At last year’s Shangri-La Dialogue security forum in Singapore, held a week after the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) “Joint Sword-2024A” military exercises to “punish” Taiwan’s newly inaugurated president, Chinese Minister of National Defense Dong Jun (董軍) attempted to persuade the audience that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the PLA stood for peace and dialogue. He managed to do it with a straight face.
Then-US secretary of defense Lloyd Austin referenced “bullying or coercion” by certain regional players, but he did not mention China by name. Neither did Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr when he spoke of the South China Sea maritime disputes. They were trying to reduce regional tensions, not exacerbate them. Yet the maritime disputes continue, as does the PLA’s military intimidation in the Taiwan Strait and around the first island chain.
In an editorial about last year’s forum (“China’s Shangri-La diatribe,” June 6, 2024, page 8), the Taipei Times said it was time that China was called out more explicitly for its behavior. Speaking on Saturday at this year’s forum, US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth did just that.
Dong was absent, so he would not have heard in person Hegseth call China out for its “gray zone” activities in the region, or how every day the PLA harasses Taiwan. He would not have heard Hegseth say how the US is “reorienting toward deterring aggression by communist China,” how it is closely monitoring China’s destabilizing actions or how “any unilateral attempt to change the status quo in the South China Sea and the first island chain by force or coercion is unacceptable.” He would not have heard Hegseth say that US President Donald Trump has determined that “communist China will not invade Taiwan on his watch.”
Dong last year called for the US to withdraw from the Indo-Pacific region. On Saturday, Hegseth went to great lengths to establish the US as an Indo-Pacific nation. He noted Dong’s absence from the forum this year, saying that “as a matter of fact, we are here this morning, and somebody else isn’t.” The comment was not a cheap shot, it was used to contrast his presence with Dong’s no-show, and that, as an Indo-Pacific nation, the US is committed to maintaining a presence in the region, an obvious reference to Dong’s comments about the US leaving the region to China and ASEAN.
Far from painting a copacetic picture of complacency, Hegseth was outlining the practical costs of preparation as a bulwark against the unthinkable human costs of potential conflict in the Indo-Pacific region. He was building a theme of the need to work together with regional allies to ensure a stable, prosperous and peaceful world. He was also crystal clear about who the neighborhood bully was and of the evidence of its malevolent intent.
Pushing back against accusations of US abandonment of allies in Europe, Hegseth reframed the widely shared perception of abandonment as “tough love, but love nonetheless.” That was a necessary, if rather unconvincing, device to lead into his theme of bolstering cooperation with allies in the region. To push back against concerns over US isolationism, he qualified “the Indo-Pacific” with the phrase “our priority theater,” not once, but twice.
Insisting that Trump and the US have “an immense respect for the Chinese people and their civilization,” his use of the adjective “communist” was telling. Taiwanese, too, should be aware of the importance of distinguishing between Chinese and Chinese civilization, on one side of the equation, and the CCP on the other, especially today, the anniversary of the Tiananmen Square Massacre of June 4, 1989.
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
US President Donald Trump’s alleged request that Taiwanese President William Lai (賴清德) not stop in New York while traveling to three of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, after his administration also rescheduled a visit to Washington by the minister of national defense, sets an unwise precedent and risks locking the US into a trajectory of either direct conflict with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) or capitulation to it over Taiwan. Taiwanese authorities have said that no plans to request a stopover in the US had been submitted to Washington, but Trump shared a direct call with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平)
Heavy rains over the past week have overwhelmed southern and central Taiwan, with flooding, landslides, road closures, damage to property and the evacuations of thousands of people. Schools and offices were closed in some areas due to the deluge throughout the week. The heavy downpours brought by the southwest monsoon are a second blow to a region still recovering from last month’s Typhoon Danas. Strong winds and significant rain from the storm inflicted more than NT$2.6 billion (US$86.6 million) in agricultural losses, and damaged more than 23,000 roofs and a record high of nearly 2,500 utility poles, causing power outages. As
The greatest pressure Taiwan has faced in negotiations stems from its continuously growing trade surplus with the US. Taiwan’s trade surplus with the US reached an unprecedented high last year, surging by 54.6 percent from the previous year and placing it among the top six countries with which the US has a trade deficit. The figures became Washington’s primary reason for adopting its firm stance and demanding substantial concessions from Taipei, which put Taiwan at somewhat of a disadvantage at the negotiating table. Taiwan’s most crucial bargaining chip is undoubtedly its key position in the global semiconductor supply chain, which led
RSS