On May 1, The Economist published an article titled “A Superpower Crunch Over Taiwan Is Coming,” examining the growing risk of conflict over Taiwan amid deteriorating US-China relations. The piece says that Taiwan’s importance has increased economically, due to its critical role in global semiconductor manufacturing through Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co, and geopolitically, as China’s expanding military capabilities have begun to erode the US’ regional advantage.
Critics of the publication’s approach often say that it leans too heavily on alarmism, leaving readers with a sense of foreboding, rather than objective clarity. However, to either fully accept or outright dismiss the article would be a mistake, as it raises several important issues that warrant thoughtful consideration.
The first issue is the US’ continued reliance on tariffs as a central tool in its economic competition with China and the long-term viability of the approach. If tensions were to escalate, the US could find itself running low on non-military forms of leverage to shape China’s behavior.
Another is China’s increasing use of “gray zone” tactics, as Beijing continues to invest in covert strategies to weaken Taiwan from within. Disinformation, social media manipulation and astroturfing — the fabrication of seemingly grassroots support — are among the tools used. These tactics aim to erode public trust and weaken democratic institutions below the threshold of open conflict.
Taiwan’s internal political divisions further complicate matters. With the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) controlling the legislature and the Democratic Progressive Party leading the executive, partisan deadlock has hampered consensus on national security. In an era of intensifying pressure, domestic gridlock could be just as dangerous as foreign coercion.
Still, while such warnings serve as valuable reminders, it is important not to succumb to paranoia. Despite its assertive posture, China’s authoritarian system faces significant internal pressures, such as youth unemployment and an economic slowdown. A prolonged downturn could fuel domestic unrest and expose vulnerabilities. History shows that even the most formidable authoritarian systems can collapse under internal strain. For those skeptical of US support — especially among Taiwan’s anti-US voices — the fear that Washington might abandon the nation persists. However, this assumption significantly underestimates Taiwan’s strategic importance. Taiwan is a linchpin in the global semiconductor supply chain. Any disruption to its chip production would send shock waves through the global economy, triggering substantial financial losses worldwide.
Strategically, Taiwan is a linchpin in the “first island chain” — a defensive perimeter that helps the US and its allies contain China’s maritime expansion. If Taiwan were to fall, the integrity of the perimeter would weaken. The US would be pushed out of Asia, diminishing its influence and jeopardizing its role as a global leader. In this context, Taiwan is a pivotal asset in the US’ geopolitical calculus.
Encouragingly, Washington has begun to shift away from its long-standing policy of strategic ambiguity toward a more explicit show of support, as demonstrated by legislation such as the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act and the Taiwan International Solidarity Act. Since the severance of diplomatic ties in 1979, Taiwan has rarely seen such strong and public commitments from Washington.
Rather than living in fear or retreating into skepticism, Taiwan must recognize its strengths and reaffirm its democratic values. It must also confront efforts by China to undermine its sovereignty, doing so through legal and transparent means.
The road ahead is undoubtedly difficult, but it is far from hopeless. With unity at home and solidarity abroad, Taiwan can move forward with resolve and confidence — not resignation.
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
RSS