A new US-China agreement to pause sky-high tariffs on each other is pressuring manufacturing hubs such as Vietnam and Mexico to make their own, better deals with the US to continue benefiting from a “China-plus-one” strategy by global producers.
In the new world order dictated by US President Donald Trump’s shifting announcements of tariffs, countries measure their success not by the terms of their trade deals with the US, but by how they compare with those of other countries.
For the past five weeks, many nations facing significant duties under Trump’s now-paused “reciprocal” global tariff regime announced on April 2 took solace from having better rates than China, which saw US tariffs on Chinese imports ratchet up from 20 percent to an embargo-like 145 percent from March to this month.
Vietnam was better off than China with a 46 percent rate, while Thailand was at 36 percent and Malaysia at 24 percent.
Given their comparative advantage, manufacturing hubs anticipated further moves by multinational corporations to set up shop in their countries and decrease their dependency on China, potentially adding to a years-long trend known as “China-plus-one.”
Now, everything is up in the air again following a breakthrough in US-China trade talks that resulted in a 90-day reprieve from the astoundingly high tariffs on China, leaving a base 30 percent import tax rate for made-in-China products.
Tariffs on China still remain higher than competing industrial hubs paying 10 percent under Trump’s 90-day pause on the duties, but some experts said the deal could halt some of the momentum pushing multinationals to further shift supply chains outside of China.
“The rules of the game are still uncertain,” said Diego Marroquin Bitar, an expert on North American trade who also works as a consultant.
“I think companies are just going to delay their investments as much as they can,” Bitar said.
Starting in his first term, Trump sought to leverage tariffs on China to force companies to relocate manufacturing to the US.
The “reshoring” to the US largely did not materialize, but over the past decade companies such as Apple did start looking for alternatives to China, with a focus on countries that offered relatively low labour costs and smaller tariffs.
Southeast Asian nations were among the biggest beneficiaries, along with Mexico, but if the US-China tariff pause is extended, those countries could see their comparative advantage dissipate.
Vietnam, Thailand and Malaysia are negotiating their own tariff deals with the US. Mexico, which avoided tariffs, is also seeking to reduce separate import duties on specific products such as cars.
The US-China trade thaw means companies that had considered speeding up efforts to offshore production from China might now tap the brakes, said Wu Xinbo (吳心伯), director of the Center for American Studies at Shanghai’s Fudan University.
“They will maintain their current situation, keep China as their main operations hub and make appropriate partial arrangements in neighboring countries, but the bulk of their business will remain in China,” he said.
Sun Chenghao (孫成昊), a fellow at Tsinghua University’s Center for International Security and Strategy, said the uncertainty of Trump’s policymaking was “very painful for companies” trying to decide whether or how much to decouple from China.
“The current cooldown in tensions does not mean that US firms dare to boldly engage in business activities in China,” he said. “Everyone is still waiting for the possibility that tariffs might be imposed again.”
For countries such as Vietnam, which had also attracted Chinese manufacturers since Trump imposed tariffs in his first administration, the unexpected US rapprochement with Beijing ratchets up pressure to reach their own sweeter deals.
“If Vietnam manages to strike a better deal than China — which is more than likely after today — it would present itself as an attractive alternative to China in regional investment strategies,” said Leif Schneider, head of international law firm Luther in Vietnam.
“This was already the outcome of the first trade war introduced by the first Trump administration,” he added.
Trade tensions and uncertainty have already reduced pledges for new foreign investments in Vietnam, which last month fell to US$2.84 billion, a 30 percent drop from March and a decline of about 8 percent year-on-year.
In Mexico, President Claudia Sheinbaum has repeatedly emphasized the nation’s comparative advantage on US tariffs. Most exports to the US under the US-Mexico-Canada trade deal are tariff free, although Trump has imposed sizeable levies on steel, aluminum, vehicles and auto parts.
Jorge Guajardo, a former Mexican ambassador to China and a consultant on international trade, said even if Monday’s trade deal with China sticks, multinational companies would still be wary of depending solely on Chinese manufacturing — and Mexico stands to benefit.
“If you are Walmart, Target, Home Depot or any other important importer who just went through five weeks of hell, you appreciate the reprieve, but you are looking for a different supply source,” he said.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That