The initial failure of coalition members to back the new German chancellor in sufficient numbers was a bad beginning at a treacherous moment for the nation.
The election of Friedrich Merz as chancellor by German legislators on Tuesday morning was meant to end months of political instability, since the collapse of former German chancellor Olaf Scholz’s government half a year ago — itself the result of bitter infighting at the top. Many fear that this could be the last chance to keep out the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD), but the humiliating result of the first ballot — in which Merz became the first chancellor-designate to fail to secure the majority needed in the Bundestag since World War II — was a bad beginning.
It was supposed to be a straightforward confirmation, instead he was hobbled by rebels from his own coalition. Only 310 of its 328 legislators backed him, short of the 316 required. He was approved by 325 in a hastily scheduled second vote, hours later.
Yet while it was a bombshell, the first vote only laid bare the fundamental problem. The alliance between Merz’s conservatives and the Social Democrats might be known as a grand coalition, but it is in practice a very modest one — and he has no realistic alternatives should it fall apart.
AfD leader Alice Weidel made no attempt to hide her glee at the debacle in the Bundestag, calling for a snap election. Her ethno-nationalist party, now formally declared as extremist by Germany’s domestic intelligence agency, came second in February’s snap election, gaining one in five votes. It has since risen to first place in some polls.
The concern is of a toxic cycle emerging. As support for parties in the center diminishes, they are forced to draw together — strengthening the perception that they form a single blob which mutes any new endeavor addressing the real needs of ordinary voters, and instead horse-trades its way toward unsatisfactory compromises. That in turn could whittle support further, with voters concluding that right-wing political extremism offers the only real prospect for change. No one would suggest this is unique to Germany, but the AfD’s surge makes it especially dangerous, and the nation’s history makes it especially chilling.
A political system built for stability has entered an unpredictable new age. Merz’s domestic struggles are intensified by the storm blowing in across the Atlantic. The administration of US President Donald Trump is openly egging on the AfD and undermining the government. US tariffs threaten a struggling economy. The disintegration of US security guarantees loom over the continent.
That context ensured that Merz’s eventual swearing-in was received with undisguised relief elsewhere in Europe, too. The best-case scenario is that Tuesday’s shock forces a recalibration by both the new chancellor and members of his coalition. Resolving their discontent would require empathy, subtlety and deftness that he has yet to show.
His strident rhetoric, yet political flexibility has often made him look brazen rather than pragmatic. His decision to scrap borrowing restrictions, allowing defense spending to rise, was necessary, but arrived as a screeching U-turn, which angered members of his own Christian Democratic Union.
Relying on AfD votes to push through a resolution on border security was a grave error that broke the post-war taboo against working with the far-right. Few will feel that he is the ideal leader for this perilous moment — as his dismal poll ratings demonstrate — but with so much at stake, Germany cannot afford for its new chancellor to fail.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS