US President Donald Trump has announced sweeping “reciprocal tariffs” on US trading partners, ranging from 10 percent to 49 percent, covering industrial products and agricultural products — including a 32 percent tax on agricultural goods from Taiwan that is set to take effect on Wednesday.
The White House said the tariffs aim to address “the injustices of global trade, reshore manufacturing and drive economic growth for the American people.”
However, the policy resembles a machine gun indiscriminately firing.
The method used to calculate the “reciprocal tariffs” involves dividing the US trade deficit by the total value of imports, then halving the figure. Yet in the case of Taiwan, the US has a trade surplus in agricultural products, making the imposition of a 32 percent tariff unjustifiable.
The government should urge the US to treat agricultural products separately from industrial goods in trade calculations. At the very least, it should negotiate a baseline tariff of no more than 10 percent.
The government should also consider imposing 38 percent “reciprocal tariffs” on agricultural products from the US. This rate is derived by taking half of Taiwan’s US$2.89 billion trade deficit with the US and expressing it as a percentage of the US$3.78 billion in total agricultural imports from the US.
The government should also conduct a thorough analysis of Taiwan’s agricultural competitors in the US market — including the tariff rates imposed on their goods, the resulting post-tariff prices and how those compare with Taiwanese products. This would help assess Taiwan’s relative competitiveness and identify areas of potential disadvantage.
The government should also evaluate the demand for Taiwanese agricultural products in the US to determine the price elasticity of market demands and the possibility of transferring the cost of the tariffs to consumers by raising the prices.
If price elasticity is high, there is limited room for price increases. This would have a greater impact on homogenous goods — such as fishery products like tilapia, squid, tuna, dolphinfish and bass — resulting in lower profit margins and export volumes.
In contrast, heterogeneous products tend to have lower price elasticity, allowing for greater flexibility in pricing. As a result, the impact of newly imposed tariffs on these products would be relatively limited.
Consumers are generally willing to pay higher prices for differentiated products such as butterfly orchids and specialty tea leaves, due to their unique and superior qualities. This aligns with the strategy adopted by many Taiwanese businesses — emphasizing value and distinction over price competition.
The new tariffs are likely to have a smaller effect on such differentiated agricultural goods. For example, butterfly orchids are considered secondary goods: their sprouts are cultivated in Taiwan and then exported to greenhouses in the US, where they are grown to full maturity.
In the short term, Taiwan could face a mismatch between domestic production and sales. Therefore, it is essential to closely monitor the proportion of exports relative to total production for affected goods to ensure appropriate countermeasures.
Facing the US’ tariff turmoil, the government and the private sector should conduct proper market research and analysis of their competitors, while engaging in market development.
Taiwan should also leverage its advantages in non-price competitions, such as species, quality, brands and traceability of goods, to bolster its competitiveness in the international market.
Yang Ming-hsien is a professor in the Department of International Business at Feng Chia University.
Translated by Fion Khan
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS