Local-for-local manufacturing is becoming more strategically important amid escalating geopolitical and economic tensions between the US and China. Taiwanese electronics firms are moving some manufacturing to the US, while retaining a portion in China and building new capacity in a third region. That is probably the optimal solution amid the chaos US President Donald Trump’s fickle tariff policy has created over the past week. As Trump on Monday wrote on his Truth Social platform that “there was no tariff ‘exception,’” supplying products locally could be one of the best responses to mitigate the damage from US tariffs, such as cost surges and profit erosion.
Before the White House announced its tariff policy, European chip giants had doubled down on producing commodity-grade chips in China to optimize global supply chain resilience by localizing production. STMicroelectronics is collaborating with Chinese contract chipmaker Huahong Group to produce 40-nanometer microcontrollers by the end of this year, as China is the world’s biggest new-energy market.
For Taiwanese manufacturers, labor costs have been the most important deciding factor in deciding where to build a factory. Now, tariffs would be at the center of corporate executives’ minds when assessing where to house their new factories and how to relocate manufacturing capacity. Moving production out of China is not the only solution; local demand has to be considered as well. Semiconductor equipment and parts suppliers even have to add new production lines and capacities in China given rapidly growing demand. That demand is part of China’s desperate efforts to build up its own chip manufacturing capacity and a whole semiconductor equipment supply chain to counteract the US’ semiconductor curbs.
China is the world’s No.1 semiconductor equipment market, accounting for 42 percent of global sales and surpassing Taiwan and South Korea last year, SEMI data showed. China bought about US$49.55 billion of semiconductor tools last year, surging 35 percent from a year earlier.
As Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co plans to invest US$165 billion to build six chip fabs in the US and a research-and-development center, Taiwan’s semiconductor equipment and parts suppliers are also seeking to build production lines in the US to cope with their key customers’ demand and avoid hefty duties on imports. Taiwan faces a significant “reciprocal” tariff of 32 percent on imports to the US, which Trump has temporarily put on hold for 90 days, with semiconductor and pharmaceutical goods exempted from the levy.
Considering the high cost of labor in the US, some semiconductor firms have opted to build facilities in Mexico to serve their US customers, although imports from Mexico face a 25 percent tariff. For corporate executives, that is still a good deal, as it would still be about half the cost of operating one in the US.
Smartphone and laptop computer makers urgently need to adopt a local-for-local strategy, as their major manufacturing sites are in China and Vietnam, which face staggering 170 percent and 46 percent US tariffs. Hon Hai Precision industry Co, a major iPhone supplier, said it is scouting multiple sites in the US to build factories. About 90 percent of iPhones are made in China. To cope with the punitive US tariff, Hon Hai has suspended certain Chinese iPhone assembly lines for US supply. The US market made up 30 percent of Apple’s overall iPhone sales. However, Hon Hai still has to assemble iPhones in China for the Chinese market and those beyond the US. China remains the world’s most cost-efficient manufacturing site.
With not a single country nor product to be spared from US levies, semiconductors and mobile phones are just two among a variety of local electronics adding pressure to manufacturers to take on a local-for-local strategy if they want to survive Trump’s tariff war.
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Keelung Mayor George Hsieh (謝國樑) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) on Tuesday last week apologized over allegations that the former director of the city’s Civil Affairs Department had illegally accessed citizens’ data to assist the KMT in its campaign to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) councilors. Given the public discontent with opposition lawmakers’ disruptive behavior in the legislature, passage of unconstitutional legislation and slashing of the central government’s budget, civic groups have launched a massive campaign to recall KMT lawmakers. The KMT has tried to fight back by initiating campaigns to recall DPP lawmakers, but the petition documents they
A recent scandal involving a high-school student from a private school in Taichung has reignited long-standing frustrations with Taiwan’s increasingly complex and high-pressure university admissions system. The student, who had successfully gained admission to several prestigious medical schools, shared their learning portfolio on social media — only for Internet sleuths to quickly uncover a falsified claim of receiving a “Best Debater” award. The fallout was swift and unforgiving. National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University and Taipei Medical University revoked the student’s admission on Wednesday. One day later, Chung Shan Medical University also announced it would cancel the student’s admission. China Medical
Construction of the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County’s Hengchun Township (恆春) started in 1978. It began commercial operations in 1984. Since then, it has experienced several accidents, radiation pollution and fires. It was finally decommissioned on May 17 after the operating license of its No. 2 reactor expired. However, a proposed referendum to be held on Aug. 23 on restarting the reactor is potentially bringing back those risks. Four reasons are listed for holding the referendum: First, the difficulty of meeting greenhouse gas reduction targets and the inefficiency of new energy sources such as photovoltaic and wind power. Second,