Research by the National Museum of Natural Science confirmed that Denisovans — a species of archaic humans — inhabited Penghu 100,000 years ago, revealing for the first time their presence outside areas near present-day Mongolia. The finding not only revealed the complexity of the evolutionary and migratory history of ancient hominids in Asia, but also showed the diversity of the people who comprise Taiwan’s population.
As my mother is from Penghu, I am excited about this news, because I myself might also have a one-in-a-million blood relationship with the Denisovans.
The identity of a nation is not restricted to blood relationships. As another ancient group in Penghu has been added to Taiwan’s diverse origins, this proves that Taiwan should not be locked into a “one China” framework.
I still remember that when former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) was in office, he emphasized the need to sign the cross-strait Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement in 2010. Luckily, the 2014 Sunflower movement blocked the passage of a trade in services agreement, otherwise Taiwanese businesspeople would have been thrown into chaos when the COVID-19 pandemic began or amid US President Donald Trump’s tariff war.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Chen Yu-jen (陳玉珍) is proposing to turn Taiwan’s outlying Kinmen County into a so-called “Kinmen autonomous region.”
However, Trump’s tariff policies put the proposal in a bad light, as it gives rise to suspicions of “origin laundering” of Chinese goods, as well as opening the door to fake Chinese doctors.
If Chen has such great vision, why does she not propose building an international port in Penghu? Everyone would applaud that idea.
Jane Ywe-hwan is an associate professor at National Pingtung University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) on Wednesday last week announced it is launching investigations into 16 US trading partners, including Taiwan, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to determine whether they have engaged in unfair trade practices, such as overproduction. A day later, the agency announced a separate Section 301 investigation into 60 economies based on the implementation of measures to prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor. Several of Taiwan’s main trading rivals — including China, Japan, South Korea and the EU — also made the US’ investigation list. The announcements come
Taiwan is not invited to the table. It never has been, but this year, with the Philippines holding the ASEAN chair, the question that matters is no longer who gets formally named, it is who becomes structurally indispensable. The “one China” formula continues to do its job. It sets the outer boundary of official diplomatic speech, and no one in the region has a serious interest in openly challenging it. However, beneath the surface, something is thickening. Trade corridors, digital infrastructure, artificial intelligence (AI) cooperation, supply chains, cross-border investment: The connective tissue between Taiwan and ASEAN is quietly and methodically growing
RSS