Taipei First Girls’ High School on Monday announced that it has banned its teachers from participating in interviews with Chinese state media after Chinese literature teacher Ou Kui-chih (區桂芝) sparked an outcry by criticizing President William Lai (賴清德) on China Central Television (CCTV).
Ou criticized Lai’s move to designate China as a “hostile foreign force,” saying she did not know how she could face her Chinese relatives.
However, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) in the past week has held military drills encircling Taiwan — exercises that officials in the US and elsewhere have characterized as destabilizing to regional peace. Chinese state media also published cartoon pictures of Lai that referred to him as a “parasite.”
The president’s designation of China as “hostile” seems appropriate.
Ou’s purported inability to face her relatives due to Lai’s comments exemplifies the repression and hostility that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) represents — the party is intolerant of anything that contradicts its narrative.
Ou’s criticism of a Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) president is understandable, given the cuts to the classical Chinese curriculum initiated by the previous DPP administration. However, Ou labeling the cuts as “desinicization” is telling.
Taiwan still struggles with a lack of consensus on national identity. While for some there is a distinction between being culturally and linguistically Chinese on the one hand and politically Chinese on the other, others see no difference.
Although Taiwanese have the right to consider themselves “Chinese,” including politically, public servants — especially teachers — should refrain from statements or allusions to that effect while at work or in the public sphere. The salaries of public servants are paid by the government through tax, so they should be politically neutral on the outside.
Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) last week said that while he respects teachers’ freedom of expression, they should maintain a clear sense of national consciousness and identity. Cheng’s statement seems to overlook the lack of consensus on matters, but the spirit of the comment is correct. People employed by the state should act in the collective best interest of the nation.
Taiwanese are averse to the thought of the nation falling under Chinese rule, so Beijing’s threats to make unification happen — by force if necessary — and to punish, even execute, those advocating independence, make China a hostile foreign force in the eyes of most Taiwanese.
Taipei has recently begun cracking down on artists and content creators who publicly advocate for China’s use of military force in annexing Taiwan, even deporting Chinese who do so, but teachers who criticize the government or praise the CCP on Chinese state television are the same, if not worse, as young students are easily influenced, and national identity takes root in schools through curricula about history and shared experiences.
There are concerns that the laws do not stipulate adequate punishments for people who collude with China, while judges often impose light or deferred sentences for such acts. Lai has sought to address that by proposing the reinstatement of military tribunals for national security cases involving armed forces personnel. For cases involving civilians, the Mainland Affairs Council has suggested the establishment of a special court with judges who specialize in national security.
The government should ensure that teachers — and other public-sector workers — act in the public’s best interest and that they are strictly punished for acts of sedition or collusion with China.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS