Sydney non-profit worker Az Fahmi was once a dedicated volunteer for Australia’s ruling Labor Party, handing out pamphlets to get her local representative, Australian Minister for Home Affairs Tony Burke, re-elected.
That all changed for the human rights activist following Israel’s retaliation for an attack by Hamas militants in 2023, which has left Gaza in rubble, displaced millions and killed more than 50,000 Palestinians, according to Palestinian officials.
Ahead of the election tomorrow, Fahmi is now campaigning to oust Burke over what she believes is his party’s “dismal” response to the Muslim community’s calls for the Australian government to support Palestinians in Gaza.
“The only time they will ever listen is during election time,” said Fahmi, who identifies as Muslim and has Syrian-Iraqi ancestry.
In Brisbane, stay-at-home mother Hava Mendelle, who identifies as Jewish, backed Labor for its climate policies last election, but now leads a campaign with hundreds of volunteers to topple “a weak Labor government that hasn’t done enough” to stop a spate of anti-Semitic attacks.
The discontent of voters such as Fahmi and Mendelle highlights how the war in Gaza has fractured support for Labor, a party seeking to fend off the conservative Liberal-National opposition and win a second term in power.
Since late 2023, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s government has walked a fine line between expressing concern for Palestinians, repeatedly calling for a ceasefire and supporting ally Israel’s right to self-defense.
The approach has angered pro-Palestinian and pro-Israel voters, leaving Labor vulnerable in at least nine of the lower house seats it needs to hold onto its one-seat majority in parliament, election experts said.
Fahmi’s electorate is among three multicultural, working-class seats in western Sydney that have long been Labor strongholds, where up to one in three voters is Muslim, despite making up just 3.2 percent of Australia’s population.
Similarly, Jewish Australians are just 0.5 percent of the overall population, but make up to one-sixth of voters in wealthy inner-city electorates in Sydney and Melbourne.
The demographics of the two could result in big swings against incumbent lawmakers, election experts said.
Independent election analyst William Bowe said Labor could face a damaging 20 percent swing against it in western Sydney, where incumbents secured just more than half the primary vote in 2022, mirroring the Labor Party’s losses last year due to a Muslim voter backlash over the war in Gaza.
Centre for Western Sydney executive director Andy Marks said Muslim voters were not “homogenous,” and local issues such as healthcare and housing typically took precedence over events on the other side of the world.
However, at this Australian election, family connections to the Middle East had brought the Gaza war home to many voters.
“The rule for western Sydney is all politics is local,” Marks said.
For Muslims, “the immediacy of events in the Middle East, through social media, through family connections, makes those issues for some feel very local,” he said.
Ziad Basyouny, a Muslim doctor who is running against Burke, said he had felt ignored living in a safe Labor electorate for two decades, but “when the Gaza issue came up, that was like the straw that broke the camel’s back.”
Under Australia’s complex preferential voting system, if no candidate receives more than half the primary vote, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated and preferences are redistributed until a winner emerges. That means a candidate can lead with 49 percent of the primary vote, but still lose.
Independents such as Basyouny could make up for a lack of primary votes by striking deals with other candidates to favor each other in how-to-vote cards handed out at polling booths — a strategy lower-profile candidates sometimes use to maximize chances of winning or block shared adversaries.
The Muslim Vote, a grassroots organization supporting three candidates including Basyouny, saw a “really strong appetite at the moment to put Labor last” in how-to-vote cards, said sheikh Wesam Charkawi, the group’s convener.
Local media has reported that the opposition conservative coalition has ruled out a deal with pro-Palestine groups and instead leaned into support for the Jewish community, criticizing Albanese for being weak on anti-Semitism.
The coalition opposition has fronted up pro-Israel candidates in Sydney’s affluent eastern suburbs and in inner-Melbourne, home to Australia’s biggest Jewish populations, in hopes of winning back seats that fell to environment-focused independents in 2022.
In Sydney, conservative candidate Ro Knox studied at Hebrew University in Jerusalem, while independent incumbent Allegra Spender faced a backlash from Jewish constituents for supporting funding to the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA).
On Bondi Beach, Sydney resident Shaun Eliastam said Knox had his vote. Spender should have disavowed UNRWA instead of “trying to play both sides,” he said.
“When one is bad and one is good, you can’t please two people. You need to take a side,” he added.
Melbourne conservative candidate Tim Wilson is campaigning with a slogan “proudly Zionist” although he is not Jewish, challenging independent Zoe Daniel’s seat.
“I think for the first time in the history of our community, people will be voting primarily on the issue of Israel and anti-Semitism,” Executive Council of Australian Jewry cochief executive Alex Ryvchin said.
Although Mendelle’s Brisbane electorate has a small Jewish population, she said her group would target about 10 seats across Australia’s eastern states with a campaign involving social media and billboards, aiming to boost conservatives.
Fahmi said she still wanted a minority Labor government, where independents such as Basyouny can hold power.
“What happened in Gaza really mobilized people,” she said. “I don’t think our local representatives realized how important this issue is to many people.”
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
RSS