When a recall campaign targeting the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators was launched, something rather disturbing happened.
According to reports, Hualien County Government officials visited several people to verify their signatures. Local authorities allegedly used routine or harmless reasons as an excuse to enter people’s house for investigation.
The KMT launched its own recall campaigns, targeting Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers, and began to collect signatures. It has been found that some of the KMT-headed counties and cities have allegedly been mobilizing municipal machinery.
In Keelung, the director of the Department of Civil Affairs used the household registration system to obtain people’s personal information, which entails recall petition forgery. The KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have been saying that the central government is mobilizing state machinery to carry out political persecution. However, as the judicial investigation proceeds, officials of the KMT’s local chapters have been caught red-handed, and have been detained as part of the ongoing investigation into their alleged crimes.
It seems that the civil affairs director was playing with the law, failing to make a clear distinction between party and government while infringing on personal privacy and forging recall documents. Such acts are proof of the lengths the KMT is willing to go to to achieve its goals.
Indigenous DPP Legislator Saidhai Tahovecahe has also recently been made aware that his parents, who had passed away years ago, were on the KMT’s list of signatures.
In the past, the KMT controlled the state machinery, oppressed freedom of speech and contravened human rights during the White Terror era. Although the party has lost power, it still heads most of the local governments in Taiwan. Today, it has been revealed that KMT officials mobilized municipal machinery to carry out terrible political persecution.
If Taiwan wants to enjoy true freedom and democracy, apart from carrying out recall campaigns against KMT lawmakers, it is also necessary to convince Taiwanese to change the local political map, so the public can rid itself of the shadow of the White Terror era once and for all.
Chen Chi-nung is principal of Shuili Junior-High School in Nantou County.
Translated by Eddy Chang
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic