The world’s longest-running armed insurgency has come to an abrupt end. Some four decades after orchestrating its first attack against Turkish government targets, the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) has decided to disband and disarm. The decision marks a turning point not only for Turkey, but for the entire Middle East.
Since its founding in the late 1970s by the now-jailed Abdullah Ocalan, the PKK was motivated primarily by the goal of establishing an independent Kurdish state, while also seeking to secure political rights for the Kurdish minority in Turkey, but several factors, both domestic and international, have apparently convinced its leaders to abandon violence.
Begin with the domestic political situation. Two-term Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has made it clear that he hopes to seek a third mandate, meaning that he has to find a way to amend Turkey’s constitution or to convince parliament to back an early election bill. In either case, success would require him to secure more support than his ruling coalition — his Justice and Development Party and the far-right Nationalist Movement Party — can provide, but Turkey’s third-largest party, the pro-Kurdish Peoples’ Equality and Democracy Party (DEM), can deliver the missing votes. The objective of enrolling the DEM in the parliamentary effort to amend the constitution paved the way for the “Kurdish opening,” designed to enhance the political and cultural rights of Turkey’s Kurds. The quid pro quo was the dismantling of the PKK and an end to its terrorist campaign against the Turkish state.
The PKK’s decision to disband was also influenced by international developments, which had placed the group under severe pressure. Former Syrian president Bashar al-Assad — who had used the PKK as a tool to undermine Turkey — was ousted in December last year and the new Syrian regime could not be counted on to support Kurdish efforts to destabilize Turkey.
The US is also distancing itself from the PKK affiliates that once played a leading role in the fight against the Islamic State group. Whereas former US president Joe Biden’s administration offered near unconditional support to US-allied Kurdish groups, such as the Syrian Democratic Forces, US President Donald Trump believes that US national interests — not least political stability in Syria — are better served by strengthening ties with Turkey.
A final, less-discussed factor shaping the PKK’s calculations was Turkey’s growing use of drone technology to strengthen border security and, more importantly, to target senior PKK commanders outside of Turkey — even deep in Iraqi territory. As this significantly weakened the PKK’s logistical and operational effectiveness, it likely prompted a fundamental reassessment of the insurgency’s prospects.
This combination of factors has created a window of opportunity for Turkey to resolve the Kurdish issue without the kind of violent campaign that fuels radicalization, but a successful transition from an era of armed struggle to one of peace and integration would require Erdogan’s government to deliver on two fronts.
The first is transparency. The PKK’s long history of violence has understandably generated deep animosity within Turkish society. It is therefore essential that the contents of negotiations between the PKK and the Turkish government — including the relevant trade-offs — are communicated clearly and openly. For example, a major consideration would be whether PKK-affiliated entities such as the People’s Protection Units in Syria, would also disarm. The Turkish parliament — and, in particular, the main opposition parties within it — must play a central role in guiding this sensitive process.
The second front is democracy. This historic opening cannot succeed without genuine democratic reform, including credible steps to safeguard judicial independence and enhance freedom of speech and association.
Erdogan’s government could secure quick wins in this area by complying with rulings from the European Court of Human Rights, including its demand to release Kurdish political leader Selahattin Demirtas.
At a time when Ocalan could be released, the Turkish government would also do well to address the conditions faced by other political detainees, such as Istanbul Mayor Ekrem Imamoglu and Umit Ozdag, who leads the ultra-nationalist Victory Party.
The dismantling of the PKK presents a historic opportunity to build a better Turkey. Safeguarding the nation’s newfound freedom from PKK terrorism requires strengthening its democracy more broadly. Beyond helping Turkey, such an initiative would demonstrate to violent actors across the Middle East that the end of political insurgencies can lead to lasting and inclusive peace.
Sinan Ulgen, a former Turkish diplomat, is director of EDAM, an Istanbul-based think tank, and a senior policy fellow at Carnegie Europe.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big
RSS