Data show that dentistry programs at universities have better enrolment than programs for physicians. This issue has less to do with specific departments or medical specializations than it has to do with social attitudes toward medical professionals.
In the past, doctors were accorded high social status and looked up to for the role they play in society. They not only protect people and save lives, but have also stepped up at critical moments, speaking out on social injustices.
The father of Taiwan literature and doctor Loa Ho (賴和) did just that, as did the renowned pharmacologist Tu Tsung-ming (杜聰明), activist and politician Chen Yung-hsing (陳永興) and President William Lai (賴清德) — all of whom were doctors and medical professionals.
From the Japanese colonial period through the democratization movement, doctors were not only found in their clinical practices and hospital wards, but oftentimes, they were active as intellectuals working toward the public good.
However, these days medical professionals are finding themselves increasingly put upon. With the National Health Insurance system’s global budget system and low point-value payments, doctors are laboring under considerable workloads and long hours, yet they are inadequately recompensed and receive little support.
To address the pressure from the points-value system, hospitals across Taiwan are cutting down on human resources, increasing work hours and requiring doctors to become little more than diagnostic automatons. Increasingly, doctors are becoming physically and mentally exhausted. Beginning with the completion of their residencies, a substantial number of junior doctors are being overworked. They do not have the time or energy to stand up for their own rights, much less play a role in social reform.
How can an environment like this produce the next Loa Ho? How is such a system going to lead to medical professionals’ willingness to stand up for the public good?
Moreover, there are fewer incentives for joining this professional field. The kinds of people needed to enter the field are being pushed away. Based on a National Taiwan University Hospital internal survey, about 30 percent of medical students regret going into medicine. Many plan on switching careers or going overseas for career development opportunities. This is not just an issue of personal choice, but a system-wide exhaustion of the younger generation’s idealism.
Taiwan used to say with pride that doctors were the most responsible, social reform-oriented group of professionals. If today’s system is causing doctors to be drowned in work and pushed to the brink, then having a good conscience alone would do them little good. Taiwan would not only be losing talent and expertise, but a considerable force for social progress.
One reason medical professionals have given so much back is due less to professional training or the taking of the Hippocratic oath, it is because of the respect and support that they have been accorded.
If doctors are to speak out again and become protectors of social good, the first step would be to rebuild the system with a proper focus on respecting medical work. The respect and humanity with which doctors have been treated has allowed them to see the humanity in others and instills in them the will to be a voice for social progress.
Lu Chun-wei is a dermatologist and an assistant professor at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital.
Translated by Tim Smith
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
RSS