When a recall campaign targeting the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators was launched, something rather disturbing happened.
According to reports, Hualien County Government officials visited several people to verify their signatures. Local authorities allegedly used routine or harmless reasons as an excuse to enter people’s house for investigation.
The KMT launched its own recall campaigns, targeting Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers, and began to collect signatures. It has been found that some of the KMT-headed counties and cities have allegedly been mobilizing municipal machinery.
In Keelung, the director of the Department of Civil Affairs used the household registration system to obtain people’s personal information, which entails recall petition forgery. The KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have been saying that the central government is mobilizing state machinery to carry out political persecution. However, as the judicial investigation proceeds, officials of the KMT’s local chapters have been caught red-handed, and have been detained as part of the ongoing investigation into their alleged crimes.
It seems that the civil affairs director was playing with the law, failing to make a clear distinction between party and government while infringing on personal privacy and forging recall documents. Such acts are proof of the lengths the KMT is willing to go to to achieve its goals.
Indigenous DPP Legislator Saidhai Tahovecahe has also recently been made aware that his parents, who had passed away years ago, were on the KMT’s list of signatures.
In the past, the KMT controlled the state machinery, oppressed freedom of speech and contravened human rights during the White Terror era. Although the party has lost power, it still heads most of the local governments in Taiwan. Today, it has been revealed that KMT officials mobilized municipal machinery to carry out terrible political persecution.
If Taiwan wants to enjoy true freedom and democracy, apart from carrying out recall campaigns against KMT lawmakers, it is also necessary to convince Taiwanese to change the local political map, so the public can rid itself of the shadow of the White Terror era once and for all.
Chen Chi-nung is principal of Shuili Junior-High School in Nantou County.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) on Wednesday last week announced it is launching investigations into 16 US trading partners, including Taiwan, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to determine whether they have engaged in unfair trade practices, such as overproduction. A day later, the agency announced a separate Section 301 investigation into 60 economies based on the implementation of measures to prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor. Several of Taiwan’s main trading rivals — including China, Japan, South Korea and the EU — also made the US’ investigation list. The announcements come
Taiwan is not invited to the table. It never has been, but this year, with the Philippines holding the ASEAN chair, the question that matters is no longer who gets formally named, it is who becomes structurally indispensable. The “one China” formula continues to do its job. It sets the outer boundary of official diplomatic speech, and no one in the region has a serious interest in openly challenging it. However, beneath the surface, something is thickening. Trade corridors, digital infrastructure, artificial intelligence (AI) cooperation, supply chains, cross-border investment: The connective tissue between Taiwan and ASEAN is quietly and methodically growing