On May 1, The Economist published an article titled “A Superpower Crunch Over Taiwan Is Coming,” examining the growing risk of conflict over Taiwan amid deteriorating US-China relations. The piece says that Taiwan’s importance has increased economically, due to its critical role in global semiconductor manufacturing through Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co, and geopolitically, as China’s expanding military capabilities have begun to erode the US’ regional advantage.
Critics of the publication’s approach often say that it leans too heavily on alarmism, leaving readers with a sense of foreboding, rather than objective clarity. However, to either fully accept or outright dismiss the article would be a mistake, as it raises several important issues that warrant thoughtful consideration.
The first issue is the US’ continued reliance on tariffs as a central tool in its economic competition with China and the long-term viability of the approach. If tensions were to escalate, the US could find itself running low on non-military forms of leverage to shape China’s behavior.
Another is China’s increasing use of “gray zone” tactics, as Beijing continues to invest in covert strategies to weaken Taiwan from within. Disinformation, social media manipulation and astroturfing — the fabrication of seemingly grassroots support — are among the tools used. These tactics aim to erode public trust and weaken democratic institutions below the threshold of open conflict.
Taiwan’s internal political divisions further complicate matters. With the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) controlling the legislature and the Democratic Progressive Party leading the executive, partisan deadlock has hampered consensus on national security. In an era of intensifying pressure, domestic gridlock could be just as dangerous as foreign coercion.
Still, while such warnings serve as valuable reminders, it is important not to succumb to paranoia. Despite its assertive posture, China’s authoritarian system faces significant internal pressures, such as youth unemployment and an economic slowdown. A prolonged downturn could fuel domestic unrest and expose vulnerabilities. History shows that even the most formidable authoritarian systems can collapse under internal strain. For those skeptical of US support — especially among Taiwan’s anti-US voices — the fear that Washington might abandon the nation persists. However, this assumption significantly underestimates Taiwan’s strategic importance. Taiwan is a linchpin in the global semiconductor supply chain. Any disruption to its chip production would send shock waves through the global economy, triggering substantial financial losses worldwide.
Strategically, Taiwan is a linchpin in the “first island chain” — a defensive perimeter that helps the US and its allies contain China’s maritime expansion. If Taiwan were to fall, the integrity of the perimeter would weaken. The US would be pushed out of Asia, diminishing its influence and jeopardizing its role as a global leader. In this context, Taiwan is a pivotal asset in the US’ geopolitical calculus.
Encouragingly, Washington has begun to shift away from its long-standing policy of strategic ambiguity toward a more explicit show of support, as demonstrated by legislation such as the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act and the Taiwan International Solidarity Act. Since the severance of diplomatic ties in 1979, Taiwan has rarely seen such strong and public commitments from Washington.
Rather than living in fear or retreating into skepticism, Taiwan must recognize its strengths and reaffirm its democratic values. It must also confront efforts by China to undermine its sovereignty, doing so through legal and transparent means.
The road ahead is undoubtedly difficult, but it is far from hopeless. With unity at home and solidarity abroad, Taiwan can move forward with resolve and confidence — not resignation.
KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) recent visit to Beijing and her upcoming visit to Washington will serve as a high-level test of her diplomatic mettle. In Beijing, Cheng was received with symbolic gestures, a warm reception, and high-level access. In Washington, she will receive far less pomp and far sharper questions about the KMT’s vision for the future of Taiwan. Her challenge will be to persuade Washington that the KMT’s engagement with China can coexist with strong deterrence. Cheng’s April 7-12 visit to mainland China coincided with an intense period of conflict in Iran. Despite the strategic significance of Cheng’s trip,
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has sent the vast Asian chemicals industry into a tailspin. Deprived of the likes of Qatari natural gas and Saudi Arabian oil, the region’s fertilizer and plastics plants are slowing production or even shutting down. Everywhere except China, that is. In petrochemicals, China is unique. As well as a traditional industry that uses oil and gas as feedstock, it has parallel output that relies on its abundant domestic coal. Unsurprisingly, India and other regional powers want to copy and paste the Chinese method. This would not be easy — or climate friendly. The
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
US President Donald Trump recently repeated his claim that “Taiwan stole America’s chip industry,” reigniting public debate on the issue. As a former Taiwanese minister of economic affairs and an entrepreneur deeply involved in semiconductor supply chain development, I feel a responsibility to clarify this misunderstanding. From the perspective of global industrial evolution and the economic principle of comparative advantage, such a statement appears overly simplistic and risks obscuring the essence of the issue. The rise of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry was not built on “replacing America,” but rather emerged as a result of countries pursuing different development paths within the
RSS