The Legislative Yuan on Tuesday passed the third reading of amendments to the Pay Act of the Armed Forces (軍人待遇條例), raising the monthly allowance for voluntary military service members to NT$30,000 from the current NT$15,000. These adjustments are to take effect on Jan. 1 next year.
When I graduated from the military academy and was promoted to second lieutenant, my monthly salary — including base pay, professional allowance and volunteer service allowance — was NT$42,000. At that time, I served as a platoon leader of a combat unit, and was required to stay on base 24 hours a day save for holidays. My hourly pay amounted to just NT$50.
However, several salary adjustments have been implemented in the years since, increasing the base pay and professional allowance. Most notably, President William Lai (賴清德) in April significantly increased military allowances, bringing the total monthly salary of a young second lieutenant to more than NT$58,000.
Now that the Legislative Yuan has passed another allowance increase of NT$15,000, a second lieutenant’s salary could exceed NT$73,000. By implementing such significant salary increases, are they implying that military personnel should get no days off, remaining on standby 24 hours a day, seven days a week?
In the past, being on duty 24 hours per day made it extremely difficult for military personnel to care for their families. Sometimes, soldiers were even unable to attend the funerals of close friends or relatives due to combat-readiness missions, which led many of us to feel it might be better to resign altogether.
Today, with allowance adjustments in response to inflation and Lai’s emphasis on the welfare of soldiers, military personnel enjoy pay and benefits better than those of regular civil servants. We retired veterans cannot help but feel envious — like we were born in the wrong generation.
This substantial increase in the allowance for voluntary military service members would undoubtedly fill the wallets of volunteer soldiers — perhaps these measures would even attract more young people to join the military.
However, higher salaries alone would not be enough to sustain such interest in the long term. If new recruits find that military life does not meet their expectations, they could choose to resign early, thereby wasting all of the investments in their training and professional development.
Furthermore, with soldiers receiving such high monthly salaries, the public would place higher expectations on the military and hold it to much stricter standards. This could make it difficult for military personnel to take leave, much less look after their families.
Additionally, increasing the allowance for voluntary military service would significantly raise personnel costs and squeeze the national defense budget. This could negatively impact the military’s capacity for weapons procurement and logistics maintenance.
As a member of the military, I am delighted to see improvements in the benefits and treatment of our nation’s armed forces. However, salary adjustments should be made over time and in line with inflationary trends and the compensation of civil servants.
Is it fair to expect civil servants and other public-sector employees to accept that military personnel should be given preferential treatment? These circumstances would only serve to worsen division in society.
Chen Hung-hui is a military instructor and university life resources officer.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Eating at a breakfast shop the other day, I turned to an old man sitting at the table next to mine. “Hey, did you hear that the Legislative Yuan passed a bill to give everyone NT$10,000 [US$340]?” I said, pointing to a newspaper headline. The old man cursed, then said: “Yeah, the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] canceled the NT$100 billion subsidy for Taiwan Power Co and announced they would give everyone NT$10,000 instead. “Nice. Now they are saying that if electricity prices go up, we can just use that cash to pay for it,” he said. “I have no time for drivel like
A failure by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respond to Israel’s brilliant 12-day (June 12-23) bombing and special operations war against Iran, topped by US President Donald Trump’s ordering the June 21 bombing of Iranian deep underground nuclear weapons fuel processing sites, has been noted by some as demonstrating a profound lack of resolve, even “impotence,” by China. However, this would be a dangerous underestimation of CCP ambitions and its broader and more profound military response to the Trump Administration — a challenge that includes an acceleration of its strategies to assist nuclear proxy states, and developing a wide array
Young supporters of former Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) were detained for posting the names and photographs of judges and prosecutors believed to be overseeing the Core Pacific City redevelopment corruption case. The supporters should be held responsible for their actions. As for Ko’s successor, TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), he should reflect on whether his own comments are provocative and whether his statements might be misunderstood. Huang needs to apologize to the public and the judiciary. In the article, “Why does sorry seem to be the hardest word?” the late political commentator Nan Fang Shuo (南方朔) wrote
Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) reportedly told the EU’s top diplomat that China does not want Russia to lose in Ukraine, because the US could shift its focus to countering Beijing. Wang made the comment while meeting with EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas on July 2 at the 13th China-EU High-Level Strategic Dialogue in Brussels, the South China Morning Post and CNN reported. Although contrary to China’s claim of neutrality in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, such a frank remark suggests Beijing might prefer a protracted war to keep the US from focusing on
RSS