Treading an independent path between two superpowers in a fracturing world was never going to be easy. The Labour Party government of British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has not been deflected from its pursuit of better economic relations with China, even after US President Donald Trump started a tariff offensive aimed at isolating the US’ biggest rival. A two-century-old Georgian building opposite the Tower of London might be where the wheels finally come off the UK’s delicate maneuvering.
The White House has warned the British government against allowing a Chinese embassy to be situated at the former Royal Mint, the Sunday Times reported. The newspaper cited a senior US official as saying it was “deeply concerned” about giving China potential access to nearby communications cables that are critical to the UK’s financial-services industry. Politicians in the Netherlands have also raised concerns over the potential impact that Chinese interceptions of data traffic could have on the security and integrity of Dutch financial institutions.
China has previously dismissed espionage concerns as groundless and slander.
Illustration: Mountain People
It is the US intervention that matters. In its eagerness to foster trade and investment links with the world’s second-largest economy, Labour has appeared impervious to the many signs that the plan is a bad idea. These include, for one thing, its improbable size: close to 10 times the gross floor area of China’s existing embassy in Portland Place to the west. No convincing explanation has been put forward for why the complex needs to be so large — probably because this is not a planning consideration.
However, it is a relevant factor for national security, given China’s record of hacking critical infrastructure and extra-legal activities such as running unofficial police stations abroad. The site would be the biggest diplomatic compound in Europe, and a third bigger than Beijing’s embassy in Washington. No wonder some allies are skittish.
Labour looks to have boxed itself into a corner. Had it wanted to, the government could have washed its hands of this plan. After all, the site was sold to China in 2018 under a previous Conservative Party government. Instead, it has signaled pretty clearly that it intends to approve the embassy. Beijing made delivery of its new London base the price of a reset in relations, and Labour took the deal. That was evident in Rio de Janeiro in November last year when Starmer told Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), in front of the cameras at the G20 summit, that his government had “called in” the planning application — taking the decision out of local hands and placing it with British Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner.
The Royal Mint proposal has drawn opposition from local residents, twice been rejected in unanimous votes at Tower Hamlets council, spurred police objections (subsequently withdrawn, after another intervention from Starmer’s ministers), been the focus of protests by Hong Kong emigres and others, and raised misgivings within domestic intelligence agencies. All this could be safely ignored, perhaps, but the stance of the UK’s biggest and most powerful (if recently somewhat erratic) ally is not so easily dismissed.
If the UK needs improved ties with China to meet its mission of kick-starting economic growth, then that is even truer of its relationship with the US. More than one-fifth of the UK’s exports went to the US in 2023, versus 4 percent to China; the US share of British imports was 12.9 percent, close to double the Chinese contribution. After signing a preliminary trade deal with the Trump administration last month, the UK has until July 9 to reach a full agreement or face a 50 percent tariff on steel exports — a threat that, in its requirements for “supply-chain security,” is also partially targeted at China.
Is Labour really in a position to disregard US warnings on the London mega-embassy?
There are caveats. The statement was from an unidentified US official and followed lobbying by the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China, a global cross-party group that has been campaigning against the embassy plan in the UK. It is not clear whether this represents Trump’s thinking — the only voice that ultimately matters — or what the US would do if its warning is not heeded. These are volatile times and things can change.
Coincidentally, US and Chinese officials have been meeting at another Georgian-era mansion across the UK capital near Buckingham Palace. Perhaps they would iron out their trade differences.
However, if a transactional president decides to tie in this perceived security issue to wider trade concerns, the UK might face an uncomfortable choice.
Matthew Brooker is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering business and infrastructure. Formerly, he was an editor for Bloomberg News and the South China Morning Post. This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
The government and local industries breathed a sigh of relief after Shin Kong Life Insurance Co last week said it would relinquish surface rights for two plots in Taipei’s Beitou District (北投) to Nvidia Corp. The US chip-design giant’s plan to expand its local presence will be crucial for Taiwan to safeguard its core role in the global artificial intelligence (AI) ecosystem and to advance the nation’s AI development. The land in dispute is owned by the Taipei City Government, which in 2021 sold the rights to develop and use the two plots of land, codenamed T17 and T18, to the
Art and cultural events are key for a city’s cultivation of soft power and international image, and how politicians engage with them often defines their success. Representative to Austria Liu Suan-yung’s (劉玄詠) conducting performance and Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen’s (盧秀燕) show of drumming and the Tainan Jazz Festival demonstrate different outcomes when politics meet culture. While a thoughtful and professional engagement can heighten an event’s status and cultural value, indulging in political theater runs the risk of undermining trust and its reception. During a National Day reception celebration in Austria on Oct. 8, Liu, who was formerly director of the
US President Donald Trump has announced his eagerness to meet North Korean leader Kim Jong-un while in South Korea for the APEC summit. That implies a possible revival of US-North Korea talks, frozen since 2019. While some would dismiss such a move as appeasement, renewed US engagement with North Korea could benefit Taiwan’s security interests. The long-standing stalemate between Washington and Pyongyang has allowed Beijing to entrench its dominance in the region, creating a myth that only China can “manage” Kim’s rogue nation. That dynamic has allowed Beijing to present itself as an indispensable power broker: extracting concessions from Washington, Seoul
Taiwan’s labor force participation rate among people aged 65 or older was only 9.9 percent for 2023 — far lower than in other advanced countries, Ministry of Labor data showed. The rate is 38.3 percent in South Korea, 25.7 percent in Japan and 31.5 percent in Singapore. On the surface, it might look good that more older adults in Taiwan can retire, but in reality, it reflects policies that make it difficult for elderly people to participate in the labor market. Most workplaces lack age-friendly environments, and few offer retraining programs or flexible job arrangements for employees older than 55. As
RSS