One of Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto’s flagship programs in Indonesia is initiating a free nutritious lunch (MBG) program for elementary and middle-school students. The policy has drawn sharp criticism due to the cost.
Based on a 2017 report from the World Food Programme (WFP), school lunch provisions contribute to the achievement of the world’s sustainable development goals.
School meal programs such as MBG can contribute to zero hunger, increased participation and learning ability, and gender equality. WFP research states that school meal programs can have a direct impact on children, improving nutrition, health and education levels. That direct impact would then have a further impact on poverty reduction, inequality and economic improvement.
Based on the WFP economic model, every dollar of the budget invested in school would bring US$3 to US$10 in calculated economic return from improved health, education and productivity.
Developed countries in East Asia, such as Taiwan, Japan and South Korea, have been implementing school meals programs for decades. Taiwan has implemented a nutritious lunch program in schools since 1982. Taiwan’s experience can provide positive input to improve similar programs in Indonesia.
First, the free (fully subsidized) nutritious meal program in Taiwan is only provided to financially distressed students, those from disadvantaged backgrounds, remote and rural areas, or those residing in specific government-designated areas. For students without economic difficulties, the Taiwanese government subsidizes the cost of the student’s lunch.
Indonesia offers free nutritious lunches to all students, which has drawn criticism from the public due to the cost. Indonesia can revise the free nutritious meal policy to a nutritious meal for students that shares the burden between the government and parents. The free-of-charge policy should only be given to poor, economically disadvantaged students, and students in remote areas.
Second, Taiwan deploys a technology called cloud GPS positioning and tracking that monitors food delivery routes, timing and temperatures, not only to ensure the timeliness of food delivery, but also to check food sources and safety. The use of this technology enhances transparency in managing students’ nutritious meal programs.
The program implementers in Indonesia, such as the National Nutrition Agency (BGN) and the Nutrition Fulfillment Service Unit (SPPG), can deploy advanced technology to monitor food temperatures, GPS for logistics management and food delivery, and other information systems that can be monitored by policymakers.
Third, Taiwan’s Ministry of Education has established standards for the nutritional content of school lunches and has also created a publicly accessible online platform where anyone can view the daily menus in detail. Non-governmental organizations and the public can see the menu served in each school every day as a public oversight space. Furthermore, the nonprofit Douceur Network partners with Taiwan’s education ministry to conduct research on school lunch policies in Taiwan, Japan and South Korea. The institution also hosts various workshops, academics, and public forums to discuss program improvements.
Indonesia could draw the lesson for better public supervision. Transparency of the school lunch program will allow for a discourse that is expected to provide room for program improvement. Among them is the supervision of the budget, menu and food safety, which can ultimately have an impact on the support and contribution from various parties to make this program a success.
Finally, Indonesia should open up space for dialogue and cooperation with countries and world organizations such as the WFP, to support the success of the program. Indonesia needs to admit that the country still lacks experience in managing nutritious school lunch programs. It should therefore build partnerships with other countries and organizations to absorb good practices and lessons learned in the implementation of similar programs.
That can also give the impression that it is not only Indonesia that implements a nutritious meal program in schools, but also other developed countries such as Taiwan, Japan and South Korea. Taiwan itself has conducted several school lunch exchange programs with Japan leading to the term school-lunch diplomacy.
In addition, the BGN and SPPG in Indonesia need to start using information and communications technology to ensure timeliness, food safety and transparency. Indonesia also needs to open cooperation and dialogue with various partners to ensure that its nutritious lunch program adopts the same standards on a par with that in developed countries.
Raden Mokhamad Luthfi is a doctoral candidate in international relations at National Chengchi University and deputy chairman of the Indonesian Student Association in Taiwan.
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
On the eve of the 80th anniversary of Victory in Europe (VE) Day, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) made a statement that provoked unprecedented repudiations among the European diplomats in Taipei. Chu said during a KMT Central Standing Committee meeting that what President William Lai (賴清德) has been doing to the opposition is equivalent to what Adolf Hitler did in Nazi Germany, referencing ongoing investigations into the KMT’s alleged forgery of signatures used in recall petitions against Democratic Progressive Party legislators. In response, the German Institute Taipei posted a statement to express its “deep disappointment and concern”
RSS