The No. 2 reactor at the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County is to be decommissioned on May 17. It is the last operating reactor in Taiwan, marking the nation’s official entry into the era of a “nuclear-free homeland.”
Although nuclear energy only accounts for about 3 percent of Taiwan’s electricity supply, the symbolic turning point has given rise to intense backlash from people who advocate nuclear power. Some people have even launched personal attacks against Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝). These extreme actions reflect an underlying anxiety over the potential implementation of a “nuclear-free homeland” policy.
Over the past year, criticism of Taiwan’s energy policy has largely fixated on the oversimplified argument that restarting the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s Gongliao District (貢寮) would solve all of the nation’s energy issues. The Ministry of Economic Affairs has said multiple times that the country’s power generation is sufficient, but nuclear advocates have continued to claim that decommissioning all nuclear power plants would lead to an energy shortage.
Although Taiwan Power Co’s (Taipower) losses are due to rising international fuel prices, nuclear advocates insist that blame for its losses are due to the decommissioning of nuclear power plants. Despite continual improvements in carbon emissions and air pollution from thermal power generation, nuclear advocates still blame them for air pollution, while they say that wind and solar energy would be unnecessary if nuclear plants were used.
They assert that nuclear power is a cure-all for every aspect of energy policy, as if recommissioning Taiwan’s nuclear reactors would solve all of the nation’s energy issues once and for all.
Kuo has said that there are several reasons for Taipower’s losses. According to financial reports, in addition to increasing international fuel prices, the legislature’s cuts to government subsidies have also worsened Taipower’s deficit.
However, some use this as an excuse to manipulate public opinion and demand the extension of nuclear power generation. In doing so, they deliberately downplay the trend of renewable energy development, and disregard the risks of nuclear energy and the costs associated with nuclear waste management.
Some Taipower employees have protested. While they are exercising their free speech, their actions do not represent the company’s stance.
Implementing a non-nuclear policy is not a rejection of science — it simply reflects the reality that Taiwan’s small size and high population density make it ill-equipped to bear the risks of a major nuclear disaster.
The nuclear disaster at the Fukushima Dai-ichi plant in 2011 is proof that even technologically advanced countries cannot completely control the technology, while the areas that are affected often far exceed expectations. If Taiwan were to face a similar disaster, the consequences could be unbearable.
That being said, if future generations of nuclear energy technology pass safety inspections, they could be a viable option.
However, that would require thorough planning and professional reviews — emotionally charged criticism cannot take the place of pragmatic discussions.
In March, Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) said that the government would not rule out new nuclear energy investments, but that is entirely different from demanding the resignation of ministers or using political tactics to force a reversal of the energy policy.
Wang Chih-chien is a distinguished professor at National Taipei University’s Graduate Institute of Information Management.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS