Construction of the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County’s Hengchun Township (恆春) started in 1978. It began commercial operations in 1984. Since then, it has experienced several accidents, radiation pollution and fires. It was finally decommissioned on May 17 after the operating license of its No. 2 reactor expired. However, a proposed referendum to be held on Aug. 23 on restarting the reactor is potentially bringing back those risks.
Four reasons are listed for holding the referendum: First, the difficulty of meeting greenhouse gas reduction targets and the inefficiency of new energy sources such as photovoltaic and wind power. Second, the corruption surrounding photovoltaic power projects that have led to high costs of purchasing electricity, resulting in losses. Third, the importance of energy resilience in the event of a blockade of Taiwan by China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA). Fourth, plans to continue operating once the nuclear power plant passes a safety assessment.
However, does passing a safety assessment guarantee that the nuclear power plant would be safe to operate?
Taiwan People’s Party Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), who advocates extending the service life of nuclear power plants, used to be a representative of the anti-nuclear camp during the 2018 referendum on nuclear power. He said at a public hearing that despite the pro-nuclear side’s claim that Taiwan Power Co (Taipower) and the Nuclear Safety Commission (NSC) would play a gatekeeping role, the lightning arrester of the No. 2 reactor at the Guosheng Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s Wanli District (萬里) in 2016 exploded when it was connected for paralleling. It had just completed its overhaul and passed the NSC’s safety inspection. Moreover, in November 2019, soon after its overhaul, the No. 1 reactor of the Ma-anshan plant had to be shut down for maintenance due to a gas leak. Incidents like these show that safety assessments might not necessarily identify all risks.
During the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant in Ukraine was frequently attacked by artillery fire and drones; the Chernobyl Power Plant, which in 1986 suffered the worst nuclear disaster in history, was also attacked by drones and caught fire.
Even China worries about its nuclear power plants becoming the primary target of attack if a war breaks out.
If Taiwan resumes nuclear power, it would obviously increase the risk of exposure to radiation disasters during a potential war.
Although corruption has been seen in photovoltaic power projects, it is not uncommon in nuclear power projects, where equipment often needs to be customized and is expensive. The director of the Guosheng Nuclear Power Plant, Tseng Wen-huang (曾文煌), was in April detained for accepting bribes during a procurement process.
Moreover, the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant was built on the Hengchun active fault — methane once escaped through the site when installing seismometers. For such a high-risk site, it would cost a lot of money to improve its safety — it is expensive enough just to evaluate its safety and update old equipment.
In a public hearing for the 2018 referendum, Huang, who then represented the anti-nuclear camp, said that the cost of nuclear power generation has been overly optimistic due to underestimates of the costs behind decommissioning and nuclear waste treatment over the years.
The risky solution of using nuclear power should not be the only way to reduce greenhouse gases. In 2023, when both of its reactors had not yet been decommissioned, the power generated by the Ma-anshan plant was only 17.8 billion kilowatt-hours, which was lower than the 20.6 billion kilowatt-hours energy-saving goal by 2027 proposed by the Ministry of Economic Affairs.
At the end of last year, the ministry proposed a geothermal target of 3.4 gigawatts by 2030, which is much more than the total installed capacity of 1.9 gigawatts of the Ma-anshan plant.
Rather than risk restarting an old nuclear power plant built in a fault zone, it would be much better to implement deep energy saving and renewable energy.
Tsai Ya-ying is an attorney at the Wild at Heart Legal Defense Association.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In the opening remarks of her meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on Friday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) framed her visit as a historic occasion. In his own remarks, Xi had also emphasized the history of the relationship between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Where they differed was that Cheng’s account, while flawed by its omissions, at least partially corresponded to reality. The meeting was certainly historic, albeit not in the way that Cheng and Xi were signaling, and not from the perspective
RSS