Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Taipei chapter director Huang Lu Chin-ju (黃呂錦茹) on Friday last week was detained and held incommunicado for allegedly agreeing to or instructing the use of forged signatures to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators.
The KMT, supported by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), on Saturday held a large rally in front of the Presidential Office Building framing it as a fight against “anti-green communists and dictatorship,” and claiming that the DPP is carrying out political purges against opposition parties.
KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) said that the DPP has manipulated the judiciary to prosecute and criminally charge KMT members, calling it “judicial injustice” and the “darkest day in Taiwan’s democracy.”
Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) of the KMT called for prosecutors to not be “political tools” of the government.
Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) said it is unfair to “only prosecute the blue and not the green.”
Several KMT legislators said the detention of Huang is “against the proportionality principle.” Seven-time KMT Legislator Lai Shyh-bao (賴士葆) said that “even if they [recall proposal initiators] made a mistake, it is only forgery ... which has always been punished very lightly,” while KMT Legislator Lo Chih-chiang (羅智強) repeatedly asked Ministry of Justice Investigation Bureau Director-General Chen Pai-li (陳白立) whether the bureau also searched the DPP headquarters.
However, all of them neglected the “proportionality principle” and failed to answer why among 35 petitions to recall KMT legislators, only 12 cases of signatures from deceased people were found, while among 17 proposals to recall DPP legislators, 1,784 cases of signatures from deceased people were found.
Two former KMT members even said that their names were used as recall proposal initiators without their consent.
The argument behind the KMT’s rally on Saturday is clearly untenable. Ironically, the ability to organize a large public rally demonstrated that the government is not a dictatorship, in sharp contrast to how countless Taiwanese were killed or imprisoned during the decades-long White Terror era during the rule of former presidents Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and his son Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國), both of the KMT.
Moreover, the KMT is deliberately avoiding the real issue — the number of suspected forged signatures of deceased people in their petitions is about 150 times that of the petitions to recall 35 KMT legislators — by prevaricating and trying to undermine public confidence in judicial independence.
The KMT has also learned from the TPP to frame any prosecution against its members as “political persecution” to gain sympathy or fuel contempt toward the DPP-led government, mainly to help save its legislators from being recalled, but voters are unlikely to be fooled so easily. Civic groups’ recall campaigns against KMT lawmakers have already set a good example of how signatures can be collected with diligence and integrity, in clear contrast to the KMT-led recall campaigns.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS