On Monday last week, a section of the Xiaoyoukeng (小油坑) Recreation Area in Yangmingshan National Park caught fire. Reports said the blaze started due to the overheating of a faulty battery in an air quality sensor belonging to the National Institutes of Applied Research’s (NIAR) Center for High-performance Computing.
With the addition of strong winds, the flames spread for five hours, engulfing 50 hectares of woodland.
The incident not only reveals a huge flaw in the management of research facilities and infrastructure, but also serves as a stark reminder of the gravity of disaster awareness needed for risk management from the extremes of global climate change.
The massive wildfires in South Korea last month are pertinent. The blaze killed scores of people and razed 1,000-year-old Buddhist temples and pagodas — national heritage monuments.
Several wildfires also hit Japan’s Iwate, Ehime and Okayama prefectures. The scope of those fires was startling and authorities in Tokyo listed the fire in Iwate’s Funabashi as an “exacerbated disaster.”
These disasters point to one overarching issue: In an era of climate change, forest fires in mountainous areas have exceeded the capabilities of those fighting them, and now touch upon systems involving risk management, environmental protection and national defense.
If forest fires become the new norm for the world, is Taiwan prepared for what comes next?
The Yangmingshan blaze sheds light on three systemic issues: First, risk assessments for research facilities’ installations are inadequate. Even though the NIAR has said it is waiting for fire assessment results, a faulty sensing device from the Civil Internet of Things Taiwan project seems to be the conflagration’s cause, reflecting a lack of considerations for disaster warnings — from site selection to maintenance.
Second, alpine firefighting teams face obvious hurdles. Taiwan has steep and precipitous terrain in many places, so disaster relief in mountainous areas remains highly reliant on people being capable of carrying equipment up mountainsides. Mechanisms to deploy firefighting helicopters are also imperfect.
The third and most critical issue is the unclear division of management in sensitive areas. As a national park, Yangmingshan seems to have unwittingly permitted potential risks for the NIAR to operate without appropriate preventive measures in a highly combustible environment. This shortsightedness reflects the serious inadequacy of coordination between managing bodies.
In the aftermath of the fire, more attention should be placed on prevention. Fires on Yangmingshan could be averted by adopting three reforms: First, the legislature should strictly enforce a system that stringently checks the accreditation of fire prevention standards and establishes a regular inspection regime.
Second, alpine firefighting brigades should be expanded and use advanced forward mission equipment, such as uncrewed aerial drones with advanced thermal imaging.
Third, a “resilient mountain forest” plan should be developed, climate change risk assessment standards should be established and potential fire sources should be identified and managed.
If large-scale fires break out here, only by bolstering cross-department cooperation and drawing lessons from international firefighting could Taiwan avoid them becoming a collective memory seared into people’s minds from the government’s dereliction and failures.
Increasing environmental resilience in the face of climate change is the right approach.
Siao Hung-jung is an adjunct assistant professor in the Department of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering at Tamkang University. Hu Wen-chi is the spokesman for the People First Party.
Translated by Tim Smith
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
RSS