The killing of two staff of the Israeli embassy in Washington comes as the war in Gaza has splintered the US body politic alongside the ongoing rise in political violence.
The suspect, identified as Elias Rodriguez, shot the two people, Yaron Lischinsky and Sarah Milgrim, outside the Capital Jewish Museum on Wednesday last week after they left an event hosted by the American Jewish Committee. Rodriguez reportedly chanted “free, free Palestine” while being detained by security.
This is the latest act of violence in a string of incidents that have affected Jewish, Arab and Muslim communities in the US. On Oct. 14, 2023, a man in Illinois attacked a six-year-old and his mother, both Palestinian American, killing the boy soon after Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack on Israel. The following month, three Palestinian students were shot in Vermont. Reports of anti-Semitism, Islamophobia and anti-Palestinian racism have soared since the war began.
Illustration: Mountain People
However, an uptick in violence is not uniquely associated with the war in Gaza. It is a feature of this “era of violent populism,” said Robert Pape, director of the University of Chicago Project on Security and Threats. Between assassination attempts on then-US presidential candidate Donald Trump, ongoing threats of violence against a wide swath of government officials, including judges, and an arson attack against the Pennsylvania governor, the embassy shooting was not one that happened in isolation.
“This is a chronic illness in our country,” Pape said. “This is not a set of isolated events.”
People who commit acts of political violence often believe they will be celebrated by some portion of the public that supports the same goals, he said. The alleged killer’s supposed manifesto nods at this.
“They think about how they want to be perceived and what they want the news to be saying about them afterwards,” Johns Hopkins University political science professor Liliana Mason said. “And it’s a very kind of self-oriented set of motivations.”
“We know that this guy screamed ‘free Palestine.’ He probably thought that he was doing something political, but also, there are plenty of people who think we should free Palestine, who are not going to go murder a couple people,” Mason said.
A small portion of the pro-Palestinian movement has formally embraced the language of armed resistance, but the vast majority of those protesting against the war have been nonviolent.
Since the shooting, condemnations have come from all sides of the political spectrum, including from politicians who have opposed US involvement in the war and joined pro-Palestinian protests. It also sparked a debate over the distinction between anti-Semitism and anti-Israel political violence, in part because it remains unclear what the perpetrator knew about his victims.
“My heart breaks for the loved ones of the victims of last night’s attack in DC,” said US Representative Rashida Tlaib, who is Palestinian American. “Nobody deserves such terrible violence. Everyone in our communities deserves to live in safety and in peace.”
Trump offered condolences to the loved ones of the couple killed in the attack.
“These horrible DC killings, based obviously on antisemitism, must end, NOW!” he wrote on Truth Social. “Hatred and Radicalism have no place in the USA.”
Jews in the US have said it is another example of the menace they are facing as people protest against the war. Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro, a Democrat whose residence was the target of an anti-Semitic arson earlier this year, said he was “heartbroken and horrified” by the attack.
“May their memories be a blessing and a call to action for each of us,” he wrote on social media.
A writer in the conservative Jewish publication Commentary wrote that Jewish institutions would quickly work to increase security and that “Jews will be arming ourselves.”
Pape’s surveys have tracked a growing acceptance of using violence to achieve political goals across the political spectrum.
A poll he conducted in partnership with the Anti-Defamation League in spring 2023, before the Gaza war began, found that Americans who are highly anti-Semitic were three times more likely to support violence to achieve political aims than the general population. (The Anti-Defamation League is known for tracking anti-Semitism, but its methods have come under scrutiny for conflating anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism.)
However, the killings also show that the US is a “tinderbox” and that political violence is a slippery slope, Pape said. People tend to compartmentalize political violence — if there is an act of violence against Jews, it is only a Jewish issue, the thinking goes, he said. However, violence tends to beget more violence, and more acceptance of violence.
His surveys last year found increasing support for violence against Trump alongside support for violence in favor of Trump, stemming in part from a belief that the electoral and political systems would not address their grievances.
“The more political violence there is against Trump, the more there will be political violence against Democratic leaders like Josh Shapiro,” Pape said. “The more there’s political violence against Josh Shapiro, the more there will be anti-Semitic political violence. These are not compartmentalized issues.”
Meanwhile, it is not only those in the Jewish and Palestinian communities who are being affected, but also those who have taken part in demonstrations associated with the war in Gaza.
Police have used force against protesters on and off campuses, seeking to quash the mass movements that have sprung up around the globe. Thousands of students have been arrested, suspended, kicked out of colleges, lost financial aid, had their degrees withheld. Others who were in the US on visas have seen their immigration threatened and face deportation.
The killings in Washington will probably lead to further crackdowns by the Trump administration on the pro-Palestinian cause. Pape’s most recent survey, earlier this month, showed 39 percent of Democrats agreed that using force was justified to remove Trump from office and that only 44 percent of Republicans opposed Trump using the US military to stop protests.
“We can sleepwalk into martial law pretty easily,” Pape said.
Rachel Leingang, based in Minneapolis, Minnesota, is a democracy reporter focused on misinformation for Guardian US.
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big
RSS