Data show that dentistry programs at universities have better enrolment than programs for physicians. This issue has less to do with specific departments or medical specializations than it has to do with social attitudes toward medical professionals.
In the past, doctors were accorded high social status and looked up to for the role they play in society. They not only protect people and save lives, but have also stepped up at critical moments, speaking out on social injustices.
The father of Taiwan literature and doctor Loa Ho (賴和) did just that, as did the renowned pharmacologist Tu Tsung-ming (杜聰明), activist and politician Chen Yung-hsing (陳永興) and President William Lai (賴清德) — all of whom were doctors and medical professionals.
From the Japanese colonial period through the democratization movement, doctors were not only found in their clinical practices and hospital wards, but oftentimes, they were active as intellectuals working toward the public good.
However, these days medical professionals are finding themselves increasingly put upon. With the National Health Insurance system’s global budget system and low point-value payments, doctors are laboring under considerable workloads and long hours, yet they are inadequately recompensed and receive little support.
To address the pressure from the points-value system, hospitals across Taiwan are cutting down on human resources, increasing work hours and requiring doctors to become little more than diagnostic automatons. Increasingly, doctors are becoming physically and mentally exhausted. Beginning with the completion of their residencies, a substantial number of junior doctors are being overworked. They do not have the time or energy to stand up for their own rights, much less play a role in social reform.
How can an environment like this produce the next Loa Ho? How is such a system going to lead to medical professionals’ willingness to stand up for the public good?
Moreover, there are fewer incentives for joining this professional field. The kinds of people needed to enter the field are being pushed away. Based on a National Taiwan University Hospital internal survey, about 30 percent of medical students regret going into medicine. Many plan on switching careers or going overseas for career development opportunities. This is not just an issue of personal choice, but a system-wide exhaustion of the younger generation’s idealism.
Taiwan used to say with pride that doctors were the most responsible, social reform-oriented group of professionals. If today’s system is causing doctors to be drowned in work and pushed to the brink, then having a good conscience alone would do them little good. Taiwan would not only be losing talent and expertise, but a considerable force for social progress.
One reason medical professionals have given so much back is due less to professional training or the taking of the Hippocratic oath, it is because of the respect and support that they have been accorded.
If doctors are to speak out again and become protectors of social good, the first step would be to rebuild the system with a proper focus on respecting medical work. The respect and humanity with which doctors have been treated has allowed them to see the humanity in others and instills in them the will to be a voice for social progress.
Lu Chun-wei is a dermatologist and an assistant professor at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital.
Translated by Tim Smith
Elbridge Colby, America’s Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, is the most influential voice on defense strategy in the Second Trump Administration. For insight into his thinking, one could do no better than read his thoughts on the defense of Taiwan which he gathered in a book he wrote in 2021. The Strategy of Denial, is his contemplation of China’s rising hegemony in Asia and on how to deter China from invading Taiwan. Allowing China to absorb Taiwan, he wrote, would open the entire Indo-Pacific region to Chinese preeminence and result in a power transition that would place America’s prosperity
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
All 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and suspended Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安), formerly of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), survived recall elections against them on Saturday, in a massive loss to the unprecedented mass recall movement, as well as to the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) that backed it. The outcome has surprised many, as most analysts expected that at least a few legislators would be ousted. Over the past few months, dedicated and passionate civic groups gathered more than 1 million signatures to recall KMT lawmakers, an extraordinary achievement that many believed would be enough to remove at
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
RSS