When compared with Changhua County’s success in addressing the issue of waste management, it appears that the Nantou County Government plans to rely entirely on its project to build an incinerator in Mingjian Township (名間). This approach is one-sided; other viable solutions should be considered.
In response to the controversy over the potential environmental impacts of the incinerator project, the Nantou County Environmental Protection Bureau reportedly stated that all of Taiwan’s seven incinerators are located on farmland, yet there is no concrete evidence of any significant impact on agriculture after 20 years of operation, but can this claim withstand scientific scrutiny?
Furthermore, if there has truly been no impact, where are the data on air, water and soil quality? Was no such testing conducted?
When it comes to potential environmental pollution, the Nantou County Government should respond on the basis of scientific data, put itself in local residents’ shoes and exhibit a genuine effort to address the public’s health concerns.
While incinerators might serve as a short-term solution to the urgent issue of waste disposal, the pollution risks they pose must not be overlooked — the dioxins and heavy metals are produced from their operation and the flying ash created by burning waste might have long-term impacts on both public health and the environment.
In the case of Nantou County — an agriculturul and tourism region renowned for its beautiful mountains and rivers — constructing an incinerator could damage the land, water and air quality. This would inevitably harm the image and reputation of local agricultural products and tourists’ confidence, thereby dealing a significant blow to the local economy. We must remain wary of such risks.
The Nantou County Government should re-evaluate all possible paths for addressing the issue of waste management and disposal. It should look to Changhua County’s practical experience, starting with addressing the issue at its source by reducing overall waste, promoting stricter, yet economically sensible, waste sorting policies, and comprehensively strengthening resource and food waste recycling measures. All of these efforts could serve as a basis for assessing both the scale and appropriate location of any proposed incinerator.
At the same time, in the face of possible controversies surrounding the potential impacts of incinerators, the government must respond on the basis of scientific tests and data, conduct comprehensive and transparent environmental impact assessments, and engage in pragmatic public debate. Such an approach would demonstrate to the local community and the public the local government’s sincerity and expertise — a much better approach than responding to external concerns and criticism with mere assumptions or speculative reasoning.
Through the strict sorting of waste and garbage bag inspections, Changhua County has effectively reduced the volume of waste and enhanced the public’s environmental awareness, thereby offering a low-cost, highly efficient model of avoiding the need for more incinerators and the pollution risks they pose.
Hopefully this approach is enough to encourage the Nantou County Government to brainstorm alternative ideas and creative solutions to waste management, thereby charting the course for a more sustainable future for the county’s residents and the environment.
Siao Hung-jung is an adjunct assistant professor in the Department of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering at Tamkang University. Hu Wen-chi is spokesman for the People First Party.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised eyebrows recently when he declared the era of American unipolarity over. He described America’s unrivaled dominance of the international system as an anomaly that was created by the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. Now, he observed, the United States was returning to a more multipolar world where there are great powers in different parts of the planet. He pointed to China and Russia, as well as “rogue states like Iran and North Korea” as examples of countries the United States must contend with. This all begs the question:
Liberals have wasted no time in pointing to Karol Nawrocki’s lack of qualifications for his new job as president of Poland. He has never previously held political office. He won by the narrowest of margins, with 50.9 percent of the vote. However, Nawrocki possesses the one qualification that many national populists value above all other: a taste for physical strength laced with violence. Nawrocki is a former boxer who still likes to go a few rounds. He is also such an enthusiastic soccer supporter that he reportedly got the logos of his two favorite teams — Chelsea and Lechia Gdansk —
RSS