On April 19, a large-scale protest to counter Beijing’s political influence was held in Taipei. The rally, called “Reject United Front, Defend Taiwan,” was organized by YouTuber Pa Chiung (八炯) in partnership with the Anti-Communist, Safeguard Taiwan Volunteers Alliance. It drew an estimated 55,000 participants, bringing together people from diverse backgrounds, ideologies and political affiliations to voice their concerns.
This diversity was most evident in the array of flags displayed at the rally, including rainbow flags, the national flags of the US and Japan, Revive ROC Freedom Party flags and Snow Lion flags, among others. However, the most striking image at the scene was the Republic of China (ROC) flag flying alongside the Taiwan independence flag, which feature a whale totem and the words “I stand for Taiwan independence.”
It was an unprecedented sight, as the two flags stand for sharply polarizing ideologies. The two flags can be seen as the embodiment of the two major political parties — the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). The deep ideological divide between the two parties, rooted in conflicting views on national identity, cross-strait relations and Taiwan’s political future, has long been a seemingly insurmountable barrier dividing the two parties and the public.
This rivalry has long been a source of enduring political tension and conflict, but the dynamic began to shift as the public grew increasingly alarmed at the abuses of power by China-aligned legislators and their undermining of Taiwan’s democratic system.
At the rally, 87-year-old retired major general Chiu Wei-pang (丘衛邦) — a respected figure and staunch anti-communist known for his lifelong loyalty to the ROC — took the stage to call for the recall of pro-China lawmakers, urging a political reckoning to protect the nation’s democratic integrity. Other figures, such as retired air force officer Hsu Pai-yueh (徐柏岳), known as Taiwan’s “Eagle Dad” (鷹爸), and fellow veterans also raised their hands in support. Their actions were especially significant given their unwavering loyalty to the KMT and the constitutional ROC framework — people who would never consider voting for the DPP.
For the first time, the rally brought together staunch ROC supporters and pro-Taiwan independence advocates — a rare moment of unity that generations of politicians have long sought, but failed to realize. It demonstrated that common ground can be found across the blue-green divide, whether one identifies with the ROC, ROC Taiwan or simply Taiwan.
As United Microelectronics Corp founder Robert Tsao (曹興誠) put it: “The blue KMT is anti-communist, and the green DPP protects Taiwan — thus, we should collaborate to fight the red Chinese Communist Party [CCP].”
Tsao’s words could not have been more pragmatic, as anti-communism and protecting Taiwan are at the core of what the KMT and the DPP were founded upon. Like two sides of the same coin, the blue and green camps can find common ground in their opposition to communism. For too long, Taiwan has been plagued by internal divisions, exacerbated by China’s ongoing cognitive warfare, distracting the public from the real threat posed by Beijing.
The April 19 rally showed that countering the CCP is the strongest foundation of a bipartisan consensus in Taiwanese society. It also showed that the public is capable of coming together in solidarity on this crucial issue. This unity is what would keep Taiwan beyond the clutches of China — and what democratic allies hope to see.
With firm resolve, it is time for the public to stand together in rooting out the Trojan horses within the legislature and to restore the KMT to its original blue identity, free from the influence of pro-Beijing members who have tinted it red.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS