On April 19, a large-scale protest to counter Beijing’s political influence was held in Taipei. The rally, called “Reject United Front, Defend Taiwan,” was organized by YouTuber Pa Chiung (八炯) in partnership with the Anti-Communist, Safeguard Taiwan Volunteers Alliance. It drew an estimated 55,000 participants, bringing together people from diverse backgrounds, ideologies and political affiliations to voice their concerns.
This diversity was most evident in the array of flags displayed at the rally, including rainbow flags, the national flags of the US and Japan, Revive ROC Freedom Party flags and Snow Lion flags, among others. However, the most striking image at the scene was the Republic of China (ROC) flag flying alongside the Taiwan independence flag, which feature a whale totem and the words “I stand for Taiwan independence.”
It was an unprecedented sight, as the two flags stand for sharply polarizing ideologies. The two flags can be seen as the embodiment of the two major political parties — the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). The deep ideological divide between the two parties, rooted in conflicting views on national identity, cross-strait relations and Taiwan’s political future, has long been a seemingly insurmountable barrier dividing the two parties and the public.
This rivalry has long been a source of enduring political tension and conflict, but the dynamic began to shift as the public grew increasingly alarmed at the abuses of power by China-aligned legislators and their undermining of Taiwan’s democratic system.
At the rally, 87-year-old retired major general Chiu Wei-pang (丘衛邦) — a respected figure and staunch anti-communist known for his lifelong loyalty to the ROC — took the stage to call for the recall of pro-China lawmakers, urging a political reckoning to protect the nation’s democratic integrity. Other figures, such as retired air force officer Hsu Pai-yueh (徐柏岳), known as Taiwan’s “Eagle Dad” (鷹爸), and fellow veterans also raised their hands in support. Their actions were especially significant given their unwavering loyalty to the KMT and the constitutional ROC framework — people who would never consider voting for the DPP.
For the first time, the rally brought together staunch ROC supporters and pro-Taiwan independence advocates — a rare moment of unity that generations of politicians have long sought, but failed to realize. It demonstrated that common ground can be found across the blue-green divide, whether one identifies with the ROC, ROC Taiwan or simply Taiwan.
As United Microelectronics Corp founder Robert Tsao (曹興誠) put it: “The blue KMT is anti-communist, and the green DPP protects Taiwan — thus, we should collaborate to fight the red Chinese Communist Party [CCP].”
Tsao’s words could not have been more pragmatic, as anti-communism and protecting Taiwan are at the core of what the KMT and the DPP were founded upon. Like two sides of the same coin, the blue and green camps can find common ground in their opposition to communism. For too long, Taiwan has been plagued by internal divisions, exacerbated by China’s ongoing cognitive warfare, distracting the public from the real threat posed by Beijing.
The April 19 rally showed that countering the CCP is the strongest foundation of a bipartisan consensus in Taiwanese society. It also showed that the public is capable of coming together in solidarity on this crucial issue. This unity is what would keep Taiwan beyond the clutches of China — and what democratic allies hope to see.
With firm resolve, it is time for the public to stand together in rooting out the Trojan horses within the legislature and to restore the KMT to its original blue identity, free from the influence of pro-Beijing members who have tinted it red.
On March 22, 2023, at the close of their meeting in Moscow, media microphones were allowed to record Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) telling Russia’s dictator Vladimir Putin, “Right now there are changes — the likes of which we haven’t seen for 100 years — and we are the ones driving these changes together.” Widely read as Xi’s oath to create a China-Russia-dominated world order, it can be considered a high point for the China-Russia-Iran-North Korea (CRINK) informal alliance, which also included the dictatorships of Venezuela and Cuba. China enables and assists Russia’s war against Ukraine and North Korea’s
After thousands of Taiwanese fans poured into the Tokyo Dome to cheer for Taiwan’s national team in the World Baseball Classic’s (WBC) Pool C games, an image of food and drink waste left at the stadium said to have been left by Taiwanese fans began spreading on social media. The image sparked wide debate, only later to be revealed as an artificially generated image. The image caption claimed that “Taiwanese left trash everywhere after watching the game in Tokyo Dome,” and said that one of the “three bad habits” of Taiwanese is littering. However, a reporter from a Japanese media outlet
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework