The No. 2 reactor at the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County is to be decommissioned on May 17. It is the last operating reactor in Taiwan, marking the nation’s official entry into the era of a “nuclear-free homeland.”
Although nuclear energy only accounts for about 3 percent of Taiwan’s electricity supply, the symbolic turning point has given rise to intense backlash from people who advocate nuclear power. Some people have even launched personal attacks against Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝). These extreme actions reflect an underlying anxiety over the potential implementation of a “nuclear-free homeland” policy.
Over the past year, criticism of Taiwan’s energy policy has largely fixated on the oversimplified argument that restarting the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s Gongliao District (貢寮) would solve all of the nation’s energy issues. The Ministry of Economic Affairs has said multiple times that the country’s power generation is sufficient, but nuclear advocates have continued to claim that decommissioning all nuclear power plants would lead to an energy shortage.
Although Taiwan Power Co’s (Taipower) losses are due to rising international fuel prices, nuclear advocates insist that blame for its losses are due to the decommissioning of nuclear power plants. Despite continual improvements in carbon emissions and air pollution from thermal power generation, nuclear advocates still blame them for air pollution, while they say that wind and solar energy would be unnecessary if nuclear plants were used.
They assert that nuclear power is a cure-all for every aspect of energy policy, as if recommissioning Taiwan’s nuclear reactors would solve all of the nation’s energy issues once and for all.
Kuo has said that there are several reasons for Taipower’s losses. According to financial reports, in addition to increasing international fuel prices, the legislature’s cuts to government subsidies have also worsened Taipower’s deficit.
However, some use this as an excuse to manipulate public opinion and demand the extension of nuclear power generation. In doing so, they deliberately downplay the trend of renewable energy development, and disregard the risks of nuclear energy and the costs associated with nuclear waste management.
Some Taipower employees have protested. While they are exercising their free speech, their actions do not represent the company’s stance.
Implementing a non-nuclear policy is not a rejection of science — it simply reflects the reality that Taiwan’s small size and high population density make it ill-equipped to bear the risks of a major nuclear disaster.
The nuclear disaster at the Fukushima Dai-ichi plant in 2011 is proof that even technologically advanced countries cannot completely control the technology, while the areas that are affected often far exceed expectations. If Taiwan were to face a similar disaster, the consequences could be unbearable.
That being said, if future generations of nuclear energy technology pass safety inspections, they could be a viable option.
However, that would require thorough planning and professional reviews — emotionally charged criticism cannot take the place of pragmatic discussions.
In March, Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) said that the government would not rule out new nuclear energy investments, but that is entirely different from demanding the resignation of ministers or using political tactics to force a reversal of the energy policy.
Wang Chih-chien is a distinguished professor at National Taipei University’s Graduate Institute of Information Management.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Within Taiwan’s education system exists a long-standing and deep-rooted culture of falsification. In the past month, a large number of “ghost signatures” — signatures using the names of deceased people — appeared on recall petitions submitted by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) against Democratic Progressive Party legislators Rosalia Wu (吳思瑤) and Wu Pei-yi (吳沛憶). An investigation revealed a high degree of overlap between the deceased signatories and the KMT’s membership roster. It also showed that documents had been forged. However, that culture of cheating and fabrication did not just appear out of thin air — it is linked to the
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
Taiwan People’s Party Legislator-at-large Liu Shu-pin (劉書彬) asked Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) a question on Tuesday last week about President William Lai’s (賴清德) decision in March to officially define the People’s Republic of China (PRC), as governed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), as a foreign hostile force. Liu objected to Lai’s decision on two grounds. First, procedurally, suggesting that Lai did not have the right to unilaterally make that decision, and that Cho should have consulted with the Executive Yuan before he endorsed it. Second, Liu objected over national security concerns, saying that the CCP and Chinese President Xi
China’s partnership with Pakistan has long served as a key instrument in Beijing’s efforts to unsettle India. While official narratives frame the two nations’ alliance as one of economic cooperation and regional stability, the underlying strategy suggests a deliberate attempt to check India’s rise through military, economic and diplomatic maneuvering. China’s growing influence in Pakistan is deeply intertwined with its own global ambitions. The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), a flagship project of the Belt and Road Initiative, offers China direct access to the Arabian Sea, bypassing potentially vulnerable trade routes. For Pakistan, these investments provide critical infrastructure, yet they also
RSS