The most telling moment of US President Donald Trump’s meeting with South African President Cyril Ramaphosa was not the cynical screening of footage promoting false claims of “white genocide” in South Africa. It was when a reporter asked Trump what he wanted his counterpart to do about it and he replied: “I don’t know.”
Leaders enter the Oval Office uneasily, especially since the kicking administered to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy. The South African president came armed with gratitude, two golf stars, a billionaire and compliments on the decor — and kept a cool head and a straight face as he was ambushed. Ramaphosa later described it as “robust engagement.” However, in truth, it was a clash of two worlds rather than an interaction.
On one side sat a political heavyweight who calmly asserted the facts; on the other, Trump, espousing wild and inflammatory myths. One side wanted to do bilateral business; the other to pander to the grievances of his domestic base, many of whom doubtless relished the public scolding of an anti-apartheid veteran. No solution was proffered to the imaginary problem.
FALSE NARRATIVE
The ruling African National Congress (ANC) has fallen far short in too many regards. Violent crime is rife. However, the administration’s accusations invert reality. White South Africans are 7 percent of the population, but still own 72 percent of the land.
Experts said that it is poor black people, not wealthier whites, who are disproportionately likely to be victims of violence.
Yet as academic Nicky Falkof has written, white South Africans have become a “cautionary tale for the White far right [internationally] ... central to the landscape and language of White supremacy.” Look where diversity, equity and inclusion gets you.
Trump aired complaints about the “large-scale killing” of white farmers in his first term, amplifying conspiracy theories that originated in far-right forums. Since then, he has grown closer to the South African-born Elon Musk, who said politicians there were “promoting white genocide.”
The US has now cut aid to South Africa, accusing the government of “unjust racial discrimination” and attacking its genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice. Washington has expelled the South African ambassador and given white Afrikaners asylum even as it turns away those fleeing wars.
IRONIC RESULT
Trump’s divisive conspiracy theories and failed attempt to humiliate Ramaphosa appear, ironically, to be fostering unity on foreign affairs within South African politics, where the ANC and its (white-led) coalition partner, the Democratic Alliance, have had very different histories and priorities.
The US still accounts for one-tenth of the country’s trade. South Africa must shore up its auto sector and agriculture, given its sky-high unemployment rate. However, like other governments, Pretoria is salvaging what it can in US relations now, while looking ahead to diversifying its ties. Few expect Washington to renew duty-free trade arrangements for African states this autumn.
Warming relations with other Western countries is one option. However, increasing closeness to China, already South Africa’s top trading partner, looks like an inevitability. Members of the BRICS grouping see an opportunity to bolster ties, although South Africa is discovering that expansion does not always mean greater influence for its dominant players.
Trump is looking for kudos, free planes and red meat to throw to his base. Washington’s partners are increasingly looking elsewhere. It is in US interests to show them respect and nurture longstanding relationships.
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) last week announced that the KMT was launching “Operation Patriot” in response to an unprecedented massive campaign to recall 31 KMT legislators. However, his action has also raised questions and doubts: Are these so-called “patriots” pledging allegiance to the country or to the party? While all KMT-proposed campaigns to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers have failed, and a growing number of local KMT chapter personnel have been indicted for allegedly forging petition signatures, media reports said that at least 26 recall motions against KMT legislators have passed the second signature threshold
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
The Central Election Commission (CEC) on Friday announced that recall motions targeting 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安) have been approved, and that a recall vote would take place on July 26. Of the recall motions against 35 KMT legislators, 31 were reviewed by the CEC after they exceeded the second-phase signature thresholds. Twenty-four were approved, five were asked to submit additional signatures to make up for invalid ones and two are still being reviewed. The mass recall vote targeting so many lawmakers at once is unprecedented in Taiwan’s political history. If the KMT loses more
RSS