have a 30 percent stake in Kaohsiung Port’s Kao Ming Container Terminal (Terminal No. 6) and COSCO leases Berths 65 and 66. It is extremely dangerous to allow Chinese companies or state-owned companies to operate critical infrastructure. Deterrence theorists are familiar with the concepts of deterrence “by punishment” and “by denial.” Deterrence by punishment threatens an aggressor with prohibitive costs (like retaliation or sanctions) that outweigh the benefits of their action, while deterrence by denial aims to make an attack so difficult that it becomes pointless. Elbridge Colby, currently serving as the Under
Apart from the first arms sales approval for Taiwan since US President Donald Trump took office, last month also witnessed another milestone for Taiwan-US relations. Trump signed the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act into law on Tuesday. Its passing without objection in the US Senate underscores how bipartisan US support for Taiwan has evolved. The new law would further help normalize exchanges between Taiwanese and US government officials. We have already seen a flurry of visits to Washington earlier this summer, not only with Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍), but also delegations led by National Security Council Secretary-General Joseph Wu
Ho Ying-lu (何鷹鷺), a Chinese spouse who was a member of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) Central Standing Committee, on Wednesday last week resigned from the KMT, accusing the party of failing to clarify its “one China” policy. In a video released in October, Ho, wearing a T-shirt featuring a portrait of Mao Zedong (毛澤東), said she hoped that Taiwan would “soon return to the embrace of the motherland” and “quickly unify — that is my purpose and my responsibility.” The KMT’s Disciplinary Committee on Nov. 19 announced that Ho had been suspended from her position on the committee, although she was
Two mayors have invited Japanese pop icon Ayumi Hamasaki to perform in their cities after her Shanghai concert was abruptly canceled on Saturday last week, a decision widely interpreted as fallout from the latest political spat between Japan and China. Organizers in Shanghai pulled Hamasaki’s show at the last minute, citing force majeure, a justification that convinced few. The cancelation came shortly after Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi remarked that a Chinese attack on Taiwan could prompt a military response from Tokyo — comments that angered Beijing and triggered a series of retaliatory moves. Hamasaki received an immediate show of support from
RSS