The initial failure of coalition members to back the new German chancellor in sufficient numbers was a bad beginning at a treacherous moment for the nation.
The election of Friedrich Merz as chancellor by German legislators on Tuesday morning was meant to end months of political instability, since the collapse of former German chancellor Olaf Scholz’s government half a year ago — itself the result of bitter infighting at the top. Many fear that this could be the last chance to keep out the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD), but the humiliating result of the first ballot — in which Merz became the first chancellor-designate to fail to secure the majority needed in the Bundestag since World War II — was a bad beginning.
It was supposed to be a straightforward confirmation, instead he was hobbled by rebels from his own coalition. Only 310 of its 328 legislators backed him, short of the 316 required. He was approved by 325 in a hastily scheduled second vote, hours later.
Yet while it was a bombshell, the first vote only laid bare the fundamental problem. The alliance between Merz’s conservatives and the Social Democrats might be known as a grand coalition, but it is in practice a very modest one — and he has no realistic alternatives should it fall apart.
AfD leader Alice Weidel made no attempt to hide her glee at the debacle in the Bundestag, calling for a snap election. Her ethno-nationalist party, now formally declared as extremist by Germany’s domestic intelligence agency, came second in February’s snap election, gaining one in five votes. It has since risen to first place in some polls.
The concern is of a toxic cycle emerging. As support for parties in the center diminishes, they are forced to draw together — strengthening the perception that they form a single blob which mutes any new endeavor addressing the real needs of ordinary voters, and instead horse-trades its way toward unsatisfactory compromises. That in turn could whittle support further, with voters concluding that right-wing political extremism offers the only real prospect for change. No one would suggest this is unique to Germany, but the AfD’s surge makes it especially dangerous, and the nation’s history makes it especially chilling.
A political system built for stability has entered an unpredictable new age. Merz’s domestic struggles are intensified by the storm blowing in across the Atlantic. The administration of US President Donald Trump is openly egging on the AfD and undermining the government. US tariffs threaten a struggling economy. The disintegration of US security guarantees loom over the continent.
That context ensured that Merz’s eventual swearing-in was received with undisguised relief elsewhere in Europe, too. The best-case scenario is that Tuesday’s shock forces a recalibration by both the new chancellor and members of his coalition. Resolving their discontent would require empathy, subtlety and deftness that he has yet to show.
His strident rhetoric, yet political flexibility has often made him look brazen rather than pragmatic. His decision to scrap borrowing restrictions, allowing defense spending to rise, was necessary, but arrived as a screeching U-turn, which angered members of his own Christian Democratic Union.
Relying on AfD votes to push through a resolution on border security was a grave error that broke the post-war taboo against working with the far-right. Few will feel that he is the ideal leader for this perilous moment — as his dismal poll ratings demonstrate — but with so much at stake, Germany cannot afford for its new chancellor to fail.
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her
Before the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) can blockade, invade, and destroy the democracy on Taiwan, the CCP seeks to make the world an accomplice to Taiwan’s subjugation by harassing any government that confers any degree of marginal recognition, or defies the CCP’s “One China Principle” diktat that there is no free nation of Taiwan. For United States President Donald Trump’s upcoming May 14, 2026 visit to China, the CCP’s top wish has nothing to do with Trump’s ongoing dismantling of the CCP’s Axis of Evil. The CCP’s first demand is for Trump to cease US