President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday marked his first full year in office, delivering a speech in the morning just as the Taiwanese Public Opinion Foundation released the results of a survey on his performance.
The poll showed that Lai was regarded as strong on foreign policy, national defense and sovereignty issues, but the chaos in the legislature has left him perceived as doing poorly on domestic matters. Foundation chairman Michael You (游盈隆) said that Lai needs to do more to promote cooperation with Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) lawmakers. Lai scored an average of 57.14, which is considered a “fail,” You said. However, ideological divisions in Taiwan make it challenging for any president to reach the passing grade of 60, he added. Lai’s immediate predecessor, Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), only scored 52.41 in a similar survey after her first year in office, he said.
One could be forgiven for thinking that Lai’s speechwriters had studied the results of the survey, and had taken some of the points to heart, although, in the end, they could not rein themselves in completely. Quiet concessions to legislative cooperation early in the speech were followed by a 460-character barely veiled dig at the legislative chaos the KMT and TPP have wrought over the past year.
If the speech was supposed to be inspiring, Lai let the public down. There is no written rule that presidential addresses have to be dry. Perhaps the 460-character dig, sandwiched between a long section on business and trade — taking up a full third of the speech — and a brief mention of the Computex trade show in Taipei before he wrapped up, was designed as a bit of spice for the audience, or catharsis for the speaker.
Lai did not mention China once in his speech; he kept to Taiwan’s domestic situation and its international and trade relations with partners. After a brief mention of the tragic incident that had occurred the day before outside an elementary school in New Taipei City’s Sansia District (三峽), he turned to what his administration was doing on climate change, the promotion of health and social resilience, and efforts to reach net zero emissions by 2030, improving air quality and increasing health standards.
He said he looked forward to “mutual support” from the ruling and opposition parties. He liked the phrase so much that he said it twice. Talk about the audacity of hope, to borrow a phrase from another president.
The appeals for legislative cooperation and a mention of cross-party delegations to attend the inauguration of US President Donald Trump, “despite the domestic political situation,” notwithstanding, the veiled dig toward the end was replete with phrases that could certainly be read as pushback against the accusations by the KMT that Lai is behaving like a dictator, that the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) somehow represents “green communism,” that the ongoing mass recall movement was organized by the DPP and not grassroots citizens concerned about Taiwan’s democracy, or the demonization of those citizens for standing up and making their voices heard, or that Lai was trying to reinstate martial law.
Lai spoke of democracy being “a display of national strength,” and of how Taiwan “was once the country with the world’s longest martial law period, but now we are a beacon of democracy in Asia.” He spoke of how the younger generation is able to “proactively engage in politics, protect the nation [and] further entrench democracy ... through all manner of constitutional and legal means.”
He finished the dig with the hope that the leaders of all parties can prioritize the nation’s interests and uphold national security, “grounded in shared facts.”
You is right to suggest that Lai try harder to cooperate with the opposition. Unfortunately, it takes two to tango.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS