Road signs can take us to places we would never have imagined.
The Ministry of the Interior is researching renaming roads — spelled variously as Zhongzheng (中正) in Taipei and Jhongjheng in other parts of the nation — named after former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石). The difference in spelling itself has an ideological basis.
It is the name that adorns the Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall (中正紀念堂) in Taipei — the monument to the former dictator is spelled Chiang Kai-shek in English, but uses Zhongzheng in Chinese.
According to a study by the Transitional Justice Commission, 316 roads are named Zhongzheng or Jhongjheng; another 28 are named Jieshou (介壽), an abbreviation of the slogan “long live Chiang Kai-shek”; and 11 are named Jingguo (經國) after Chiang’s son and successor Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國).
Chiang Kai-shek chose Zhongzheng, which implies the qualities of uprightness, rectitude and orthodoxy, for himself. The name, glorifying the former dictator, is all around us.
All street names in Taiwan honoring Japanese or the state of Japan were changed in 1945 after the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government assumed control of the former Japanese colony. Just as the Japanese had created names to glorify their colonial rule, so the KMT sought to erase this memory and establish a national narrative of its own.
Criticism about the plan to change the names centers on the projected cost of the endeavor. It is not about money. It is about ideology. Words and names matter. They frame collective memory and consciousness, they shape understanding. The degree to which this affects our cognitive understanding of our world depends on how wide we draw the circle, or how far we step back to observe, from the local to the international.
On this page, Yu Ming (嶼明) writes about the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) “discursive engineering,” the selective creation and use of names and terms to form its preferred narrative, and to change perceptions of history and truth regarding Taiwan.
On the local implications, Yu uses the example of a speech by Zhang Weiwei (張維為), a professor in China about how Taiwanese, and especially the younger generation, could be easily controlled through the targeted use of discursive engineering channeled through social media and short-video apps. Zhang said that this could “pave the way to eventual unification.”
The Taipei Times dealt with concerns over penetration of the Taiwanese consciousness through these apps in an editorial (“Use Chinese apps with care,” May 30, page 8), but the problem goes so much deeper.
The ministry has said that the reason for changing the road names is to emerge from the authoritarian past and to promote Taiwan’s local languages and culture, including those of indigenous communities. It is a way of returning the nation and, to use Yu’s phrase, “the boundaries of sovereign thought,” from the KMT regime to Taiwanese in the modern, democratic era.
Drawing the circle much wider to the international level, look at the words of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) delivered in Moscow on May 7 in a speech entitled “Learning from History to Build Together a Brighter Future” to mark the end of World War II. Even within that context in a short speech, Xi devoted an entire paragraph on the “restoration” of Taiwan, citing the Cairo Declaration, the Potsdam Proclamation and UN Resolution 2758 as having “affirmed China’s sovereignty” over “the Taiwan island” and how they “legitimize” its “inevitable reunification.”
Multiple levels of vigilance against attempts to shape the narrative and collective thought are required. It starts in our own backyard, and with an awareness of the importance of names.
On March 22, 2023, at the close of their meeting in Moscow, media microphones were allowed to record Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) telling Russia’s dictator Vladimir Putin, “Right now there are changes — the likes of which we haven’t seen for 100 years — and we are the ones driving these changes together.” Widely read as Xi’s oath to create a China-Russia-dominated world order, it can be considered a high point for the China-Russia-Iran-North Korea (CRINK) informal alliance, which also included the dictatorships of Venezuela and Cuba. China enables and assists Russia’s war against Ukraine and North Korea’s
After thousands of Taiwanese fans poured into the Tokyo Dome to cheer for Taiwan’s national team in the World Baseball Classic’s (WBC) Pool C games, an image of food and drink waste left at the stadium said to have been left by Taiwanese fans began spreading on social media. The image sparked wide debate, only later to be revealed as an artificially generated image. The image caption claimed that “Taiwanese left trash everywhere after watching the game in Tokyo Dome,” and said that one of the “three bad habits” of Taiwanese is littering. However, a reporter from a Japanese media outlet
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
RSS