The bond market spoke; US President Donald Trump blinked. The lettuce theory of former British prime minister Liz Truss holds true: No leader, not even one who has shrugged off assassination attempts and a fraud trial, can remain steadfast in the face of a policy-induced meltdown that punishes voters it aims to protect. The question is: What now?
What is clear from markets is that the 90-day reprieve from worst-case tariffs on “any country, except for China” is by no means a back-to-square-one moment. The US dollar’s haven status has been hurt, while Bloomberg Economics still expects stagflation in the US and a hit to growth in the EU.
The US remains a place where policy uncertainty is high, where tariffs can jump by double digits in days and where social-media influencers wield power over generals. This uncertainty is what deters investment and hurts economic confidence, rather than just tariffs.
And while the euro has held up as a relative island of calm, it is hardly a back-to-square-one moment for US allies like the EU either. Trump’s crowd has spent the past 90 days (and more) making clear to Europeans it has no interest in keeping up existing security commitments without more in return — especially if there is not going to be a change on China trade. Why would the next 90 days be any different? If Trump surrounds himself with new advisers who wield scalpels rather than flamethrowers, expect even more pressure on tech rules, China derisking and NATO spending — and more dividing and conquering of European allies. Clinging to the idea that Trumpism is a passing phase did not work the first time and will not work now.
This 90-day reprieve could work to Europe’s advantage. Trump and his entourage have done Europe a favor: They have kept the continent together so far by hitting the EU with a blanket tariff, proved there is no “Brexit benefit” by throwing UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer under the bus and devalued trust in the US’ international commitments. It is time to focus on preserving that EU unity against a trade-led economic storm that could exacerbate divisions and fuel populists already riding high in France and Germany.
The aim should be to build support for issuing joint debt — perhaps 15 percent of GDP — and unlocking trillions in savings so that Europe can invest in its own security and technology, said Miguel Otero, an analyst at Spain’s Elcano Royal Institute. As Stephen Miran, chair of Trump’s Council of Economic Advisers, has made clear, US provision of public goods is not a permanent state of affairs.
The challenge is not just about rebalancing relations with the US, but taking a more clear-eyed stance on China, which is hoping to make new inroads into Europe as a tariff war with the US intensifies. While less unpredictable than Trump, China has been exerting pressure on Europe in other ways as its stimulus-boosted export machine outruns European chipmakers, chemical firms and automakers like BMW AG. This is another reason for Europe to pursue an investment jolt at home rather than swap one dependency for another; Chinese automaker BYD Co’s American depositary receipts rose on Thursday on a Handelsblatt report of EU-China electric-vehicle tariff talks.
For now, EU leaders seem relieved at being able to simply do their own tariff “pause”: Retaliatory tariffs that would further harm US$1.5 trillion in bilateral trade are being shelved and Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk is calling for a responsible transatlantic approach. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez, while leaving the door open to more China investment, is also optimistic on talks with Trump. The sunny weather is adding to the sense that maybe the EU has dodged the worst, but the status quo is on borrowed time.
Lionel Laurent is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist writing about the future of money and the future of Europe. Previously, he was a reporter for Reuters and Forbes. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
Within Taiwan’s education system exists a long-standing and deep-rooted culture of falsification. In the past month, a large number of “ghost signatures” — signatures using the names of deceased people — appeared on recall petitions submitted by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) against Democratic Progressive Party legislators Rosalia Wu (吳思瑤) and Wu Pei-yi (吳沛憶). An investigation revealed a high degree of overlap between the deceased signatories and the KMT’s membership roster. It also showed that documents had been forged. However, that culture of cheating and fabrication did not just appear out of thin air — it is linked to the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
RSS