On May 1, The Economist published an article titled “A Superpower Crunch Over Taiwan Is Coming,” examining the growing risk of conflict over Taiwan amid deteriorating US-China relations. The piece says that Taiwan’s importance has increased economically, due to its critical role in global semiconductor manufacturing through Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co, and geopolitically, as China’s expanding military capabilities have begun to erode the US’ regional advantage.
Critics of the publication’s approach often say that it leans too heavily on alarmism, leaving readers with a sense of foreboding, rather than objective clarity. However, to either fully accept or outright dismiss the article would be a mistake, as it raises several important issues that warrant thoughtful consideration.
The first issue is the US’ continued reliance on tariffs as a central tool in its economic competition with China and the long-term viability of the approach. If tensions were to escalate, the US could find itself running low on non-military forms of leverage to shape China’s behavior.
Another is China’s increasing use of “gray zone” tactics, as Beijing continues to invest in covert strategies to weaken Taiwan from within. Disinformation, social media manipulation and astroturfing — the fabrication of seemingly grassroots support — are among the tools used. These tactics aim to erode public trust and weaken democratic institutions below the threshold of open conflict.
Taiwan’s internal political divisions further complicate matters. With the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) controlling the legislature and the Democratic Progressive Party leading the executive, partisan deadlock has hampered consensus on national security. In an era of intensifying pressure, domestic gridlock could be just as dangerous as foreign coercion.
Still, while such warnings serve as valuable reminders, it is important not to succumb to paranoia. Despite its assertive posture, China’s authoritarian system faces significant internal pressures, such as youth unemployment and an economic slowdown. A prolonged downturn could fuel domestic unrest and expose vulnerabilities. History shows that even the most formidable authoritarian systems can collapse under internal strain. For those skeptical of US support — especially among Taiwan’s anti-US voices — the fear that Washington might abandon the nation persists. However, this assumption significantly underestimates Taiwan’s strategic importance. Taiwan is a linchpin in the global semiconductor supply chain. Any disruption to its chip production would send shock waves through the global economy, triggering substantial financial losses worldwide.
Strategically, Taiwan is a linchpin in the “first island chain” — a defensive perimeter that helps the US and its allies contain China’s maritime expansion. If Taiwan were to fall, the integrity of the perimeter would weaken. The US would be pushed out of Asia, diminishing its influence and jeopardizing its role as a global leader. In this context, Taiwan is a pivotal asset in the US’ geopolitical calculus.
Encouragingly, Washington has begun to shift away from its long-standing policy of strategic ambiguity toward a more explicit show of support, as demonstrated by legislation such as the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act and the Taiwan International Solidarity Act. Since the severance of diplomatic ties in 1979, Taiwan has rarely seen such strong and public commitments from Washington.
Rather than living in fear or retreating into skepticism, Taiwan must recognize its strengths and reaffirm its democratic values. It must also confront efforts by China to undermine its sovereignty, doing so through legal and transparent means.
The road ahead is undoubtedly difficult, but it is far from hopeless. With unity at home and solidarity abroad, Taiwan can move forward with resolve and confidence — not resignation.
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
RSS