A series of incidents involving Chinese nationals illegally entering Taiwan took place before Tuesday, the first anniversary of President William Lai (賴清德) assuming office. Those intrusions demonstrated the threat that China’s growing “gray zone” harassment poses to the security of Taiwan.
On Friday last week, two Chinese nationals — a father and a son — on a rubber dinghy were arrested upon landing illegally at a beach in Taoyuan’s Dayuan District (大園). Although the father said they had fled to Taiwan in search of “freedom,” the Coast Guard Administration (CGA) said it would not rule out the intrusion as a “gray zone” tactic to test Taiwan’s response system.
On Sunday, a Chinese influencer uploaded two videos online, saying that he sailed solo from China’s Fujian Province to Taiwan on Friday last week to plant a Chinese flag on a beach in Dayuan District, and then returned to China.
On Tuesday, aside from tens of Chinese military aircraft intruding into Taiwan’s airspace and Chinese fishing boats gathering off the coast of Taiwan’s outlying islands, the CGA also detained two Chinese men on a raft attempting to sneak ashore Kinmen Island.
Ahead of those incidents, the National Security Bureau had warned that China might use military and civilian harassment as part of its “cognitive warfare” to raise alarm in Taiwan around the anniversary of Lai’s inauguration.
To realize its military and geopolitical ambition, China has long utilized civilian ships, including fishing boats, research vessels and ocean ferries, to bolster its naval power. Military experts have also said that Chinese authorities pay and direct civilian vessels to anchor and sail in hotly contested areas, such as the South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait, to enforce Beijing’s territorial claim and to eat away at the sovereignty of its neighbors.
China’s “gray zone” harassment is escalating in tandem with its increasing military activities around Taiwan. Such moves include deploying “no registration, no license, no permit” civilian ships to intrude into Taiwan’s waters to cut undersea cables, harass Taiwanese fishing boats, sneak Chinese nationals into Taiwan and smuggle objects into the nation during Chinese military exercises.
Since January, the CGA has documented five smuggling cases involving 38 people, mostly from China, illegally entering Taiwan. More worrisome, their landing spots are all so-called “red beaches,” the most likely entry points for a Chinese amphibious invasion.
Given that the number of infrared thermal imaging cameras along Taiwan’s coast remains insufficient and garrisons on outlying islands have been downsized due to changes in military deployment because of the nation’s low birthrate, there is an urgent need to boost coastal monitoring equipment and patrol personnel along the nation’s coastlines. The government should also work with industries to adopt advanced technology and equipment, such as upgraded infrared thermal imaging cameras, drones and other electronic devices, to strengthen border surveillance and deterrence.
Under the Immigration Act (入出國及移民法) and the Act Governing Relations between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例), people who enter Taiwan without authorization may be sentenced to up to five years in prison or fined up to NT$500,000. However, offenders have mostly received jail terms of less than eight months or were only fined, then released and returned home.
For example, Chinese men hiding in an international freighter who illegally entered Taiwan and traveled around for two months were only given a 30-day detention that could be converted into a fine. Such light punishment would not prevent repeated intrusions. Harsher penalties for illegal entry should be legislated and implemented to safeguard Taiwan’s security.
In a stark reminder of China’s persistent territorial overreach, Pema Wangjom Thongdok, a woman from Arunachal Pradesh holding an Indian passport, was detained for 18 hours at Shanghai Pudong Airport on Nov. 24 last year. Chinese immigration officials allegedly informed her that her passport was “invalid” because she was “Chinese,” refusing to recognize her Indian citizenship and claiming Arunachal Pradesh as part of South Tibet. Officials had insisted that Thongdok, an Indian-origin UK resident traveling for a conference, was not Indian despite her valid documents. India lodged a strong diplomatic protest, summoning the Chinese charge d’affaires in Delhi and demanding
In the past 72 hours, US Senators Roger Wicker, Dan Sullivan and Ruben Gallego took to social media to publicly rebuke the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) over the defense budget. I understand that Taiwan’s head is on the chopping block, and the urgency of its security situation cannot be overstated. However, the comments from Wicker, Sullivan and Gallego suggest they have fallen victim to a sophisticated disinformation campaign orchestrated by an administration in Taipei that treats national security as a partisan weapon. The narrative fed to our allies claims the opposition is slashing the defense budget to kowtow to the Chinese
Immediately after the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) “Justice Mission” exercise at the end of last year, a question was posed to Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal regarding recent developments involving the exercises around Taiwan, and how he viewed their impact on regional peace and stability. His answer was somewhat perplexing to me as a curious student of Taiwanese affairs. “India closely follows developments across the Indo-Pacific region,” he said, adding: “We have an abiding interest in peace and stability in the region, in view of our significant trade, economic, people-to-people, and maritime interests. We urge all concerned
In a Taipei Times editorial published almost three years ago (“Macron goes off-piste,” April 13, 2023, page 8), French President Emmanuel Macron was criticized for comments he made immediately after meeting Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing. Macron had spoken of the need for his country to find a path on Chinese foreign policy no longer aligned with that of the US, saying that continuing to follow the US agenda would sacrifice the EU’s strategic autonomy. At the time, Macron was criticized for gifting Xi a PR coup, and the editorial said that he had been “persuaded to run
RSS