The most telling moment of US President Donald Trump’s meeting with South African President Cyril Ramaphosa was not the cynical screening of footage promoting false claims of “white genocide” in South Africa. It was when a reporter asked Trump what he wanted his counterpart to do about it and he replied: “I don’t know.”
Leaders enter the Oval Office uneasily, especially since the kicking administered to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy. The South African president came armed with gratitude, two golf stars, a billionaire and compliments on the decor — and kept a cool head and a straight face as he was ambushed. Ramaphosa later described it as “robust engagement.” However, in truth, it was a clash of two worlds rather than an interaction.
On one side sat a political heavyweight who calmly asserted the facts; on the other, Trump, espousing wild and inflammatory myths. One side wanted to do bilateral business; the other to pander to the grievances of his domestic base, many of whom doubtless relished the public scolding of an anti-apartheid veteran. No solution was proffered to the imaginary problem.
FALSE NARRATIVE
The ruling African National Congress (ANC) has fallen far short in too many regards. Violent crime is rife. However, the administration’s accusations invert reality. White South Africans are 7 percent of the population, but still own 72 percent of the land.
Experts said that it is poor black people, not wealthier whites, who are disproportionately likely to be victims of violence.
Yet as academic Nicky Falkof has written, white South Africans have become a “cautionary tale for the White far right [internationally] ... central to the landscape and language of White supremacy.” Look where diversity, equity and inclusion gets you.
Trump aired complaints about the “large-scale killing” of white farmers in his first term, amplifying conspiracy theories that originated in far-right forums. Since then, he has grown closer to the South African-born Elon Musk, who said politicians there were “promoting white genocide.”
The US has now cut aid to South Africa, accusing the government of “unjust racial discrimination” and attacking its genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice. Washington has expelled the South African ambassador and given white Afrikaners asylum even as it turns away those fleeing wars.
IRONIC RESULT
Trump’s divisive conspiracy theories and failed attempt to humiliate Ramaphosa appear, ironically, to be fostering unity on foreign affairs within South African politics, where the ANC and its (white-led) coalition partner, the Democratic Alliance, have had very different histories and priorities.
The US still accounts for one-tenth of the country’s trade. South Africa must shore up its auto sector and agriculture, given its sky-high unemployment rate. However, like other governments, Pretoria is salvaging what it can in US relations now, while looking ahead to diversifying its ties. Few expect Washington to renew duty-free trade arrangements for African states this autumn.
Warming relations with other Western countries is one option. However, increasing closeness to China, already South Africa’s top trading partner, looks like an inevitability. Members of the BRICS grouping see an opportunity to bolster ties, although South Africa is discovering that expansion does not always mean greater influence for its dominant players.
Trump is looking for kudos, free planes and red meat to throw to his base. Washington’s partners are increasingly looking elsewhere. It is in US interests to show them respect and nurture longstanding relationships.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
RSS