Learning from immersion
Learning a new language can be a slow, academic grind — flashcards, grammar drills and vocabulary memorization. However, when you are surrounded by the language every day — when it becomes your tool for survival — something incredible happens.
I moved to Taiwan in 2021. Formal Chinese lessons began when school started, but progress felt slow. My classes were in English, and even with intensive sessions at the Chinese Language Center, I felt stuck. I was learning words, but not truly using them.
Then I got a job at a Chinese restaurant. Suddenly, Mandarin was not just a subject — it was my lifeline. I had to talk to customers, take orders and work under pressure, all in Chinese. I learned dish names, practiced pronunciation, made countless mistakes and cried more than once. My manager scolded me often, and I nearly quit, but little by little, I adjusted.
Chinese is often seen as one of the most difficult languages. The traditional characters are complex, the tones are subtle, and the cultural context is deeply layered. Yet, when you walk the streets of Kaohsiung, hear Mandarin on the MRT, see characters on every corner, you are no longer just “studying” the language. You are living it.
Immersion forces you to use the language — not perfectly, but purposefully. It transforms learning from passive to personal. It does not just teach you grammar — it teaches you resilience, confidence and connection. In just three months, I was functional. I could speak, listen and connect. Mandarin became a bridge, not a barrier. I stopped memorizing and started communicating. I began to belong.
As Taiwan pushes forward with the Bilingual 2030 initiative, it is worth asking: How can we create similar immersive experiences for English learners here?
Many students in Taiwan still approach English the way I once approached Chinese — as an exam subject, not a real-life tool — but what if English-language internships, exchange programs, or part-time work in tourism and hospitality were integrated into the national curriculum? These practical, hands-on experiences would allow students to engage with English in meaningful contexts — giving directions to tourists, working at bilingual events, or helping at local museums and cafes. Instead of studying English, they would start using it.
Communities can support this shift by creating inclusive, low-pressure environments for natural English use, such as local conversation clubs, language cafes, or public storytelling sessions. These spaces would allow students to make mistakes, try again, and grow more confident. They would also help normalize English as part of everyday life.
Kellyn Marvelina Sadeliputri
Kaohsiung
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
RSS