Tariff developments continued to dominate headlines last week, with the US and China imposing fresh tit-for-tat tariffs, further escalating trade tensions between the world’s two largest economies. However, global markets also received a major reprieve after US President Donald Trump on Wednesday announced a 90-day pause on most “reciprocal” tariffs, except for those against China.
From an economic perspective, Trump’s tariff pause has done little to improve the global outlook, as it only applies to countries that have pledged not to retaliate against higher US levies. The baseline 10 percent tariff is still in place for all countries, which US National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett in an interview with CNBC said would be a permanent measure.
Moreover, average US tariffs have risen markedly since Trump took office on Jan. 20, driven by a range of additional duties on cars, steel and aluminum. In particular, the US levies on Chinese imports have shot up from 20 percent to 145 percent, with the escalating confrontation between the two sides casting a potentially long and dark shadow over the global economic outlook.
However, Trump’s 90-day tariff pause offers countries additional time to negotiate trade deals. Taiwan held its first tariff talks with the US on Friday and plans to hold further discussions soon.
In addition, the tariff reprieve provides companies with a critical window of opportunity to speed up shipments and look for other trade options. It also helps to ease concerns about supply chain liquidity and mitigates the risk of an immediate economic slowdown.
While the tariff pause helps improve market sentiment a bit, one should not celebrate too early, as concerns have been raised that the high tariffs on China would divert Chinese goods into other nations or transit through low-tariff, third-party countries before entering US shores. The latter has especially raised attention in Taiwan, Vietnam, Mexico and several other countries about China’s tariff evasion and dubious transshipment tactics, as governments strive to engage with the US to reach tariff deals. Considering Trump’s higher-than-expected reciprocal tariffs on Cambodia, Vietnam, Myanmar, Thailand and Indonesia, the US government seems to prioritize closing loopholes that previously enabled transhippments via those Southeast Asian countries to conceal the origin of Chinese goods and evade tariffs.
To earn the trust of its trading partners amid the ongoing restructuring of global trade, Taiwan should enhance efforts to prevent China’s low-priced goods being rerouted through its territory and falsely labeled as “Made in Taiwan.”
Therefore, the Customs Administration should rigorously verify the origin of goods suspected to be imported from China and destined for the US, to prevent mislabeling and illegal transshipment schemes.
The authorities also need to impose stricter penalties for origin fraud and product mislabeling, as these issues are central to Taiwan-US tariff negotiations and could influence Washington’s assessment of Taipei’s credibility.
Furthermore, the government must pay attention to a proposed amendment to Article 18-1 of the Offshore Islands Development Act (離島建設條例) put forward by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators. The amendment seeks to establish an “offshore free-trade demonstration zone” in Kinmen and Lienchiang counties — an initiative that would not only grant Chinese citizens, companies, goods and investments free-trade access, but also create a “backdoor” for the transshipment of Chinese goods, disguising the country of origin and minimizing tariff payments.
The danger of such legislation lies in its potential to undermine Taiwan’s national security and sabotage its trade relationship with the US.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
Within Taiwan’s education system exists a long-standing and deep-rooted culture of falsification. In the past month, a large number of “ghost signatures” — signatures using the names of deceased people — appeared on recall petitions submitted by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) against Democratic Progressive Party legislators Rosalia Wu (吳思瑤) and Wu Pei-yi (吳沛憶). An investigation revealed a high degree of overlap between the deceased signatories and the KMT’s membership roster. It also showed that documents had been forged. However, that culture of cheating and fabrication did not just appear out of thin air — it is linked to the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
RSS