Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Taipei chapter director Huang Lu Chin-ju (黃呂錦茹) on Friday last week was detained and held incommunicado for allegedly agreeing to or instructing the use of forged signatures to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators.
The KMT, supported by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), on Saturday held a large rally in front of the Presidential Office Building framing it as a fight against “anti-green communists and dictatorship,” and claiming that the DPP is carrying out political purges against opposition parties.
KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) said that the DPP has manipulated the judiciary to prosecute and criminally charge KMT members, calling it “judicial injustice” and the “darkest day in Taiwan’s democracy.”
Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) of the KMT called for prosecutors to not be “political tools” of the government.
Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) said it is unfair to “only prosecute the blue and not the green.”
Several KMT legislators said the detention of Huang is “against the proportionality principle.” Seven-time KMT Legislator Lai Shyh-bao (賴士葆) said that “even if they [recall proposal initiators] made a mistake, it is only forgery ... which has always been punished very lightly,” while KMT Legislator Lo Chih-chiang (羅智強) repeatedly asked Ministry of Justice Investigation Bureau Director-General Chen Pai-li (陳白立) whether the bureau also searched the DPP headquarters.
However, all of them neglected the “proportionality principle” and failed to answer why among 35 petitions to recall KMT legislators, only 12 cases of signatures from deceased people were found, while among 17 proposals to recall DPP legislators, 1,784 cases of signatures from deceased people were found.
Two former KMT members even said that their names were used as recall proposal initiators without their consent.
The argument behind the KMT’s rally on Saturday is clearly untenable. Ironically, the ability to organize a large public rally demonstrated that the government is not a dictatorship, in sharp contrast to how countless Taiwanese were killed or imprisoned during the decades-long White Terror era during the rule of former presidents Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and his son Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國), both of the KMT.
Moreover, the KMT is deliberately avoiding the real issue — the number of suspected forged signatures of deceased people in their petitions is about 150 times that of the petitions to recall 35 KMT legislators — by prevaricating and trying to undermine public confidence in judicial independence.
The KMT has also learned from the TPP to frame any prosecution against its members as “political persecution” to gain sympathy or fuel contempt toward the DPP-led government, mainly to help save its legislators from being recalled, but voters are unlikely to be fooled so easily. Civic groups’ recall campaigns against KMT lawmakers have already set a good example of how signatures can be collected with diligence and integrity, in clear contrast to the KMT-led recall campaigns.
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS