The most telling moment of US President Donald Trump’s meeting with South African President Cyril Ramaphosa was not the cynical screening of footage promoting false claims of “white genocide” in South Africa. It was when a reporter asked Trump what he wanted his counterpart to do about it and he replied: “I don’t know.”
Leaders enter the Oval Office uneasily, especially since the kicking administered to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy. The South African president came armed with gratitude, two golf stars, a billionaire and compliments on the decor — and kept a cool head and a straight face as he was ambushed. Ramaphosa later described it as “robust engagement.” However, in truth, it was a clash of two worlds rather than an interaction.
On one side sat a political heavyweight who calmly asserted the facts; on the other, Trump, espousing wild and inflammatory myths. One side wanted to do bilateral business; the other to pander to the grievances of his domestic base, many of whom doubtless relished the public scolding of an anti-apartheid veteran. No solution was proffered to the imaginary problem.
FALSE NARRATIVE
The ruling African National Congress (ANC) has fallen far short in too many regards. Violent crime is rife. However, the administration’s accusations invert reality. White South Africans are 7 percent of the population, but still own 72 percent of the land.
Experts said that it is poor black people, not wealthier whites, who are disproportionately likely to be victims of violence.
Yet as academic Nicky Falkof has written, white South Africans have become a “cautionary tale for the White far right [internationally] ... central to the landscape and language of White supremacy.” Look where diversity, equity and inclusion gets you.
Trump aired complaints about the “large-scale killing” of white farmers in his first term, amplifying conspiracy theories that originated in far-right forums. Since then, he has grown closer to the South African-born Elon Musk, who said politicians there were “promoting white genocide.”
The US has now cut aid to South Africa, accusing the government of “unjust racial discrimination” and attacking its genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice. Washington has expelled the South African ambassador and given white Afrikaners asylum even as it turns away those fleeing wars.
IRONIC RESULT
Trump’s divisive conspiracy theories and failed attempt to humiliate Ramaphosa appear, ironically, to be fostering unity on foreign affairs within South African politics, where the ANC and its (white-led) coalition partner, the Democratic Alliance, have had very different histories and priorities.
The US still accounts for one-tenth of the country’s trade. South Africa must shore up its auto sector and agriculture, given its sky-high unemployment rate. However, like other governments, Pretoria is salvaging what it can in US relations now, while looking ahead to diversifying its ties. Few expect Washington to renew duty-free trade arrangements for African states this autumn.
Warming relations with other Western countries is one option. However, increasing closeness to China, already South Africa’s top trading partner, looks like an inevitability. Members of the BRICS grouping see an opportunity to bolster ties, although South Africa is discovering that expansion does not always mean greater influence for its dominant players.
Trump is looking for kudos, free planes and red meat to throw to his base. Washington’s partners are increasingly looking elsewhere. It is in US interests to show them respect and nurture longstanding relationships.
Weeks into the craze, nobody quite knows what to make of the OpenClaw mania sweeping China, marked by viral photos of retirees lining up for installation events and users gathering in red claw hats. The queues and cosplay inspired by the “raising a lobster” trend make for irresistible China clickbait. However, the West is fixating on the least important part of the story. As a consumer craze, OpenClaw — the AI agent designed to do tasks on a user’s behalf — would likely burn out. Without some developer background, it is too glitchy and technically awkward for true mainstream adoption,
On Monday, a group of bipartisan US senators arrived in Taiwan to support the nation’s special defense bill to counter Chinese threats. At the same time, Beijing announced that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had invited Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) to visit China, a move to make the KMT a pawn in its proxy warfare against Taiwan and the US. Since her inauguration as KMT chair last year, Cheng, widely seen as a pro-China figure, has made no secret of her desire to interact with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and meet with Xi, naming it a
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) took the stage at a protest rally on Sunday in front of the Presidential Office Building in Taipei in support of former TPP chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), who has been sentenced to 17 years in jail for corruption and embezzlement. Huang told the crowd that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) had sent a message of support the previous day, saying she would be traveling from the south to Taipei: If the protest continued into the evening, she had said, she would show up. The rally was due to end
A delegation of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) officials led by Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is to travel to China tomorrow for a six-day visit to Jiangsu, Shanghai and Beijing, which might end with a meeting between Cheng and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). The trip was announced by Xinhua news agency on Monday last week, which cited China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) Director Song Tao (宋濤) as saying that Cheng has repeatedly expressed willingness to visit China, and that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee and Xi have extended an invitation. Although some people have been speculating about a potential Xi-Cheng