Many Taiwanese news media have recently reported that geomagnetic storms might be harmful to humans, saying they could affect the nervous, cardiovascular, immune and endocrine systems, as well as quality of sleep. Those who do not understand the health effects of magnetic fields often use the word “might” to mitigate what are otherwise quite extreme claims.
Taipei Veterans General Hospital’s Division of Genetics and Prenatal Diagnosis head Chang Chia-ming (張家銘) on Monday wrote on Facebook that some people are more susceptible to fluctuations in electromagnetic fields, referring to a condition called “electromagnetic hypersensitivity.”
The US Geological Survey defines a magnetic storm as “a period of rapid magnetic field variation.” It is mainly caused by the occasional emission of a strong surge of solar wind from the sun that disturbs the outer part of the Earth’s magnetic field, generates electric currents in the near-Earth space environment and creates magnetic field variations.
However, the Earth’s magnetic field has no direct influence on human health, as humans have already evolved to survive on Earth. While electromagnetic activity could impact electric technology, it does not affect human beings.
AFP Fact Check quoted University College London space and climate physics associate professor Daniel Verscharen as saying that there was no proof that geomagnetic storms directly affect human health.
University of Michigan Department of Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering assistant professor Dan Welling said he and his students found that studies linking space weather with human health to be “of poor quality, with unsupported conclusions.”
The Earth’s magnetic field strength at its surface measures about 500 milligauss (mG), while geomagnetic fluctuations caused by solar wind average at about 140mG.
The US National Academy of Sciences said that nerve and muscle activity in the human body induces electric currents of about 1 milliampere per square meter (mA/m2). If a person were exposed to an electromagnetic field of 1mG, it would induce a current measuring only 0.001mA/m2, so its effect is about 1,000 times smaller than the currents naturally generated within the human body.
The report titled Health Effects of Low Frequency Electric and Magnetic Fields by the Oak Ridge Associated Universities Panel concluded that there was no need to expand the national research effort to investigate the health effects of low-frequency electromagnetic fields, given a lack of evidence that they are harmful to human health.
A US National Academy of Sciences report titled Possible Health Effects of Exposure to Residential Electric and Magnetic Fields said that there is no evidence of adverse impacts on human health from exposure to power-frequency electric and magnetic fields.
Given that, countries such as the US and Canada do not regulate low-frequency electromagnetic fields.
A WHO publication titled Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity said: “Electromagnetic hypersensitivity has no clear diagnostic criteria and there is no scientific basis to link its symptoms to electromagnetic field exposure.”
Electromagnetic hypersensitivity manifests as a variety of symptoms, from heart palpitations to digestive issues, and is considered a nocebo effect, or negative symptoms that occur due to a belief that something would cause harm.
Decades of research has proven that geomagnetic storms pose no major health risks to humans, so the public need not worry.
Lin Ji-shing is a university professor.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance. It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) held a news conference to celebrate his party’s success in surviving Saturday’s mass recall vote, shortly after the final results were confirmed. While the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) would have much preferred a different result, it was not a defeat for the DPP in the same sense that it was a victory for the KMT: Only KMT legislators were facing recalls. That alone should have given Chu cause to reflect, acknowledge any fault, or perhaps even consider apologizing to his party and the nation. However, based on his speech, Chu showed
RSS