The Executive Yuan has proposed allocating NT$88 billion (US$2.71 billion) through a special budget — subject to legislative approval — to support Taiwan’s industrial and agricultural sectors impacted by US President Donald Trump’s new tariff policy.
The funds would be distributed by the Ministry of Economic Affairs, the Ministry of Finance, the Ministry of Labor, the Ministry of Agriculture and other agencies. These agencies plan to implement 20 support measures across nine key areas, with detailed application procedures, eligibility criteria and program specifics to be announced by the Cabinet later this week.
While larger corporations have the capability to cope with the unprecedented pressure from US tariffs and global economic uncertainty, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face existential threats.
These firms account for more than 90 percent of Taiwanese businesses and employ nearly 80 percent of the workforce, and have long been the unsung heroes of Taiwan’s economic progress.
However, with the global supply chain shifting from a model of “high efficiency” to one of “high resilience” in response to escalating geopolitical tensions, Taiwanese SMEs must confront daunting but crucial challenges to adapt and endure.
From machine tool makers in Taichung, plumbing fixture suppliers in Changhua County, screw producers in Tainan and Kaohsiung, machinery providers in New Taipei City, and server makers in Taoyuan, the nation’s six largest manufacturing clusters — most of them composed of SMEs — have a total export value of more than NT$1.3 trillion to the US per year.
If the US implements the 32 percent “reciprocal” tariff on Taiwanese goods, it would directly impact more than 200,000 workers and the livelihoods of millions of people, the Chinese-language CommonWealth Magazine reported last week.
In the National Development Council’s analysis of the potential impact of the US’ 32 percent tariffs, it predicted that Taiwan would see a drop of 26 percent in industrial exports to the US and that the local manufacturing sector is likely to report a 5 percent drop in production value in the near term.
Over the longer term, the import duty would also likely lead Taiwanese manufacturers to relocate their factories to Mexico and other countries, impacting Taiwan’s production capacity and hurting domestic employment, the council said last week.
However, SMEs face cash flow risks and potential credit tightening amid economic uncertainty, a weak yen, slowing Chinese and European demand, local labor shortages and rising energy costs — making timely support essential.
Notwithstanding the government’s proposed relief measures and further tariff negotiations with the US, low-profit industries no longer have room to survive in Taiwan. That is because under a tariff war, the international market would become more competitive, and questions have risen about whether the business model of depending on gross margins of 3 to 4 percent would continue to work for SMEs.
In this regard, the government should offer incentives for firms to invest in innovation, such as the use of artificial intelligence and automation in factories, and assist them in moving up the global manufacturing value chain through research and development.
To boost the global competitiveness of Taiwanese SMEs, the government should allocate additional funding to help businesses diversify their export destinations and expand into new markets, especially as the US-China rivalry is expected to persist for the next five to 10 years.
During Trump’s first tariff war in 2018, Taiwanese firms were forced to pursue a “China Plus One” strategy to reduce reliance on Chinese manufacturing.
In his second term, supply chain diversification would remain critical — but SMEs must also seek new customers beyond the US.
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS