Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi promised that he would bring peace to Kashmir. Tuesday’s terror attack that killed at least 26 people at a popular tourist destination shows how misguided he was — when long-suffering grievances are not addressed, they erupt.
Modi has condemned the violence, saying those behind it “will not be spared,” and cut short a trip to Saudi Arabia to deal with the unfolding crisis. Schools and shops in the Muslim-majority province are closed in response to what Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah described as one of the largest attacks on civilians in recent years.
This is not an isolated event. There has been a spate of incidents, far less publicized, that show militant violence never subsided — contradicting Modi’s claims that normalcy has returned under his leadership.
Kashmir is anything but normal — it is one of the world’s most heavily militarized zones.
The region’s modern-day crisis has its roots in the bloody partition of 1947, when British-ruled India was divided into two independent nations: India and Pakistan. The regions of Jammu and Kashmir had the opportunity to choose which side they would eventually accede to, Hindu-dominated India or Muslim-majority Pakistan.
Initially Kashmir’s monarch sought independence, but ultimately he agreed to join India. The eventual outcome was a unique arrangement under Article 370, which granted Kashmir special semi-autonomous status, its own constitution and even a separate flag.
India and Pakistan — both nuclear-armed nations — have fought several conflicts since independence and Kashmir has been at the heart of them. Thousands, including civilians, army, police and militants, have died in the process, either as a result of counterinsurgency exercises or terrorist attacks. Ending that cycle of violence is the reason Modi and Indian Minister of Home Affairs Amit Shah gave when they revoked the state’s special status in 2019.
“The peace that has come to Jammu and Kashmir has to be converted into permanent peace,” Shah said on Feb. 24.
The attack at Pahalgam, about 90km east of the capital, Srinagar, shows that has not materialized.
While it is not immediately clear who was responsible, this is sure to cause tensions between New Delhi and Islamabad. The Pakistani Ministry of Foreign Affairs voiced concern at the loss of tourists’ lives and extended condolences to their families, while Pakistani Minister of Defense Khawaja Asif told local media that Islamabad has no link to the attack. As an opening salvo, India moved to suspend a decades-old water treaty with Islamabad and downgrade diplomatic ties.
Modi had justified revoking Kashmir’s autonomy by saying it was about boosting its economy, but despite grand claims from his Bharatiya Janata Party, there have been limited investments in the territory. If anything, Kashmiris have become even more disempowered during his tenure.
In a region fortified with hundreds of thousands of troops, they have had to deal with rising anti-Islamism and policies aimed at changing the province’s demographics by encouraging Hindu settlers. They are also facing the potential loss of jobs and land ownership rights, while living with relentless interrogations and repressive media policies.
India uses restrictive travel bans and arbitrary detentions under stringent anti-terror laws to intimidate critical dissenting voices from speaking out, Amnesty International said last year ahead of the first regional elections in the past decade. These long-standing grievances came to a head during that poll. Voter turnout was an impressive 63.8 percent, and the Jammu and Kashmir National Conference, the largest political party opposed to India’s revoking Kashmir’s semi-autonomy, won the most seats.
This attack provides an opportunity for New Delhi to address some of these long-simmering issues. Modi’s first instinct would be to further shutter the region. That would be a mistake. All the curbs he put in place in 2019, including the prolonged suspension of Internet services, the detention of political leaders and a strict lockdown, just bred more resentment. Those measures were gradually lifted, but the damage was done.
Modi might be tempted to allow anti-Muslim sentiment to continue running unchecked in mainstream and social media. Again, that would be unwise — he should act as a leader for all Indians and issue a call for restraint. Instead, India has vowed to retaliate, with Shah saying that the nation would not “bend to terror.” Cooler heads should prevail.
Karishma Vaswani is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asian politics with a special focus on China. Previously, she was the BBC’s lead Asia presenter, and worked for the BBC across Asia and South Asia for two decades. This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
US President Donald Trump’s alleged request that Taiwanese President William Lai (賴清德) not stop in New York while traveling to three of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, after his administration also rescheduled a visit to Washington by the minister of national defense, sets an unwise precedent and risks locking the US into a trajectory of either direct conflict with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) or capitulation to it over Taiwan. Taiwanese authorities have said that no plans to request a stopover in the US had been submitted to Washington, but Trump shared a direct call with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平)
Heavy rains over the past week have overwhelmed southern and central Taiwan, with flooding, landslides, road closures, damage to property and the evacuations of thousands of people. Schools and offices were closed in some areas due to the deluge throughout the week. The heavy downpours brought by the southwest monsoon are a second blow to a region still recovering from last month’s Typhoon Danas. Strong winds and significant rain from the storm inflicted more than NT$2.6 billion (US$86.6 million) in agricultural losses, and damaged more than 23,000 roofs and a record high of nearly 2,500 utility poles, causing power outages. As
The greatest pressure Taiwan has faced in negotiations stems from its continuously growing trade surplus with the US. Taiwan’s trade surplus with the US reached an unprecedented high last year, surging by 54.6 percent from the previous year and placing it among the top six countries with which the US has a trade deficit. The figures became Washington’s primary reason for adopting its firm stance and demanding substantial concessions from Taipei, which put Taiwan at somewhat of a disadvantage at the negotiating table. Taiwan’s most crucial bargaining chip is undoubtedly its key position in the global semiconductor supply chain, which led
RSS