On Wednesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) drew parallels between the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) under President William Lai (賴清德) now and the fascism of Germany under Adolf Hitler. The German Institute Taipei, Berlin’s de facto embassy in Taiwan, expressed on social media its “deep disappointment and concern” over the comments.
“We must state unequivocally: Taiwan today is in no way comparable to the tyranny of National Socialism,” it said, referring to the Nazi Party.
“We are disappointed and concerned to learn about the inappropriate comparison between the atrocities of the Nazi regime and the current political context in Taiwan,” the Israel Economic and Cultural Office in Taipei said.
Chu remained defiant, saying foreign governments should not interfere in the internal affairs of other countries, and insisting that his comparison was legitimate given Lai’s “persecution” of the opposition.
The KMT has drawn increasing criticism after a series of appalling behavior, including a Nazi salute by a KMT Youth League member, inflammatory rhetoric at a rally on April 26 and frequent use of politically charged slurs such as “green Nazis” and “green commies.” Now it has stooped so low as to invoke historical symbols rooted in atrocities. By equating Lai’s leadership with Hitler’s genocide, Chu not only trivializes the profound trauma endured by those Hitler targeted, but also crosses a line of universal values.
In a democratic society, people are free to choose their political affiliations. However, placing faith in a party whose rhetoric is so misleading that other nations feel compelled to condemn it is another matter entirely. This blind partisanship stems from two main factors:
First is the poisoned legacy of former presidents Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國). Under their authoritarian rule, generations of Taiwanese were indoctrinated to revere the KMT and view indigenous cultures as inferior, while casting those in opposition as enemies of the state. The era of state-sponsored political education instilled a deep-seated bias, leading many to develop a lasting animosity toward the DPP.
Second, as Taiwan stands on the front line of China’s cognitive warfare, people are increasingly exposed to its propaganda on social media. Without adequate media literacy or critical thinking, many fall prey to ideological traps, which manipulate public perception by amplifying fears of war with China and portraying the DPP as a “troublemaker” bent on provoking conflict. Fueled by this orchestrated bigotry, people tend to blame the DPP, regardless of evidence, context or nuance.
Chu’s actions were nothing more than a desperate attempt to cling to power and relevance. He was not targeting “deep blue” voters, but sought to sway independents. By resorting to incendiary labels such as “Hitler” and “fascism,” the KMT seeks to weaponize anti-DPP sentiment, using it as a smokescreen to obscure its own policy failures and misconduct — such as forgery in signature-gathering for recall petitions — and as a banner to unite independent voters against the DPP, which is what the KMT desperately needs in face of the opposing recall movement.
However, Taiwanese are neither ignorant nor apathetic when a political party crosses the line. The Sunflower movement, the recall efforts and the 419 rally share a common trait: They were not initiated by politicians, but by ordinary people seeking to raise awareness and rally the public against the looming threat posed by China. These grassroots efforts reflect the deep civic awareness and democratic resilience of Taiwanese.
Taiwanese have long been commended for their kindness and warmth. However, such generosity should not be squandered on politicians who serve only their own interests or those of the CCP. Chu can remain unapologetic, but Taiwan should rally behind the recall petitions targeting KMT legislators and send a clear message to the global community: The KMT does not represent Taiwan.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS