On April 19, a large-scale protest to counter Beijing’s political influence was held in Taipei. The rally, called “Reject United Front, Defend Taiwan,” was organized by YouTuber Pa Chiung (八炯) in partnership with the Anti-Communist, Safeguard Taiwan Volunteers Alliance. It drew an estimated 55,000 participants, bringing together people from diverse backgrounds, ideologies and political affiliations to voice their concerns.
This diversity was most evident in the array of flags displayed at the rally, including rainbow flags, the national flags of the US and Japan, Revive ROC Freedom Party flags and Snow Lion flags, among others. However, the most striking image at the scene was the Republic of China (ROC) flag flying alongside the Taiwan independence flag, which feature a whale totem and the words “I stand for Taiwan independence.”
It was an unprecedented sight, as the two flags stand for sharply polarizing ideologies. The two flags can be seen as the embodiment of the two major political parties — the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). The deep ideological divide between the two parties, rooted in conflicting views on national identity, cross-strait relations and Taiwan’s political future, has long been a seemingly insurmountable barrier dividing the two parties and the public.
This rivalry has long been a source of enduring political tension and conflict, but the dynamic began to shift as the public grew increasingly alarmed at the abuses of power by China-aligned legislators and their undermining of Taiwan’s democratic system.
At the rally, 87-year-old retired major general Chiu Wei-pang (丘衛邦) — a respected figure and staunch anti-communist known for his lifelong loyalty to the ROC — took the stage to call for the recall of pro-China lawmakers, urging a political reckoning to protect the nation’s democratic integrity. Other figures, such as retired air force officer Hsu Pai-yueh (徐柏岳), known as Taiwan’s “Eagle Dad” (鷹爸), and fellow veterans also raised their hands in support. Their actions were especially significant given their unwavering loyalty to the KMT and the constitutional ROC framework — people who would never consider voting for the DPP.
For the first time, the rally brought together staunch ROC supporters and pro-Taiwan independence advocates — a rare moment of unity that generations of politicians have long sought, but failed to realize. It demonstrated that common ground can be found across the blue-green divide, whether one identifies with the ROC, ROC Taiwan or simply Taiwan.
As United Microelectronics Corp founder Robert Tsao (曹興誠) put it: “The blue KMT is anti-communist, and the green DPP protects Taiwan — thus, we should collaborate to fight the red Chinese Communist Party [CCP].”
Tsao’s words could not have been more pragmatic, as anti-communism and protecting Taiwan are at the core of what the KMT and the DPP were founded upon. Like two sides of the same coin, the blue and green camps can find common ground in their opposition to communism. For too long, Taiwan has been plagued by internal divisions, exacerbated by China’s ongoing cognitive warfare, distracting the public from the real threat posed by Beijing.
The April 19 rally showed that countering the CCP is the strongest foundation of a bipartisan consensus in Taiwanese society. It also showed that the public is capable of coming together in solidarity on this crucial issue. This unity is what would keep Taiwan beyond the clutches of China — and what democratic allies hope to see.
With firm resolve, it is time for the public to stand together in rooting out the Trojan horses within the legislature and to restore the KMT to its original blue identity, free from the influence of pro-Beijing members who have tinted it red.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
Within Taiwan’s education system exists a long-standing and deep-rooted culture of falsification. In the past month, a large number of “ghost signatures” — signatures using the names of deceased people — appeared on recall petitions submitted by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) against Democratic Progressive Party legislators Rosalia Wu (吳思瑤) and Wu Pei-yi (吳沛憶). An investigation revealed a high degree of overlap between the deceased signatories and the KMT’s membership roster. It also showed that documents had been forged. However, that culture of cheating and fabrication did not just appear out of thin air — it is linked to the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to