Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Taipei chapter director Huang Lu Chin-ju (黃呂錦茹) on Friday last week was detained and held incommunicado for allegedly agreeing to or instructing the use of forged signatures to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators.
The KMT, supported by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), on Saturday held a large rally in front of the Presidential Office Building framing it as a fight against “anti-green communists and dictatorship,” and claiming that the DPP is carrying out political purges against opposition parties.
KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) said that the DPP has manipulated the judiciary to prosecute and criminally charge KMT members, calling it “judicial injustice” and the “darkest day in Taiwan’s democracy.”
Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) of the KMT called for prosecutors to not be “political tools” of the government.
Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) said it is unfair to “only prosecute the blue and not the green.”
Several KMT legislators said the detention of Huang is “against the proportionality principle.” Seven-time KMT Legislator Lai Shyh-bao (賴士葆) said that “even if they [recall proposal initiators] made a mistake, it is only forgery ... which has always been punished very lightly,” while KMT Legislator Lo Chih-chiang (羅智強) repeatedly asked Ministry of Justice Investigation Bureau Director-General Chen Pai-li (陳白立) whether the bureau also searched the DPP headquarters.
However, all of them neglected the “proportionality principle” and failed to answer why among 35 petitions to recall KMT legislators, only 12 cases of signatures from deceased people were found, while among 17 proposals to recall DPP legislators, 1,784 cases of signatures from deceased people were found.
Two former KMT members even said that their names were used as recall proposal initiators without their consent.
The argument behind the KMT’s rally on Saturday is clearly untenable. Ironically, the ability to organize a large public rally demonstrated that the government is not a dictatorship, in sharp contrast to how countless Taiwanese were killed or imprisoned during the decades-long White Terror era during the rule of former presidents Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and his son Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國), both of the KMT.
Moreover, the KMT is deliberately avoiding the real issue — the number of suspected forged signatures of deceased people in their petitions is about 150 times that of the petitions to recall 35 KMT legislators — by prevaricating and trying to undermine public confidence in judicial independence.
The KMT has also learned from the TPP to frame any prosecution against its members as “political persecution” to gain sympathy or fuel contempt toward the DPP-led government, mainly to help save its legislators from being recalled, but voters are unlikely to be fooled so easily. Civic groups’ recall campaigns against KMT lawmakers have already set a good example of how signatures can be collected with diligence and integrity, in clear contrast to the KMT-led recall campaigns.
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily
RSS