Research by the National Museum of Natural Science confirmed that Denisovans — a species of archaic humans — inhabited Penghu 100,000 years ago, revealing for the first time their presence outside areas near present-day Mongolia. The finding not only revealed the complexity of the evolutionary and migratory history of ancient hominids in Asia, but also showed the diversity of the people who comprise Taiwan’s population.
As my mother is from Penghu, I am excited about this news, because I myself might also have a one-in-a-million blood relationship with the Denisovans.
The identity of a nation is not restricted to blood relationships. As another ancient group in Penghu has been added to Taiwan’s diverse origins, this proves that Taiwan should not be locked into a “one China” framework.
I still remember that when former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) was in office, he emphasized the need to sign the cross-strait Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement in 2010. Luckily, the 2014 Sunflower movement blocked the passage of a trade in services agreement, otherwise Taiwanese businesspeople would have been thrown into chaos when the COVID-19 pandemic began or amid US President Donald Trump’s tariff war.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Chen Yu-jen (陳玉珍) is proposing to turn Taiwan’s outlying Kinmen County into a so-called “Kinmen autonomous region.”
However, Trump’s tariff policies put the proposal in a bad light, as it gives rise to suspicions of “origin laundering” of Chinese goods, as well as opening the door to fake Chinese doctors.
If Chen has such great vision, why does she not propose building an international port in Penghu? Everyone would applaud that idea.
Jane Ywe-hwan is an associate professor at National Pingtung University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
A failure by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respond to Israel’s brilliant 12-day (June 12-23) bombing and special operations war against Iran, topped by US President Donald Trump’s ordering the June 21 bombing of Iranian deep underground nuclear weapons fuel processing sites, has been noted by some as demonstrating a profound lack of resolve, even “impotence,” by China. However, this would be a dangerous underestimation of CCP ambitions and its broader and more profound military response to the Trump Administration — a challenge that includes an acceleration of its strategies to assist nuclear proxy states, and developing a wide array
Eating at a breakfast shop the other day, I turned to an old man sitting at the table next to mine. “Hey, did you hear that the Legislative Yuan passed a bill to give everyone NT$10,000 [US$340]?” I said, pointing to a newspaper headline. The old man cursed, then said: “Yeah, the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] canceled the NT$100 billion subsidy for Taiwan Power Co and announced they would give everyone NT$10,000 instead. “Nice. Now they are saying that if electricity prices go up, we can just use that cash to pay for it,” he said. “I have no time for drivel like
Twenty-four Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers are facing recall votes on Saturday, prompting nearly all KMT officials and lawmakers to rally their supporters over the past weekend, urging them to vote “no” in a bid to retain their seats and preserve the KMT’s majority in the Legislative Yuan. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which had largely kept its distance from the civic recall campaigns, earlier this month instructed its officials and staff to support the recall groups in a final push to protect the nation. The justification for the recalls has increasingly been framed as a “resistance” movement against China and
Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) reportedly told the EU’s top diplomat that China does not want Russia to lose in Ukraine, because the US could shift its focus to countering Beijing. Wang made the comment while meeting with EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas on July 2 at the 13th China-EU High-Level Strategic Dialogue in Brussels, the South China Morning Post and CNN reported. Although contrary to China’s claim of neutrality in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, such a frank remark suggests Beijing might prefer a protracted war to keep the US from focusing on
RSS