In the late 19th century, Taiwan’s eastern region witnessed a series of violent clashes: In Tuku in 1876, the Dagangkou Incident of 1877 and the 1878 Karewan Incident. The events were triggered by the Qing Dynasty’s efforts to build roads and administrative outposts in indigenous territories. What they saw as development, local indigenous peoples experienced as invasion — an erasure of ancestral lands and sacred landscapes.
A similar dynamic unfolded in the north when Liu Ming-chuan (劉銘傳), Taiwan’s first inspector-general during the Qing Dynasty, started building Taiwan’s first railway in 1887, and continued into the 20th century with the construction of highways and industrial zones. Time and again, development plans designed without cultural understanding have been met with local resistance.
Today, the battleground has expanded beyond indigenous rights. Movements to stop the Miramar Resort in Taitung County, dam projects and cement mining, and efforts to protect coral reefs all reflect a growing distrust in top-down development that ignores environmental justice and collective memory. The activities are not anti-progress protests, but calls for genuine participation and respect.
To avoid repeating the cycles of conflict, begin with three fundamental shifts:
First, recognize historical trauma. Resistance often stems not from an aversion to change, but from deep wounds left by past displacements and violence. If policymakers cannot see the scars, they will mistake caution for obstruction.
Second, respect indigenous worldviews. To outsiders, land is a resource, but to indigenous communities, it is a sacred trust — the foundation of identity and survival. It is not a matter of differing opinions; it is a clash of cosmologies. Without mutual understanding, there can be no meaningful dialogue.
Third, implement genuine participatory mechanisms. Consultation must go beyond procedural hearings. Free, prior and informed consent must be more than a checkbox — it must grant agency to local communities, including the right to say no.
Roads can connect places, but they cannot bridge trust. Construction can reshape terrain, but it cannot repair fractured relationships. Taiwan’s future development must not repeat the colonizing patterns of the past. Only through dialogue, respect and shared decisionmaking can we build a land that honors all who call it home.
Tu Hsin-fu is an indigenous affairs advocate.
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS