President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday marked his first full year in office, delivering a speech in the morning just as the Taiwanese Public Opinion Foundation released the results of a survey on his performance.
The poll showed that Lai was regarded as strong on foreign policy, national defense and sovereignty issues, but the chaos in the legislature has left him perceived as doing poorly on domestic matters. Foundation chairman Michael You (游盈隆) said that Lai needs to do more to promote cooperation with Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) lawmakers. Lai scored an average of 57.14, which is considered a “fail,” You said. However, ideological divisions in Taiwan make it challenging for any president to reach the passing grade of 60, he added. Lai’s immediate predecessor, Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), only scored 52.41 in a similar survey after her first year in office, he said.
One could be forgiven for thinking that Lai’s speechwriters had studied the results of the survey, and had taken some of the points to heart, although, in the end, they could not rein themselves in completely. Quiet concessions to legislative cooperation early in the speech were followed by a 460-character barely veiled dig at the legislative chaos the KMT and TPP have wrought over the past year.
If the speech was supposed to be inspiring, Lai let the public down. There is no written rule that presidential addresses have to be dry. Perhaps the 460-character dig, sandwiched between a long section on business and trade — taking up a full third of the speech — and a brief mention of the Computex trade show in Taipei before he wrapped up, was designed as a bit of spice for the audience, or catharsis for the speaker.
Lai did not mention China once in his speech; he kept to Taiwan’s domestic situation and its international and trade relations with partners. After a brief mention of the tragic incident that had occurred the day before outside an elementary school in New Taipei City’s Sansia District (三峽), he turned to what his administration was doing on climate change, the promotion of health and social resilience, and efforts to reach net zero emissions by 2030, improving air quality and increasing health standards.
He said he looked forward to “mutual support” from the ruling and opposition parties. He liked the phrase so much that he said it twice. Talk about the audacity of hope, to borrow a phrase from another president.
The appeals for legislative cooperation and a mention of cross-party delegations to attend the inauguration of US President Donald Trump, “despite the domestic political situation,” notwithstanding, the veiled dig toward the end was replete with phrases that could certainly be read as pushback against the accusations by the KMT that Lai is behaving like a dictator, that the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) somehow represents “green communism,” that the ongoing mass recall movement was organized by the DPP and not grassroots citizens concerned about Taiwan’s democracy, or the demonization of those citizens for standing up and making their voices heard, or that Lai was trying to reinstate martial law.
Lai spoke of democracy being “a display of national strength,” and of how Taiwan “was once the country with the world’s longest martial law period, but now we are a beacon of democracy in Asia.” He spoke of how the younger generation is able to “proactively engage in politics, protect the nation [and] further entrench democracy ... through all manner of constitutional and legal means.”
He finished the dig with the hope that the leaders of all parties can prioritize the nation’s interests and uphold national security, “grounded in shared facts.”
You is right to suggest that Lai try harder to cooperate with the opposition. Unfortunately, it takes two to tango.
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
The stocks of rare earth companies soared on Monday following news that the Trump administration had taken a 10 percent stake in Oklahoma mining and magnet company USA Rare Earth Inc. Such is the visible benefit enjoyed by the growing number of firms that count Uncle Sam as a shareholder. Yet recent events surrounding perhaps what is the most well-known state-picked champion, Intel Corp, exposed a major unseen cost of the federal government’s unprecedented intervention in private business: the distortion of capital markets that have underpinned US growth and innovation since its founding. Prior to Intel’s Jan. 22 call with analysts
RSS