According to article 2 of the treaty of the EU, the bloc is founded on respect for human dignity in societies where “pluralism, non-discrimination [and] tolerance prevail.”
Try telling that to the organizers of next month’s Budapest Pride march.
Following new laws introduced by Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban’s Fidesz government, Hungary has become the first EU country to legislate to enable the banning of a Pride event. An amendment to the country’s constitution now allows public LGBTQ+ events to be designated a threat to children, expanding the scope of earlier laws targeted at schools. As a result, organizers and participants in Budapest’s Pride celebration on June 28 risk being fined and harassed if they turn up to the parade.
Unsurprisingly, and accurately, Orban’s ban has been described as a “full-frontal attack” on LGBTQ+ people. It is also a typically Machiavellian maneuver by the prime minister, intended to provoke a backlash from liberals at home and abroad. As Fidesz trails in the polls ahead of elections next year, Orban is turning to his polarizing playbook once again.
That Orban might be hoping for a reaction does not mean there should not be one. The banning of a Pride parade in a European capital would be in flagrant contravention of EU law regarding freedom of assembly and freedom of expression. A delegation of EU lawmakers who visited Hungary last month reported that the new law had already created a “very hostile atmosphere” for LGBTQ+ Hungarians and led to a rise in violent attacks.
In Brussels, demands for a showdown with Orban were already growing, partly as a result of his pro-Russian President Vladimir Putin obstructionism throughout the war in Ukraine. Hungary is currently denied access to 18 billion euros in EU funds, due to rule-of-law concerns relating to issues such as the treatment of asylum seekers and corruption. However, its rogue prime minister has largely led the European Commission a merry dance and shown contempt for its strictures. This week 20 member states, including France and Germany, published a declaration demanding that all possible sanctions should be deployed if the new anti-LGBTQ+ legislation is not withdrawn.
Unanimity rules mean they would be unlikely to include the suspension of Hungary’s rights as a voting member of the European Council — a move that would be vetoed by Slovakia’s national populist government. However, at the very minimum, the council should move swiftly to identify Orban’s government as clearly in breach of EU values and act to substantially close off its access to Brussels’ funds.
The first Budapest Pride parade took place in 1997. Writing in the Guardian last month, a Hungarian opposition legislator described the event as “the largest recurring demonstration of human rights in Hungary.” According to polls, 78 percent of the city’s residents wish it to go ahead as normal. At a time when the EU’s liberal norms are being challenged by the rise of authoritarianism and intolerance in the West and beyond, its leaders must respond robustly to Orban’s latest shameless attempt to undermine them for his own political ends.
The image was oddly quiet. No speeches, no flags, no dramatic announcements — just a Chinese cargo ship cutting through arctic ice and arriving in Britain in October. The Istanbul Bridge completed a journey that once existed only in theory, shaving weeks off traditional shipping routes. On paper, it was a story about efficiency. In strategic terms, it was about timing. Much like politics, arriving early matters. Especially when the route, the rules and the traffic are still undefined. For years, global politics has trained us to watch the loud moments: warships in the Taiwan Strait, sanctions announced at news conferences, leaders trading
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
The saga of Sarah Dzafce, the disgraced former Miss Finland, is far more significant than a mere beauty pageant controversy. It serves as a potent and painful contemporary lesson in global cultural ethics and the absolute necessity of racial respect. Her public career was instantly pulverized not by a lapse in judgement, but by a deliberate act of racial hostility, the flames of which swiftly encircled the globe. The offensive action was simple, yet profoundly provocative: a 15-second video in which Dzafce performed the infamous “slanted eyes” gesture — a crude, historically loaded caricature of East Asian features used in Western
The Executive Yuan and the Presidential Office on Monday announced that they would not countersign or promulgate the amendments to the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法) passed by the Legislative Yuan — a first in the nation’s history and the ultimate measure the central government could take to counter what it called an unconstitutional legislation. Since taking office last year, the legislature — dominated by the opposition alliance of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party — has passed or proposed a slew of legislation that has stirred controversy and debate, such as extending
RSS