According to article 2 of the treaty of the EU, the bloc is founded on respect for human dignity in societies where “pluralism, non-discrimination [and] tolerance prevail.”
Try telling that to the organizers of next month’s Budapest Pride march.
Following new laws introduced by Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban’s Fidesz government, Hungary has become the first EU country to legislate to enable the banning of a Pride event. An amendment to the country’s constitution now allows public LGBTQ+ events to be designated a threat to children, expanding the scope of earlier laws targeted at schools. As a result, organizers and participants in Budapest’s Pride celebration on June 28 risk being fined and harassed if they turn up to the parade.
Unsurprisingly, and accurately, Orban’s ban has been described as a “full-frontal attack” on LGBTQ+ people. It is also a typically Machiavellian maneuver by the prime minister, intended to provoke a backlash from liberals at home and abroad. As Fidesz trails in the polls ahead of elections next year, Orban is turning to his polarizing playbook once again.
That Orban might be hoping for a reaction does not mean there should not be one. The banning of a Pride parade in a European capital would be in flagrant contravention of EU law regarding freedom of assembly and freedom of expression. A delegation of EU lawmakers who visited Hungary last month reported that the new law had already created a “very hostile atmosphere” for LGBTQ+ Hungarians and led to a rise in violent attacks.
In Brussels, demands for a showdown with Orban were already growing, partly as a result of his pro-Russian President Vladimir Putin obstructionism throughout the war in Ukraine. Hungary is currently denied access to 18 billion euros in EU funds, due to rule-of-law concerns relating to issues such as the treatment of asylum seekers and corruption. However, its rogue prime minister has largely led the European Commission a merry dance and shown contempt for its strictures. This week 20 member states, including France and Germany, published a declaration demanding that all possible sanctions should be deployed if the new anti-LGBTQ+ legislation is not withdrawn.
Unanimity rules mean they would be unlikely to include the suspension of Hungary’s rights as a voting member of the European Council — a move that would be vetoed by Slovakia’s national populist government. However, at the very minimum, the council should move swiftly to identify Orban’s government as clearly in breach of EU values and act to substantially close off its access to Brussels’ funds.
The first Budapest Pride parade took place in 1997. Writing in the Guardian last month, a Hungarian opposition legislator described the event as “the largest recurring demonstration of human rights in Hungary.” According to polls, 78 percent of the city’s residents wish it to go ahead as normal. At a time when the EU’s liberal norms are being challenged by the rise of authoritarianism and intolerance in the West and beyond, its leaders must respond robustly to Orban’s latest shameless attempt to undermine them for his own political ends.
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
China’s supreme objective in a war across the Taiwan Strait is to incorporate Taiwan as a province of the People’s Republic. It follows, therefore, that international recognition of Taiwan’s de jure independence is a consummation that China’s leaders devoutly wish to avoid. By the same token, an American strategy to deny China that objective would complicate Beijing’s calculus and deter large-scale hostilities. For decades, China has cautioned “independence means war.” The opposite is also true: “war means independence.” A comprehensive strategy of denial would guarantee an outcome of de jure independence for Taiwan in the event of Chinese invasion or
A recent Taipei Times editorial (“A targeted bilingual policy,” March 12, page 8) questioned how the Ministry of Education can justify spending NT$151 million (US$4.74 million) when the spotlighted achievements are English speech competitions and campus tours. It is a fair question, but it focuses on the wrong issue. The problem is not last year’s outcomes failing to meet the bilingual education vision; the issue is that the ministry has abandoned the program that originally justified such a large expenditure. In the early years of Bilingual 2030, the ministry’s K-12 Administration promoted the Bilingual Instruction in Select Domains Program (部分領域課程雙語教學實施計畫).
Former Fijian prime minister Mahendra Chaudhry spoke at the Yushan Forum in Taipei on Monday, saying that while global conflicts were causing economic strife in the world, Taiwan’s New Southbound Policy (NSP) serves as a stabilizing force in the Indo-Pacific region and offers strategic opportunities for small island nations such as Fiji, as well as support in the fields of public health, education, renewable energy and agricultural technology. Taiwan does not have official diplomatic relations with Fiji, but it is one of the small island nations covered by the NSP. Chaudhry said that Fiji, as a sovereign nation, should support
RSS